scholarly journals MAIT: Malware Analysis and Intelligence Tool

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 49-65
Author(s):  
Cagatay Yucel ◽  
Adam Lockett ◽  
Ioannis Chalkias ◽  
Dimitrios Mallis ◽  
Vasilios Katos
Keyword(s):  
Malware Analysis

Virtualization Evolution For Transparent Malware Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
Leenu Singh Leenu Singh ◽  
◽  
Syed Imtiyaz Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Malware Analysis

REVERSE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FORENSIC MALWARE WEBC2-DIV

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raditya Faisal Waliulu ◽  
Teguh Hidayat Iskandar Alam
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Engineering ◽  
Malware Analysis ◽  
Engineering Analysis ◽  
Know How

At this paper focus on Malicous Software also known as Malware APT1 (Advance Persistent Threat) codename WEBC2-DIV the most variants malware has criteria consists of Virus, Worm, Trojan, Adware, Spyware, Backdoor either Rootkit. Although, malware could avoidance scanning antivirus but reverse engineering could be know how dangerous malware infect computer client. Lately, malware attack as a form espionage (cyberwar) one of the most topic on security internet, because of has massive impact. Forensic malware becomes indicator successfull user to realized about malware infect. This research about reverse engineering. A few steps there are scanning, suspected packet in network and analysis of malware behavior and dissambler body malware.Keyword : forensic malware, Analysis, Advance Presistent Threat, Cyberwar, dissambler

scholarly journals Malware Detection Based on Code Visualization and Two-Level Classification

Information ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Vassilios Moussas ◽  
Antonios Andreatos
Keyword(s):  
Web Applications ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Malware Detection ◽  
Image Features ◽  
Malicious Code ◽  
Malware Analysis ◽  
Malicious Software ◽  
Antivirus Software ◽  
Malware Classification ◽  
Artificial Neural Network Ann

Malware creators generate new malicious software samples by making minor changes in previously generated code, in order to reuse malicious code, as well as to go unnoticed from signature-based antivirus software. As a result, various families of variations of the same initial code exist today. Visualization of compiled executables for malware analysis has been proposed several years ago. Visualization can greatly assist malware classification and requires neither disassembly nor code execution. Moreover, new variations of known malware families are instantly detected, in contrast to traditional signature-based antivirus software. This paper addresses the problem of identifying variations of existing malware visualized as images. A new malware detection system based on a two-level Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is proposed. The classification is based on file and image features. The proposed system is tested on the ‘Malimg’ dataset consisting of the visual representation of well-known malware families. From this set some important image features are extracted. Based on these features, the ANN is trained. Then, this ANN is used to detect and classify other samples of the dataset. Malware families creating a confusion are classified by a second level of ANNs. The proposed two-level ANN method excels in simplicity, accuracy, and speed; it is easy to implement and fast to run, thus it can be applied to antivirus software, smart firewalls, web applications, etc.

scholarly journals Hypervisor-assisted dynamic malware analysis

Cybersecurity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roee S. Leon ◽  
Michael Kiperberg ◽  
Anat Anatey Leon Zabag ◽  
Nezer Jacob Zaidenberg
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Static Analysis ◽  
Cyber Security ◽  
Malware Analysis ◽  
Analysis Tools ◽  
Significant Performance

AbstractMalware analysis is a task of utmost importance in cyber-security. Two approaches exist for malware analysis: static and dynamic. Modern malware uses an abundance of techniques to evade both dynamic and static analysis tools. Current dynamic analysis solutions either make modifications to the running malware or use a higher privilege component that does the actual analysis. The former can be easily detected by sophisticated malware while the latter often induces a significant performance overhead. We propose a method that performs malware analysis within the context of the OS itself. Furthermore, the analysis component is camouflaged by a hypervisor, which makes it completely transparent to the running OS and its applications. The evaluation of the system’s efficiency suggests that the induced performance overhead is negligible.

scholarly journals Detection of Malicious Software by Analyzing Distinct Artifacts Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 1694
Author(s):  
Mathew Ashik ◽  
A. Jyothish ◽  
S. Anandaram ◽  
P. Vinod ◽  
Francesco Mercaldo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Malware Analysis ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Dynamic Features ◽  
System Calls ◽  
Prevention Methods ◽  
Structural Aspects

Malware is one of the most significant threats in today’s computing world since the number of websites distributing malware is increasing at a rapid rate. Malware analysis and prevention methods are increasingly becoming necessary for computer systems connected to the Internet. This software exploits the system’s vulnerabilities to steal valuable information without the user’s knowledge, and stealthily send it to remote servers controlled by attackers. Traditionally, anti-malware products use signatures for detecting known malware. However, the signature-based method does not scale in detecting obfuscated and packed malware. Considering that the cause of a problem is often best understood by studying the structural aspects of a program like the mnemonics, instruction opcode, API Call, etc. In this paper, we investigate the relevance of the features of unpacked malicious and benign executables like mnemonics, instruction opcodes, and API to identify a feature that classifies the executable. Prominent features are extracted using Minimum Redundancy and Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Experiments were conducted on four datasets using machine learning and deep learning approaches such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes, J48, Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost. In addition, we also evaluate the performance of the collection of deep neural networks like Deep Dense network, One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN), and CNN-LSTM in classifying unknown samples, and we observed promising results using APIs and system calls. On combining APIs/system calls with static features, a marginal performance improvement was attained comparing models trained only on dynamic features. Moreover, to improve accuracy, we implemented our solution using distinct deep learning methods and demonstrated a fine-tuned deep neural network that resulted in an F1-score of 99.1% and 98.48% on Dataset-2 and Dataset-3, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document