Genetic Risk Factors For Long-Term Cognitive Impairment After Critical Illness

Author(s):  
Max L. Gunther ◽  
James C. Jackson ◽  
Pratik Pandharipande ◽  
Alessandro Morandi ◽  
Maureen Hahn ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 974-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Sutin ◽  
Y. Stephan ◽  
A. Terracciano

BackgroundMultiple studies have found Conscientiousness to be protective against dementia. The purpose of this study is to identify which specific aspects, or facets, of Conscientiousness are most protective against cognitive impairment and whether these associations are moderated by demographic factors and/or genetic risk.MethodsHealth and Retirement Study participants were selected for analysis if they completed the facets of Conscientiousness measure, scored in the range of normal cognitive functioning at the baseline personality assessment, and had at least one follow-up assessment of cognition over the up to 6-year follow-up (N = 11 181). Cox regression was used to test for risk of incident dementia and risk of incident cognitive impairment not dementia (CIND).ResultsOver the follow-up, 278 participants developed dementia and 2186 participants developed CIND. The facet of responsibility had the strongest and most consistent association with dementia risk: every standard deviation increase in this facet was associated with a nearly 35% decreased risk of dementia; self-control and industriousness were also protective. Associations were generally similar when controlling for clinical, behavioral, and genetic risk factors. These three facets were also independent predictors of decreased risk of CIND.ConclusionsThe present research indicates that individuals who see themselves as responsible, able to control their behavior, and hard workers are less likely to develop CIND or dementia and that these associations persist after accounting for some common clinical, behavioral, and genetic risk factors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amra Sakusic ◽  
John C. O'Horo ◽  
Mikhail Dziadzko ◽  
Dziadzko Volha ◽  
Rashid Ali ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Keim

There was some recent progress in the understanding of genetic risk factors in chronic pancreatitis. Due to this progress some of the traditional views of the subject will change. Today, genetic risk factors are attributed a much more important role that in the past. The frequency and strength of mutations were higher than expected. Strong variants were the rare autosomal-dominant mutations N29I and R122H of PRSS1 (cationic trypsinogen) and homozygous N34S of SPINK1 (pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor). Other mutations (heterozygous N34S, CFTR) were of lower relevance but still mediate a higher risk than alcohol consumption. The course of genetically determined pancreatitis is rather mild. In the long term pancreas cancer was found in some patients but apart from non-smoking no adequate prophylactic strategy is available up to now.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie D. R. Buskbjerg ◽  
Ali Amidi ◽  
Ditte Demontis ◽  
Eva R. Nissen ◽  
Robert Zachariae

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S_Part_12) ◽  
pp. P437-P437
Author(s):  
Pieter Jelle Visser ◽  
Lyzel Elias-Sonnenschein ◽  
Inez Ramakers ◽  
Gunter Kenis ◽  
Frans R.J. Verhey

Author(s):  
Ramona O. Hopkins ◽  
Maria E. Carlo ◽  
James C. Jackson

Evidence from dozens of studies of thousands of individuals suggest that as many as half of critical illness survivors experience significant deficits in memory, executive functioning, attention, and processing speed that persist years after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). This chapter reviews the prevalence, characteristics, possible mechanisms, and risk factors for long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. Some key risks factors—notably, delirium—may be modifiable, whereas others, such as genetic markers, are not. Cognitive impairments are associated with psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. The impact of critical illness–related cognitive impairment on individuals and society includes financial costs, inability to return to work, impairments in instrumental activities of daily living (financial management, medication management, shopping, home care), reduced quality of life, and caregiver burden. Efforts need to be directed not only at modifying risk factors but also at attempting to prevent, treat, and remediate deficits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document