Motion on Numbers: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Ventral Intraparietal Sulcus Alters Both Numerical and Motion Processes

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2129-2138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Salillas ◽  
Demis Basso ◽  
Maurizia Baldi ◽  
Carlo Semenza ◽  
Tomaso Vecchi
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motion Detection ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Coherent Motion ◽  
Intraparietal Sulcus ◽  
Close Link ◽  
Number Comparison ◽  
Neural Substrate

It has often been proposed that there is a close link between representation of number and space. In the present work, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the ventral intraparietal sulcus (VIPS) to determine effects on performance in motion detection and number comparison tasks. Participants' reaction times and thresholds for perception of laterally presented coherent motion in random dot kinematograms increased significantly when the contralateral VIPS was stimulated in contrast to the interhemispheric sulcus (Experiment 1) and to the ipsilateral VIPS (Experiment 2). In number comparison tasks, participants compared the magnitude of the laterally presented numbers 1–9 with the number 5. Again, reaction times significantly increased when TMS was applied to the contralateral VIPS in contrast to control sites. The finding that VIPS-directed TMS results in impaired efficiency in both motion perception and number comparison suggests that these processes share a common neural substrate.

scholarly journals Motor disability in patients with multiple sclerosis: transcranial magnetic stimulation study

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anssam Bassem Mohy ◽  
Aqeel Kareem Hatem ◽  
Hussein Ghani Kadoori ◽  
Farqad Bader Hamdan
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Motor Disability

Abstract Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive procedure used in a small targeted region of the brain via electromagnetic induction and used diagnostically to measure the connection between the central nervous system (CNS) and skeletal muscle to evaluate the damage that occurs in MS. Objectives The study aims to investigate whether single-pulse TMS measures differ between patients with MS and healthy controls and to consider if these measures are associated with clinical disability. Patients and methods Single-pulse TMS was performed in 26 patients with MS who hand an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 0 and 9.5 and in 26 normal subjects. Different TMS parameters from upper and lower limbs were investigated. Results TMS disclosed no difference in all MEP parameters between the right and left side of the upper and lower limbs in patients with MS and controls. In all patients, TMS parameters were different from the control group. Upper limb central motor conduction time (CMCT) was prolonged in MS patients with pyramidal signs. Upper and lower limb CMCT and CMCT-f wave (CMCT-f) were prolonged in patients with ataxia. Moreover, CMCT and CMCT-f were prolonged in MS patients with EDSS of 5–9.5 as compared to those with a score of 0–4.5. EDSS correlated with upper and lower limb cortical latency (CL), CMCT, and CMCT-f whereas motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude not. Conclusion TMS yields objective data to evaluate clinical disability and its parameters correlated well with EDSS.

scholarly journals Top-down control of visual cortex by the frontal eye fields through oscillatory realignment

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenica Veniero ◽  
Joachim Gross ◽  
Stephanie Morand ◽  
Felix Duecker ◽  
Alexander T. Sack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Visual Perception ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Frontal Eye Fields ◽  
Phase Reset ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
Beta Frequency

AbstractVoluntary allocation of visual attention is controlled by top-down signals generated within the Frontal Eye Fields (FEFs) that can change the excitability of lower-level visual areas. However, the mechanism through which this control is achieved remains elusive. Here, we emulated the generation of an attentional signal using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to activate the FEFs and tracked its consequences over the visual cortex. First, we documented changes to brain oscillations using electroencephalography and found evidence for a phase reset over occipital sites at beta frequency. We then probed for perceptual consequences of this top-down triggered phase reset and assessed its anatomical specificity. We show that FEF activation leads to cyclic modulation of visual perception and extrastriate but not primary visual cortex excitability, again at beta frequency. We conclude that top-down signals originating in FEF causally shape visual cortex activity and perception through mechanisms of oscillatory realignment.

scholarly journals Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Evoked Potential Amplitudes and Latencies in the Motor and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex among Young, Older Healthy Participants, and Schizophrenia Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Noda ◽  
Mera S. Barr ◽  
Reza Zomorrodi ◽  
Robin F. H. Cash ◽  
Pantelis Lioumis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Signal Propagation ◽  
Lower Amplitude ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal ◽  
The Right

Background: The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG) allows for non-invasive investigation of cortical response and connectivity in human cortex. This study aimed to examine the amplitudes and latencies of each TMS-evoked potential (TEP) component induced by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) to the left motor (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) among healthy young participants (YNG), older participants (OLD), and patients with schizophrenia (SCZ). Methods: We compared the spatiotemporal characteristics of TEPs induced by spTMS among the groups. Results: Compared to YNG, M1-spTMS induced lower amplitudes of N45 and P180 in OLD and a lower amplitude of P180 in SCZ, whereas the DLPFC-spTMS induced a lower N45 in OLD. Further, OLD demonstrated latency delays in P60 after M1-spTMS and in N45-P60 over the right central region after left DLPFC-spTMS, whereas SCZ demonstrated latency delays in N45-P60 over the midline and right central regions after DLPFC-spTMS. Conclusions: These findings suggest that inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms mediating TEPs may be altered in OLD and SCZ. The amplitude and latency changes of TEPs with spTMS may reflect underlying neurophysiological changes in OLD and SCZ, respectively. The spTMS administered to M1 and the DLPFC can probe cortical functions by examining TEPs. Thus, TMS-EEG can be used to study changes in cortical connectivity and signal propagation from healthy to pathological brains.

Cerebral Blood-Flow Changes Induced by Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 2624-2629 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Strafella ◽  
T. Paus
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Premotor Cortex ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Positive Correlation

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to assess changes in regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) induced by paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of primary motor cortex (M1). The study was performed in eight normal volunteers using two Magstim-200 stimulators linked with a Bistim module. A circular TMS coil was held in the scanner by a mechanical arm and located over the left M1. Surface electrodes were used to record motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). Cortical excitability was evaluated in the relaxed FDI using a paired conditioning-test stimulus paradigm with two interstimulus intervals (ISIs): 3 and 12 ms. The subjects were scanned three times during each of the following four conditions: 1) baseline with no TMS (BASE); 2) single-pulse TMS (TMSsing); 3) 3-ms paired-pulse TMS (TMS3); and 4) 12-ms paired-pulse TMS (TMS12). CBF and peak-to-peak MEP amplitudes were measured over each 60-s scanning period. To assess TMS-induced changes in CBF, a t-statistic map was generated by first subtracting the single-pulse TMS condition from the 3- and 12-ms paired-pulse TMS conditions and then correlating the CBF differences, respectively, with the amount of suppression and facilitation of the EMG responses. A significant positive correlation was observed between the CBF difference (TMS3-TMSsing) and the amount of suppression of EMG response, as well as between the CBF difference (TMS12-TMSsing) and the amount of facilitation of EMG response. This positive correlation was observed in the left M1, left lateral premotor cortex, and right M1 in the case of 3-ms paired-pulse TMS, but only in the left M1 in the case of 12-ms paired-pulse TMS. The above pattern of CBF response to paired-pulse TMS supports the possibility that suppression and facilitation of the EMG response are mediated by different populations of cortical interneurons.

scholarly journals Fatigue-induced changes in short-interval intracortical inhibition and the silent period with stimulus intensities evoking maximal versus submaximal responses

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
Callum G. Brownstein ◽  
Loïc Espeit ◽  
Nicolas Royer ◽  
Thomas Lapole ◽  
Guillaume Y. Millet
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Fatiguing Exercise ◽  
Induced Changes

This study compared the change in silent period (SP) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) with conditioning stimulus and single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intensities (for SICI and SP, respectively) eliciting maximal and submaximal SICI and SP during fatiguing exercise. The results showed that changes in SICI were only detectable with intensities evoking maximal responses, with no difference between intensities for SP. These findings highlight the importance of maximizing SICI with appropriate intensities before measuring SICI during fatiguing exercise.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document