Abstract P580: Prevalence and Natural History of Large Vessel Occlusion in Childhood Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilmot Bonnet ◽  
Michael M Dowling ◽  
Patricia Plumb
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Many studies have reported endovascular revascularization therapy (ERT) in children with Childhood Acute Ischemic Stroke (CAIS). With the recent expansion of thrombectomy windows via DAWN/DEFUSE3, more pediatric stroke patients are likely to be potential candidates for intervention. The prevalence of Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) in the adult population is 25-33% however the prevalence and natural history of LVO in the pediatric population have not yet been described. Methods: This is an IRB approved single center observational study by retrospective chart review of all CAIS who presented acutely to our center from 2004 to 2019. Components of Chart review: Vessel involvement, Mortality/dependency, PSOM and MRS, Etiology, Intervention/Time window of presentation/eligibility for DAWN/DEFUSE, treatment (thrombolysis, ERT), and outcome. Results: 48/218 (22%) of patients with CAIS had an acute presentation consistent with LVO (95% CI 16.7-28.1%). Of the patients with LVO, 23 (46%) were due to large vessel arteriopathy, 15(30%) were cardioembolic, 4 had a hypercoagulable state and 7 were cryptogenic. Ages ranged from day of life 1 to 18 years. 6 (12%) patients died within 2 years of LVO (3 of stroke, 3 from other causes). 5 of the 218 patients reviewed received thrombolysis, with 4/48 LVO patients received thrombolytics. 5/49 LVO patients underwent ERT (4 with at least TICI 2A reperfusion). Average age of LVO patients 14.2 years. PSOM/ comparative outcome data collection is ongoing. Conclusion: Prevalence of LVO has not yet been described in the pediatric population. At our center, 22.4% of CAIS patients had imaging consistent with large vessel occlusion at presentation. This rate is close to that of the adult population (25-33%). Many children have tolerated ERT with good outcomes. Time windows may be less applicable in children given presence of better collaterals and good cardiovascular function. More data is needed regarding the use of advanced imaging modalities for patient stratification in acute neurovascular intervention. Different inclusion criteria may be necessary given improved outcomes among children without intervention.

Abstract 151: Early Neurologic Decline in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Thrombolysis With Large Vessel Occlusion and Initial Mild Deficits

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Thakur ◽  
Ciaran J Powers ◽  
Shahid M Nimjee ◽  
Patrick Youssef ◽  
Sushil Lakhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: A quarter of ischemic stroke patients with initial mild deficits have a poor outcome. We sought to determine the rate of early neurological decline in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who presented with mild deficits. Methods: Among 1022 acute ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IVtPA) admitted to our institution from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2019, we identified 313 (30.6%) with LVO. We defined anterior circulation LVO as M1, M2, or carotid artery terminus (ICAT). Mild deficits were defined as National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 7. Data was abstracted on demographics, neuroimaging, last known well (LKW), time to IVtPA, intra-arterial therapy (IAT) revascularization, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score (TICI), clinical presentation, and outcome. Early neurologic decline was defined as NIHSS worsening of ≥ 4 points within 24 hours. Results: Among 313 patients with LVO, we identified 94 (30%) who presented with initial low NIHSS (≤ 7) due to anterior circulation LVO. We excluded 13 patients who did not have natural history data (underwent IAT with mild deficits), leaving 81 patient for analysis. The mean age was 65.8 years (range 25 to 93) and 41% were female. IVtPA time from LKW was a mean 2.5 hours (range, 0.8 to 7). LVO sites were as follows: 5 (6%) ICAT, 23 (28%) M1, and 53 (65%) M2 occlusions. Among the 81 patients, 27 (33.3%) had early neurological decline. Patients with decline were significantly older (71.2 vs 63.1 years, p=0.03). Among the 27 patients with decline, the mean change in NIHSS was 10.5 (range, 4 to 22) and 12 patients (44%) underwent rescue IAT resulting in TICI 2B (6) and TICI 3 (6) revascularization. On hospital discharge, patients with decline were less likely to be discharged home (26% vs 65%, p=0.006). Conclusions: Among LVO patients who received IVtPA, 30% present with initial mild deficits. Early neurological decline occurred in one-third of LVO patients with initial mild deficits despite receiving IVtPA, and patients with decline were less likely to be discharged home. Clinicians need to be aware of the natural history of LVO with initial mid deficits, as patients who decline would be eligible for rescue IAT in the expanded 24 hour window.

Early neurologic decline in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving thrombolysis with large vessel occlusion and mild deficits

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1085-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivien H Lee ◽  
Gaurav Thakur ◽  
Shahid M Nimjee ◽  
Patrick P Youssef ◽  
Sushil Lakhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time

BackgroundWe sought to determine the rate of early neurologic decline (END) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who presented with mild deficits and received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IVtPA).MethodsAmong 1022 patients with AIS who received IVtPA from 2014 to 2019, we identified 313 (30.6%) with LVO, of which 94 (30%) presented with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤7. Thirteen patients were excluded, leaving 81 for analysis. END was defined as NIHSS worsening of ≥4 points within 24 hours.ResultsAmong 81 patients with LVO and low NIHSS score, the mean age was 65.8 years (range 25–93) and 41% were female. The mean time to IVtPA from last known well was 2.5 hours (range 0.8–7). LVO sites were as follows: 5 (6%) carotid, 23 (28%) M1, and 53 (65%) M2 occlusions. Among the 81 patients, 28 (34.6%) had END, and these patients were older (70.8 vs 63.2 years, p=0.036). The mean change in NIHSS score at 24 hours in those with END was 10.4 (range 4–22). Patients with END were less likely to be discharged home (25% vs 66%, p=0.004).ConclusionsAmong patients with LVO AIS who received IVtPA, 30% presented with initial mild deficits. END occurred in one-third of LVO patients with initial mild deficits despite receiving IVtPA. Clinicians should be aware that the natural history of LVO with initial mild deficits is not benign and these patients are eligible for rescue thrombectomy in the 24-hour window if they deteriorate.

Effect of “drip-and-ship” and “drip-and-drive” on endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a single-center retrospective study

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110068
Author(s):  
Yu Hang ◽  
Zhen Yu Jia ◽  
Lin Bo Zhao ◽  
Yue Zhou Cao ◽  
Huang Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) were usually transferred from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular treatment (drip-and-ship [DS]), while driving the doctor from a CSC to a PSC to perform a procedure is an alternative strategy (drip-and-drive [DD]). Purpose To compare the efficacy and prognosis of the two strategies. Material and Methods From February 2017 to June 2019, 62 patients with LVO received endovascular treatment via the DS and DD models and were retrospectively analyzed from the stroke alliance based on our CSC. Primary endpoint was door-to-reperfusion (DTR) time. Secondary endpoints included puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) rates at the end of the procedure, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Results Forty-one patients received the DS strategy and 21 patients received the DD strategy. The DTR time was significantly longer in the DS group compared to the DD group (315.5 ± 83.8 min vs. 248.6 ± 80.0 min; P < 0.05), and PTR time was shorter (77.2 ± 35.9 min vs. 113.7 ± 69.7 min; P = 0.033) compared with the DD group. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) was achieved in 89% (36/41) of patients in the DS group and 86% (18/21) in the DD group ( P = 1.000). Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 49% (20/41) of patients in the DS group and 71% (15/21) in the DD group at 90 days ( P = 0.089). Conclusion Compared with the DS strategy, the DD strategy showed more effective and a trend of better clinical outcomes for AIS patients with LVO.

scholarly journals Emergency medical dispatchers’ ability to identify large vessel occlusion stroke during emergency calls

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauli E. T. Vuorinen ◽  
Jyrki P. J. Ollikainen ◽  
Pasi A. Ketola ◽  
Riikka-Liisa K. Vuorinen ◽  
Piritta A. Setälä ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Emergency Call ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Emergency Response System ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Cortical Ischemia

Abstract Background In acute ischemic stroke, conjugated eye deviation (CED) is an evident sign of cortical ischemia and large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to determine if an emergency dispatcher can recognise LVO stroke during an emergency call by asking the caller a binary question regarding whether the patient’s head or gaze is away from the side of the hemiparesis or not. Further, we investigated if the paramedics can confirm this sign at the scene. In the group of positive CED answers to the emergency dispatcher, we investigated what diagnoses these patients received at the emergency department (ED). Among all patients brought to ED and subsequently treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) we tracked the proportion of patients with a positive CED answer during the emergency call. Methods We collected data on all stroke dispatches in the city of Tampere, Finland, from 13 February 2019 to 31 October 2020. We then reviewed all patient records from cases where the dispatcher had marked ‘yes’ to the question regarding patient CED in the computer-aided emergency response system. We also viewed all emergency department admissions to see how many patients in total were treated with MT during the period studied. Results Out of 1913 dispatches, we found 81 cases (4%) in which the caller had verified CED during the emergency call. Twenty-four of these patients were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. Paramedics confirmed CED in only 9 (11%) of these 81 patients. Two patients with positive CED answers during the emergency call and 19 other patients brought to the emergency department were treated with MT. Conclusion A small minority of stroke dispatches include a positive answer to the CED question but paramedics rarely confirm the emergency medical dispatcher’s suspicion of CED as a sign of LVO. Few patients in need of MT can be found this way. Stroke dispatch protocol with a CED question needs intensive implementation.

Differences in Acute Ischemic Stroke Management and Prognosis between Multiple Large-Vessel Occlusion and Single Large-Vessel Occlusion: Subanalysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-404
Author(s):  
Kotaro Tatebayashi ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Hiroto Kageyama ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Nobuyuki Ohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Tandem Occlusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Patient Prognosis

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The management and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to multiple large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (MLVO) are not well scrutinized. We therefore aimed to elucidate the differences in patient characteristics and prognosis of MLVO and single LVO (SLVO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) enrolled 2,420 consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patient prognosis between MLVO and SLVO in the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and in mortality at 90 days by adjusting for confounders. Additionally, we stratified MLVO patients into tandem occlusion and different territories, according to the occlusion site information and also examined their characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 2,399 patients registered, 124 (5.2%) had MLVO. Although there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of hypertension as a risk factor, the mean arterial pressure on admission was significantly higher in MLVO (115 vs. 107 mm Hg, <i>p</i> = 0.004). MLVO in different territories was more likely to be cardioembolic (42.1 vs. 10.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), while MLVO in tandem occlusion was more likely to be atherothrombotic (39.5 vs. 81.3%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Among MLVO, tandem occlusion had a significantly longer onset-to-door time than different territories (200 vs. 95 min, <i>p</i> = 0.02); accordingly, the tissue plasminogen activator administration was significantly less in tandem occlusion (22.4 vs. 47.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, interestingly, the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed significantly more in tandem occlusion (63.2 vs. 41.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.0). The type of MLVO was the only and significant factor associated with EVT performance in multivariate analysis. The favorable outcomes were obtained less in MLVO than in SLVO (28.2 vs. 37.1%; aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76). The mortality rate was not significantly different between MLVO and SLVO (8.9 vs. 11.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.42). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The prognosis of MLVO was significantly worse than that of SLVO. In different territories, we might be able to consider more aggressive EVT interventions.

Abstract TP1: The Promising System to Support Rural Area Where No Intervenitionists to Perform Embolectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke "Drive and Retrieve Method"

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Osanai
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Rural Area ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Introduction: In Japan, endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion should be performed by neurointerventionists. However, most hospitals in rural area , that offer treatment for cerebral vascular disease do not have access to a neurointerventionist; the rural areas are especially affected. Thus, Our University has offered support to institutions without a neurointerventionist, to perform endovascular treatment. The neurointerventionists stationed in other hospitals drive to retrieve the resultant clot since the acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion. We called this the “drive and retrieve system” method, and launched the prospective trial to evaluate the validity and efficacy of this method. Herein, we report the initial results of this trial. Methods: Nine institutes across our affiliated hospitals within a one-hour drive from Sapporo City took part in this trial. Three of these 9 institutes that have a full-time neurointerventionist were registered as the source. When an episode of acute ischemic stroke requiring intervention occurred in the other 6 hospitals, the available neurointerventionist provided treatment based on the drive and retrieve method. The neurointerventionists’ schedules was updated and distributed to all participating units twice a week, so that the supported hospitals could immediately make contact when required. We analysis the data of 44 cases in this trial from July 2015 to April 2016. Results: For 41 out of 44 cases (93%), Neurointerventionaists were able to respond immediately. The median time from door-to-puncture was 90 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 72-125). The median time from puncture to recanalization was also 76 min (IQR: 57.5-99.5). The recanalization rate (TICI 2b/3) was 77 %. mRS 0-2 was 39%. Conclusion: The drive and retrieve system has the potential to support rural medical institutes that do not have access to a full-time neurointerventionist.

Abstract P104: Incidence, Characteristics and Outcomes of Large Vessel Stroke in Covid-19: An International Multicenter Study

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyank Khandelwal ◽  
Fawaz Al-Mufti ◽  
Ambooj Tiwari ◽  
Amit Singla ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
International Multicenter Study ◽  
International Multicenter

Background: While there are reports of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in COVID-19 patients, the overall incidence of acute ischemic stroke and clinical characteristics of large vessel occlusion in such patient remains to be established. Methods: A retrospective, international multicenter study of large vessel occlusion (LVO) was undertaken from March 1 to May 1, 2020 at 12 stroke centers from 4 countries. Detailed data were collected on consecutive LVOs in hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the incidence of AIS/LVO was measured. Among patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy, stroke outcomes along with COVID-19 symptoms were reported. Results: Out of a total of 6698 COVID-19 patients admitted to 10 stroke centers, the incidence of stroke was found to be 1.3% (range 0.6-2.6%). The median age of patients who presented with LVO was 51 years (range 27-87) and in the US centers, African Americans comprised 28% of all patients. Ten patients (16 %) were less than 50 years of age with no significant risk factors for LVOs the vast majority. Among the LVOs eligible for MT, the average time to presentation from symptom onset to presentation was 9.3 hours. Successful revascularization was achieved in 81% of patients and the intracranial hemorrhage rate was 14% with no symptomatic hemorrhages. Twenty-one (50%) patients were either discharged to home or to acute rehabilitation facilities. Conclusion: LVOs was predominant in patients with AIS and COVID-19, occurring at a significantly younger age and affecting African Americans disproportionately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document