Introduction:
Developing accurate measurements of infarct volume is vital to studying outcomes in Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke (PAS). Methods for measuring Acute Infarct Volumes (aIV) are well established in PAS. However, techniques for measuring chronic infarct volume (cIV) in order to estimate aIV have not been validated and must account for changes in Total Brain Volume (TBV) over time, as well as contraction of the infarct. We compared two methods of measuring cIV, hypothesizing that cIV extrapolated from residual uninfarcted brain tissue volume would better estimate aIV than direct measurement of cIV.
Methods:
Using modified manual segmentation techniques, two pediatric neuroradiologists independently measured the brain and infarct volumes of 10 PAS patients both on the acute (0-7 days old) and chronic (>3 months) MRIs. Volume measurements were averaged after high inter-rater reliability was established (ICC>0.9). We evaluated acute and chronic scans for changes in infarct anatomy, and excluded patients with bilateral infarctions. Method 1 for estimating cIV used a direct measurement of the infarct (figure). Method 2 extrapolated infarct volume from residual uninfarcted brain tissue (figure). The cIV for each method was then compared to the aIV.
Results:
3 patients with bilateral infarcts were excluded. Infarct anatomy between acute and chronic scans did not change for the 7 unilateral infarcts evaluated. In these 7 cases, the ICC comparing aIV and cIV from Method 1 was 0.507 (CI -0.120, 0.891), while the ICC comparing aIV and cIV from Method 2 was 0.964 (CI 0.821, 0.994). cIV’s from Method 1 were smaller than the aIV’s in all cases, despite stability of infarct anatomy.
Conclusions:
In this pilot study measuring cIV in PAS, direct measurement of cIV likely underestimates volume because of contraction of infarcted tissue. In conclusion, extrapolation of cIV from measurement of residual uninfarcted tissue appears to accurately estimate aIV.