Subthalamic Nucleus Activation Occurs Early during Stopping and Is Associated with Trait Impulsivity

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-521
Author(s):  
Jong H. Yoon ◽  
Edward Dong Bo Cui ◽  
Michael J. Minzenberg ◽  
Cameron S. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Native Space ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Range Function ◽  
Trait Impulsivity ◽  
Time Required

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is thought to be a central regulator of behavioral inhibition, which is thought to be a major determinant of impulsivity. Thus, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that STN function is related to impulsivity. However, it has been difficult to test this hypothesis because of the challenges in noninvasively and accurately measuring this structure's signal in humans. We utilized a novel approach for STN signal localization that entails identifying this structure directly on fMRI images for each individual participant in native space. Using this approach, we measured STN responses during the stop signal task in a sample of healthy adult participants. We confirmed that the STN exhibited selective activation during “Stop” trials. Furthermore, the magnitude of STN activation during successful Stop trials inversely correlated with individual differences in trait impulsivity as measured by a personality inventory. Time course analysis revealed that early STN activation differentiated successful from unsuccessful Stop trials, and individual differences in the magnitude of STN activation inversely correlated with stop signal RT, an estimate of time required to stop. These results are consistent with the STN playing a central role in inhibition and related behavioral proclivities, with implications for both normal range function and clinical syndromes of inhibitory dyscontrol. Moreover, the methods utilized in this study for measuring STN fMRI signal in humans may be gainfully applied in future studies to further our understanding of the role of the STN in regulating behavior and neuropsychiatric conditions.

scholarly journals Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Paci ◽  
Giulio Di Cosmo ◽  
Mauro Gianni Perrucci ◽  
Francesca Ferri ◽  
Marcello Costantini
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Behavioral Differences ◽  
Cortical Silent Period ◽  
Stop Signal Reaction Time

AbstractInhibitory control is the ability to suppress inappropriate movements and unwanted actions, allowing to regulate impulses and responses. This ability can be measured via the Stop Signal Task, which provides a temporal index of response inhibition, namely the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). At the neural level, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) allows to investigate motor inhibition within the primary motor cortex (M1), such as the cortical silent period (CSP) which is an index of GABAB-mediated intracortical inhibition within M1. Although there is strong evidence that intracortical inhibition varies during action stopping, it is still not clear whether differences in the neurophysiological markers of intracortical inhibition contribute to behavioral differences in actual inhibitory capacities. Hence, here we explored the relationship between intracortical inhibition within M1 and behavioral response inhibition. GABABergic-mediated inhibition in M1 was determined by the duration of CSP, while behavioral inhibition was assessed by the SSRT. We found a significant positive correlation between CSP’s duration and SSRT, namely that individuals with greater levels of GABABergic-mediated inhibition seem to perform overall worse in inhibiting behavioral responses. These results support the assumption that individual differences in intracortical inhibition are mirrored by individual differences in action stopping abilities.

scholarly journals Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1601-1614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey N. White ◽  
Eliza Congdon ◽  
Jeanette A. Mumford ◽  
Katherine H. Karlsgodt ◽  
Fred W. Sabb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Inhibitory Control ◽  
Processing Speed ◽  
Execution Time ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Motor Execution ◽  
Stimulus Processing ◽  
Model Based ◽  
The Right

The stop-signal task, in which participants must inhibit prepotent responses, has been used to identify neural systems that vary with individual differences in inhibitory control. To explore how these differences relate to other aspects of decision making, a drift-diffusion model of simple decisions was fitted to stop-signal task data from go trials to extract measures of caution, motor execution time, and stimulus processing speed for each of 123 participants. These values were used to probe fMRI data to explore individual differences in neural activation. Faster processing of the go stimulus correlated with greater activation in the right frontal pole for both go and stop trials. On stop trials, stimulus processing speed also correlated with regions implicated in inhibitory control, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, and BG. Individual differences in motor execution time correlated with activation of the right parietal cortex. These findings suggest a robust relationship between the speed of stimulus processing and inhibitory processing at the neural level. This model-based approach provides novel insight into the interrelationships among decision components involved in inhibitory control and raises interesting questions about strategic adjustments in performance and inhibitory deficits associated with psychopathology.

scholarly journals The motor inhibitory network in patients with asymmetrical Parkinson’s disease: An fMRI study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis R. Loayza ◽  
Ignacio Obeso ◽  
Rafael González Redondo ◽  
Federico Villagra ◽  
Elkin Luis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Inferior Frontal Gyrus ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Inhibitory Network ◽  
Fmri Study ◽  
The Right

AbstractRecent imaging studies with the stop-signal task in healthy individuals indicate that the subthalamic nucleus, the pre-supplementary motor area and the inferior frontal gyrus are key components of the right hemisphere “inhibitory network”. Limited information is available regarding neural substrates of inhibitory processing in patients with asymmetric Parkinson’s disease. The aim of the current fMRI study was to identify the neural changes underlying deficient inhibitory processing on the stop-signal task in patients with predominantly left-sided Parkinson’s disease. Fourteen patients and 23 healthy controls performed a stop-signal task with the left and right hands. Behaviorally, patients showed delayed response inhibition with either hand compared to controls. We found small imaging differences for the right hand, however for the more affected left hand when behavior was successfully inhibited we found reduced activation of the inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally and the insula. Using the stop-signal delay as regressor, contralateral underactivation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal and anterior putamen were found in patients. This finding indicates dysfunction of the right inhibitory network in left-sided Parkinson’s disease. Functional connectivity analysis of the left subthalamic nucleus showed a significant increase of connectivity with bilateral insula. In contrast, the right subthalamic nucleus showed increased connectivity with visuomotor and sensorimotor regions of the cerebellum. We conclude that altered inhibitory control in left-sided Parkinson’s disease is associated with reduced activation in regions dedicated to inhibition in healthy controls, which requires engagement of additional regions, not observed in controls, to successfully stop ongoing actions.

The subthalamic nucleus is involved in successful inhibition in the stop-signal task: A local field potential study in Parkinson's disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Alegre ◽  
Jon Lopez-Azcarate ◽  
Ignacio Obeso ◽  
Leonora Wilkinson ◽  
Maria C. Rodriguez-Oroz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Local Field ◽  
Local Field Potential ◽  
Field Potential ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Potential Study

scholarly journals When Brain Stimulation Backfires

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Beth Bell ◽  
Brian Turner ◽  
Lumy Sawaki ◽  
C. Nathan DeWall
Keyword(s):  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Impulsive Behavior ◽  
Trait Impulsivity ◽  
Behavior Scale ◽  
Healthy Participants ◽  
Intended Effect

Transcranial direct current stimulation can sometimes cause the opposite of its intended effect. These reverse effects may be related in part to individual differences in personality and neurochemistry. Previous studies have demonstrated that dopamine levels can impact the effects of tDCS. In the present study, 124 healthy participants took the UPPS Impulsive Behavior scale. Participants then underwent a single, randomized anodal or sham tDCS session on the prefrontal cortex. While the effects of tDCS were still active, they performed the Stop Signal Task, a measure of state impulsivity. tDCS was associated with increased errors on this task in people who had higher scores on the UPPS in two facets of impulsivity that correlate with dopamine levels. tDCS had no effects on people low in trait impulsivity. These results suggest that the reverse effects of tDCS could be associated with inter-individual differences in personality and neurochemistry.

scholarly journals “Distinct roles of dorsal and ventral subthalamic neurons in action selection and cancellation.”

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton P. Mosher ◽  
Adam N. Mamelak ◽  
Mahsa Malekmohammadi ◽  
Nader Pouratian ◽  
Ueli Rutishauser
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Action Selection ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Single Neurons ◽  
Motor Programs ◽  
Behavioral Outcome ◽  
Motor Cortical ◽  
Subthalamic Neurons

AbstractThe subthalamic nucleus (STN) supports action selection by inhibiting all motor programs except the desired one. Recent evidence suggests that STN can also cancel an already selected action when goals change, a key aspect of cognitive control. However, there is little neurophysiological evidence for a dissociation between selecting and cancelling actions in the human STN. We recorded single neurons in the STN of humans performing a stop-signal task. Movement-related neurons suppressed their activity during successful stopping whereas stop-signal neurons activated at low-latencies regardless of behavioral outcome. In contrast, STN and motor-cortical beta-bursting occurred only later in the stopping process. Task-related neuronal properties varied by recording location from dorsolateral movement to ventromedial stop-signal tuning. Therefore, action selection and cancellation coexist in STN but are anatomically segregated. These results show that human ventromedial STN neurons carry fast stop-related signals suitable for implementing cognitive control.

scholarly journals Individual differences in stop-related activity are inflated by the adaptive algorithm in the stop signal task

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 3263-3276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas D'Alberto ◽  
Bader Chaarani ◽  
Catherine A. Orr ◽  
Philip A. Spechler ◽  
Matthew D. Albaugh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Adaptive Algorithm ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Related Activity

scholarly journals When brain stimulation backfires: the effects of prefrontal cortex stimulation on impulsivity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Beth Bell ◽  
Brian Turner ◽  
Lumy Sawaki ◽  
Nathan DeWall
Keyword(s):  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Impulsive Behavior ◽  
Trait Impulsivity ◽  
Behavior Scale ◽  
Healthy Participants ◽  
Intended Effect

Abstract Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can sometimes cause the opposite of its intended effect. These reverse effects may be related in part to individual differences in personality and neurochemistry. Previous studies have demonstrated that dopamine levels can impact the effects of tDCS. In the present study, 124 healthy participants took the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Participants then underwent a single, randomized anodal or sham tDCS session on the prefrontal cortex. While the effects of tDCS were still active, they performed the Stop Signal Task, a measure of state impulsivity. tDCS was associated with increased errors on this task in people who had higher scores on the UPPS in two facets of impulsivity that correlate with dopamine levels. tDCS had no effects on people who are low in trait impulsivity. These results suggest that the reverse effects of tDCS could be associated with inter-individual differences in personality and neurochemistry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document