Benchmarks Of Economic Reform In North Korea

Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 233-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Woong Lee

The international community is now paying more attention to `the systemic, widespread and grave violations of international human rights norms' (United Nations ECOSOC Resolution 1503, (1970) See Burgental (1995)) in North Korea due to its chronic famine and nuclear ambition. The issues and engagement politics regarding human rights in North Korea constitute hot political debates. There are three key factors to improve human rights status in North Korea: the consistent international censure; enlarging engagement and people contact through inter-Korean relations; and economic reform in North Korea. These factors are interrelated and affect each other. The crucial point is to press and induce the North Korean regime to a compromise path.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (4) ◽  
pp. 70-72
Author(s):  
Nathan Beauchamp-Mustafaga
Keyword(s):  

Asian Survey ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Jung-en Woo

The most important changes that relate to North Korea in 2005 were the great strides in the inter-Korean relationship and the economic ““reform”” since 2002, which grafts ““profit maximization”” to the heart of what is arguably the most rigid planned economy the world has ever known.


Asian Survey ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Yung Lee

The second year of Kim Jong Un’s rule in North Korea was enormously eventful. The year began with Pyongyang carrying out its third nuclear test, a move of reckless brinksmanship that alarmed the region and beyond. North Korea formally declared its goal of “simultaneously pursuing nuclear and economic development,” but failed to take a decisive step toward economic reform. The ruthless purge and execution of Jang Song-taek revealed the structural weakness of the ruling system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-324
Author(s):  
Sungmin Cho

Can North Korea implement Chinese-style reform and opening-up policies? This is an important question, directly relevant to the policy debate on North Korea’s nuclear challenges. Through comparative historical analysis, I argue that Pyongyang has failed to adopt the Chinese-style reform and opening-up for the internal and structural restraints. The Chinese experience shows that the economic reform and opening, to be successful, requires a certain degree of political reform and openness to be executed together. North Korea could not implement the economic reform and opening policies as effectively as China did, not because of the external conditions like international sanctions or security threat to the country, but more for the internal contradiction that North Korea’s own economic development is likely to endanger the stability of the political system more rapidly and widely than China has experienced. For this analysis, I rely on North Korea’s published laws and economic policies, previous survey works and scholarly works published in Korean and Chinese.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keun Lee ◽  
Byung-Yeon Kim ◽  
Insook Lee
Keyword(s):  

Asian Survey ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung-Ae Park

Abstract The two most pressing problems that faced North Korea in 2003 were how to resist pressure on nuclear issues from the international community and how to cope with a crippled economy. For the former, North Korea demonstrated superficial flexibility by participating in multilateral talks but, in substance, persisting in its demands. For the latter, the country showed substantive flexibility by stepping up economic reform, recruiting young, reform-minded new faces into the leadership, and pushing for economic cooperation with the South.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document