Neuropsychological Evidence of an Integrated Visuotactile Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Làdavas ◽  
Giuseppe di Pellegrino ◽  
Alessandro Farnè ◽  
Gabriele Zeloni
Keyword(s):  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Tactile Stimulus ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Sensory Modality ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Peripersonal Space ◽  
Extrapersonal Space ◽  
Touch Perception ◽  
Neuropsychological Evidence ◽  
Representations Of Space

Current interpretations of extinction suggest that the disorder is due to an unbalanced competition between ipsilesional and contralesional representations of space. The question addressed in this study is whether the competition between left and right representations of space in one sensory modality (i.e., touch) can be reduced or exacerbated by the activation of an intact spatial representation in a different modality that is functionally linked to the damaged representation (i.e., vision). This hypothesis was tested in 10 right-hemisphere lesioned patients who suffered from reliable tactile extinction. We found that a visual stimulus presented near the patient's ipsilesional hand (i.e., visual peripersonal space) inhibited the processing of a tactile stimulus delivered on the contralesional hand (cross-modal visuotactile extinction) to the same extent as did an ipsilesional tactile stimulation (unimodal tactile extinction). It was also found that a visual stimulus presented near the contralesional hand improved the detection of a tactile stimulus applied to the same hand. In striking contrast, less modulatory effects of vision on touch perception were observed when a visual stimulus was presented far from the space immediately around the patient's hand (i.e., extrapersonal space). This study clearly demonstrates the existence of a visual peripersonal space centered on the hand in humans and its modulatory effects on tactile perception. These findings are explained by referring to the activity of bimodal neurons in premotor and parietal cortex of macaque, which have tactile receptive fields on the hand and corresponding visual receptive fields in the space immediately adjacent to the tactile fields.

The Processing of What, Where, and How

2018 ◽  
pp. 150-166
Author(s):  
Michael J. Proulx ◽  
David J. Brown ◽  
Achille Pasqualotto
Keyword(s):  
Visual Information ◽  
Visually Impaired ◽  
Spatial Navigation ◽  
Sensory Modality ◽  
Peripersonal Space ◽  
Sensory Substitution ◽  
Action Processing ◽  
Extrapersonal Space ◽  
Detection Of Objects ◽  
Processing Of Visual Information

Vision is the default sensory modality for normal spatial navigation in humans. Touch is restricted to providing information about peripersonal space, whereas detecting and avoiding obstacles in extrapersonal space is key for efficient navigation. Hearing is restricted to the detection of objects that emit noise, yet many obstacles such as walls are silent. Sensory substitution devices provide a means of translating distal visual information into a form that visually impaired individuals can process through either touch or hearing. Here we will review findings from various sensory substitution systems for the processing of visual information that can be classified as what (object recognition), where (localization), and how (perception for action) processing. Different forms of sensory substitution excel at some tasks more than others. Spatial navigation brings together these different forms of information and provides a useful model for comparing sensory substitution systems, with important implications for rehabilitation, neuroanatomy, and theories of cognition.

Auditory Peripersonal Space in Humans

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1030-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Farnè ◽  
Elisabetta Làdavas
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Representation ◽  
Tactile Stimulus ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Noise Burst ◽  
Spatial Arrangement ◽  
Peripersonal Space ◽  
The Body ◽  
Space Representation ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Neuropsychological Evidence

In the present study we report neuropsychological evidence of the existence of an auditory peripersonal space representation around the head in humans and its characteristics. In a group of right brain-damaged patients with tactile extinction, we found that a sound delivered near the ipsilesional side of the head (20 cm) strongly extinguished a tactile stimulus delivered to the contralesional side of the head (cross-modal auditory-tactile extinction). By contrast, when an auditory stimulus was presented far from the head (70 cm), cross-modal extinction was dramatically reduced. This spatially specific cross-modal extinction was most consistently found (i.e., both in the front and back spaces) when a complex sound was presented, like a white noise burst. Pure tones produced spatially specific cross-modal extinction when presented in the back space, but not in the front space. In addition, the most severe cross-modal extinction emerged when sounds came from behind the head, thus showing that the back space is more sensitive than the front space to the sensory interaction of auditory-tactile inputs. Finally, when cross-modal effects were investigated by reversing the spatial arrangement of cross-modal stimuli (i.e., touch on the right and sound on the left), we found that an ipsilesional tactile stimulus, although inducing a small amount of cross-modal tactile-auditory extinction, did not produce any spatial-specific effect. Therefore, the selective aspects of cross-modal interaction found near the head cannot be explained by a competition between a damaged left spatial representation and an intact right spatial representation. Thus, consistent with neurophysiological evidence from monkeys, our findings strongly support the existence, in humans, of an integrated cross-modal system coding auditory and tactile stimuli near the body, that is, in the peripersonal space.

Audiovisual Simultaneity Judgements in Synaesthesia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Anna Borgolte ◽  
Ahmad Bransi ◽  
Johanna Seifert ◽  
Sermin Toto ◽  
Gregor R. Szycik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Multisensory Processing ◽  
Sensory Modality ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Visual Events

Abstract Synaesthesia is a multimodal phenomenon in which the activation of one sensory modality leads to an involuntary additional experience in another sensory modality. To date, normal multisensory processing has hardly been investigated in synaesthetes. In the present study we examine processes of audiovisual separation in synaesthesia by using a simultaneity judgement task. Subjects were asked to indicate whether an acoustic and a visual stimulus occurred simultaneously or not. Stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) as well as the temporal order of the stimuli were systematically varied. Our results demonstrate that synaesthetes are better in separating auditory and visual events than control subjects, but only when vision leads.

scholarly journals Visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke B. Debats ◽  
Herbert Heuer ◽  
Christoph Kayser
Keyword(s):  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Sensory Modality ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Multisensory Perception ◽  
Proprioceptive Information ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Cursor Control ◽  
Sensory Recalibration ◽  
Winner Takes All

AbstractTo organize the plethora of sensory signals from our environment into a coherent percept, our brain relies on the processes of multisensory integration and sensory recalibration. We here asked how visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration are shaped by the presence of more than one visual stimulus, hence paving the way to study multisensory perception under more naturalistic settings with multiple signals per sensory modality. We used a cursor-control task in which proprioceptive information on the endpoint of a reaching movement was complemented by two visual stimuli providing additional information on the movement endpoint. The visual stimuli were briefly shown, one synchronously with the hand reaching the movement endpoint, the other delayed. In Experiment 1, the judgments of hand movement endpoint revealed integration and recalibration biases oriented towards the position of the synchronous stimulus and away from the delayed one. In Experiment 2 we contrasted two alternative accounts: that only the temporally more proximal visual stimulus enters integration similar to a winner-takes-all process, or that the influences of both stimuli superpose. The proprioceptive biases revealed that integration—and likely also recalibration—are shaped by the superposed contributions of multiple stimuli rather than by only the most powerful individual one.

Mechanisms of Within- and Cross-Modality Suppression in the Superior Colliculus

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 2834-2847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Kadunce ◽  
J. William Vaughan ◽  
Mark T. Wallace ◽  
Gyorgy Benedek ◽  
Barry E. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Specific Interest ◽  
Input Channel ◽  
Modality Effects ◽  
Excitatory Stimulus ◽  
Modality Specificity ◽  
Cat Superior Colliculus ◽  
Close Temporal Proximity

Kadunce, Daniel C., J. William Vaughan, Mark T. Wallace, Gyorgy Benedek, and Barry E. Stein. Mechanisms of within- and cross-modality suppression in the superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2834–2847, 1997. The present studies were initiated to explore the basis for the response suppression that occurs in cat superior colliculus (SC) neurons when two spatially disparate stimuli are presented simultaneously or in close temporal proximity to one another. Of specific interest was examining the possibility that suppressive regions border the receptive fields (RFs) of unimodal and multisensory SC neurons and, when activated, degrade the neuron's responses to excitatory stimuli. Both within- and cross-modality effects were examined. An example of the former is when a response to a visual stimulus within its RF is suppressed by a second visual stimulus outside the RF. An example of the latter is when the response to a visual stimulus within the visual RF is suppressed when a stimulus from a different modality (e.g., auditory) is presented outside its (i.e., auditory) RF. Suppressive regions were found bordering visual, auditory, and somatosensory RFs. Despite significant modality-specific differences in the incidence and effectiveness of these regions, they were generally quite potent regardless of the modality. In the vast majority (85%) of cases, responses to the excitatory stimulus were degraded by ≥50% by simultaneously stimulating the suppressive region. Contrary to expectations and previous speculations, the effects of activating these suppressive regions often were quite specific. Thus powerful within-modality suppression could be demonstrated in many multisensory neurons in which cross-modality suppression could not be generated. However, the converse was not true. If an extra-RF stimulus inhibited center responses to stimuli of a different modality, it also would suppress center responses to stimuli of its own modality. Thus when cross-modality suppression was demonstrated, it was always accompanied by within-modality suppression. These observations suggest that separate mechanisms underlie within- and cross-modality suppression in the SC. Because some modality-specific tectopetal structures contain neurons with suppressive regions bordering their RFs, the within-modality suppression observed in the SC simply may reflect interactions taking place at the level of one input channel. However, the presence of modality-specific suppression at the level of one input channel would have no effect on the excitation initiated via another input channel. Given the modality-specificity of tectopetal inputs, it appears that cross-modality interactions require the convergence of two or more modality-specific inputs onto the same SC neuron and that the expression of these interactions depends on the internal circuitry of the SC. This allows a cross-modality suppressive signal to be nonspecific and to degrade any and all of the neuron's excitatory inputs.

Development of the Halifax Visual Scanning Test: A New Measure of Visual-Spatial Neglect for Personal, Peripersonal, and Extrapersonal Space

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (05) ◽  
pp. 490-500
Author(s):  
Christiane E. Whitehouse ◽  
Janet Green ◽  
Sarah M. Giles ◽  
Rosanna Rahman ◽  
Jamesie Coolican ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Spatial Neglect ◽  
Visual Scanning ◽  
Control Data ◽  
Normative Database ◽  
Rehabilitation Outcomes ◽  
Visual Spatial ◽  
Extrapersonal Space ◽  
Stroke Group

Objectives: Visual-spatial neglect is a common attentional disorder after right-hemisphere stroke and is associated with poor rehabilitation outcomes. The presence of neglect symptoms has been reported to vary across personal, peripersonal, and extrapersonal space. Currently, no measure is available to assess neglect severity equally across these spatial regions and may be missing subsets of symptoms or patients with neglect entirely. We sought to provide initial construct validity for a novel assessment tool that measures neglect symptoms equally for these spatial regions: the Halifax Visual Scanning Test (HVST). Methods: In Study I, the HVST was compared to conventional measures of neglect and functional outcome scores (wheelchair navigation) in 15 stroke inpatients and 14 healthy controls. In Study II, 19 additional controls were combined with the control data from Study I to establish cutoffs for impairment. Patterns of neglect in the stroke group were examined. Results: In Study I, performance on all HVST subtests were correlated with the majority of conventional subtests and wheelchair navigation outcomes. In Study II, neglect-related deficits in visual scanning showed dissociations across spatial regions. Four inpatients exhibited symptoms of neglect on the HVST that were not detected on conventional measures, one of which showed symptoms in personal and extrapersonal space exclusively. Conclusions: The HVST appears a useful measure of neglect symptoms in different spatial regions that may not be detected with conventional measures and that correlates with functional wheelchair performance. Preliminary control data are presented and further research to add to this normative database appears warranted. (JINS, 2019, 25, 490–500)

scholarly journals Meissner corpuscles and their spatially intermingled afferents underlie gentle touch perception

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 368 (6497) ◽  
pp. eabb2751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole L. Neubarth ◽  
Alan J. Emanuel ◽  
Yin Liu ◽  
Mark W. Springel ◽  
Annie Handler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Microscopic Analysis ◽  
Sensorimotor Control ◽  
Glabrous Skin ◽  
Kinetic Properties ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Force Sensitivity ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Touch Perception ◽  
Lamellar Cell

Meissner corpuscles are mechanosensory end organs that densely occupy mammalian glabrous skin. We generated mice that selectively lacked Meissner corpuscles and found them to be deficient in both perceiving the gentlest detectable forces acting on glabrous skin and fine sensorimotor control. We found that Meissner corpuscles are innervated by two mechanoreceptor subtypes that exhibit distinct responses to tactile stimuli. The anatomical receptive fields of these two mechanoreceptor subtypes homotypically tile glabrous skin in a manner that is offset with respect to one another. Electron microscopic analysis of the two Meissner afferents within the corpuscle supports a model in which the extent of lamellar cell wrappings of mechanoreceptor endings determines their force sensitivity thresholds and kinetic properties.

Responses of rabbit superior colliculus neurons to repeated visual stimuli

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. Oyster ◽  
E. S. Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Decay Time ◽  
Spontaneous Recovery ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Habituation Rate ◽  
Rate Dependent ◽  
Superior Colliculus Neurons ◽  
Made In

It has been shown that cells in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus exhibit response decrements when a visual stimulus is repeated. These response decrements have some of the properties associated with habituation, in particular, 1) spontaneous recovery and 2) habituation rate dependent on stimulus frequency. These observations have been made in two classes of neurons; direction-selective cells and so-called modified concentric cells. All of these neurons had small receptive fields and well-defined response properties. Some neurons in both the direction-selective and modified concentric groups do not show habituation. On the basis of area-threshold curves and other observations, it is suggested that those neurons which habituate possess strong inhibitory inputs which are weak or lacking in thenonhabituating neurons. This generalization leads to a hypothesis that inhibition in the superior colliculus has a long decay time and that a response to a given stimulus is affected by inhibition activated by preceding stimuli.

Categorical and Metric Spatial Processes Distinguished by Task Demands and Practice

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie T. Banich ◽  
Kara D. Federmeier
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spatial Relations ◽  
Task Demands ◽  
Spatial Processing ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Metric Distance ◽  
The Right ◽  
Categorical Spatial Relations

In this study we examined Kosslyn's (1987) claim that the right hemisphere exhibits a relative superiority for processing metric spatial relations, whereas the left hemisphere exhibits a relative superiority for processing categorical spatial relations. In particular, we examined whether some failures to observe strong visual field (VF) advantages in previous studies might be due to practice effects that allowed individuals to process tasks in alternative manners (e.g., to process a metric task using a categorical strategy). We used two versions of a task previously employed by Hellige and Michimata (1989) in which individuals judge the metric (distance) or categorical (above/below) spatial relations between a bar and a dot. In one version, the position of the bar was held static. In another, the bar's position varied. This manipulation prevented participants from using the computer screen as a reference frame, forcing them to compute the spatial relationships on the basis of the relevant items only (i.e., the bar and the dot). In the latter, but not the former version of the task we obtained evidence supporting Kosslyn's hypothesis, namely, a significant right visual field (RVF) advantage for categorical spatial processing and a trend toward a left visual field (LVF) advantage for metric spatial processing. Furthermore, the pattern of results for trials on which information was presented centrally (CVF trials) was similar to that observed on RVF trials, whereas the pattern for trials in which identical information was presented in each visual field (BVF trials) was similar to that observed on LVF trials. Such a pattern is consistent with Kosslyn's suggestion that categorical processing is better suited for cells with small receptive fields and metric processing for cells with larger receptive fields.

Temporal-Order Discrimination for Selected Auditory and Visual Stimulus Dimensions

1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis J. McFarland ◽  
Anthony T. Cacace ◽  
Gavin Setzen
Keyword(s):  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Sensory Modality ◽  
Stimulus Dimension ◽  
Psychophysical Method ◽  
Adaptive Procedure ◽  
Color Test ◽  
Correct Point ◽  
Adult Volunteers

Thresholds for the discrimination of temporal order were determined for selected auditory and visual stimulus dimensions in 10 normal-adult volunteers. Auditory stimuli consisted of binary pure tones varying in frequency or sound pressure level, and visual stimuli consisted of binary geometric forms varying in size, orientation, or color. We determined the effect of psychophysical method and the reliability of performance across stimulus dimensions. Using a single-track adaptive procedure, Experiment 1 showed that temporal-order thresholds (TOTs) varied with stimulus dimension, being lowest for auditory frequency, intermediate for size, orientation, and auditory level, and longest for color. Test performance improved over sessions and the profile of thresholds across stimulus dimensions had a modest reliability. Experiment 2 used a double-interleaved adaptive procedure and TOTs were similarly ordered as in Experiment 1. However, TOT swere significantly lower for initially ascending versus descending tracks. With this method, the reliability of the profile across stimulus dimensions and tracks was relatively low. In Experiment 3, psychometric functions were obtained for each of the stimulus dimensions and thresholds were defined as the interpolated 70.7% correct point. The relative ordering of TOTs was similar to those obtained in the first two experiments. Non-monotonicities were found in some of the psychometric functions, with the most prominent being for the color dimension. A crossexperiment comparison of results demonstrates that TOTs and their reliability are significantly influenced by the psychophysical method. Taken together, these results support the notion that the temporal resolution of ordered stimuli involves perceptual mechanisms specific to a given sensory modality or submodality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document