A review of morphological variation in Trimeresurus popeiorum (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae), with the description of two new species

Zootaxa ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 727 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
GERNOT VOGEL ◽  
PATRICK DAVID ◽  
OLIVIER S.G. PAUWELS

Variation in morphological characters were investigated among 136 specimens (128 specimens examined by us and eight specimens described in the literature) from 44 populations of the whole range of the pitviper currently known as Trimeresurus popeiorum Smith, 1937. Univariate and mul-tivariate analyses of these morphological characters allowed us to recognize six clusters of populations that are morphologically diagnosable, and that are here considered to represent independent lineages. Five of these clusters are considered to be distinct species following the Biological Species Concept and the Phylogenetic Species Concept. Two of them are described as new. Trimeresurus fucatus spec. nov. includes populations from southern Thailand and most of West Malaysia. Trimeresurus nebularis spec. nov. is described for populations from Cameron Highlands of West Malaysia. A population from Toba Massif, northern Sumatra, is referred to this complex, but cannot be assigned to a species at the present time. Trimeresurus popeiorum sabahi is raised to specific status, Trimeresurus sabahi new comb., to accommodate the populations from Borneo, whereas Trimeresurus barati new comb. includes the populations from western Sumatra and the Mentawai Archipelago. Separate keys to the two sexes of the recognised species of the T. popeiorum complex are provided.KEY WORDS: Thailand, West Malaysia, Sumatra, Borneo, Serpentes, Viperidae, Trimeresurus, Trimeresurus popeiorum, Trimeresurus fucatus spec. nov., Trimeresurus nebularis spec. nov., Trimeresurus sabahi, Trimeresurus baratiBefore the paper by Pope & Pope (1933), all green Trimeresurus species were gathered under the name Trimeresurus gramineus (Shaw, 1802). In a first step towards understanding the systematics of the genus, these authors split the nominal taxon gramineus into six species. The specific nomen gramineus was applied to a widespread species, ranging from northeastern India to western Indonesia. Indian populations were referred to a new species described as Trimeresurus occidentalis. Subsequently, Smith (1937) correctly showed that Pope & Pope (1933) misunderstood the type locality of gramineus, and showed that the type locality for T. gramineus was within the range of T. occidentalis. Therefore, Trimeresurus occidentalis Pope & Pope 1933 became a subjective junior synonym of T. gramineus (Shaw, 1802), leaving unnamed the distinct eastern taxon. Smith (1937) named it as Trimeresurus popeiorum. Unfortunately, he failed to designate a type specimen and a type locality for this new taxon. This interpretation was accepted by most subsequent authors except Hoge & Romano Hoge (1981) and Welch (1988). Another issue affecting the specific nomen is its spelling. Smith (1943) corrected the original spelling as popeorum on the basis that it was indeed a clerical error. This spelling was largely accepted, and was the subject of recent controversies. This problem will be addressed in another paper (David & Vogel, submitted). We consider that the correct spelling is indeed popeiorum. Eventually, Taylor & Elbel (1958), regarded as syntypes of Trimeresurus popeiorum Smith, 1937 all specimens referred by Pope & Pope (1933) to as T. gramineus, and designated the specimen BMNH 72.4.17.137 as the lectotype of the species. Consequently, the type locality was restricted to Khasi Hills, Assam , now in the State of Meghalaya, India.

Zootaxa ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 1293 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICK DAVID ◽  
GERNOT VOGEL ◽  
S. P. VIJAYAKUMAR ◽  
NICOLAS VIDAL

The brown Asian pitvipers of the genus Trimeresurus related to Trimeresurus puniceus (informal Trimeresurus puniceus-complex) are revised on the basis of morphological and molecular analyses. Variation in morphological characters were investigated among 119 specimens from 62 populations of the whole range of the pitvipers currently known as Trimeresurus puniceus (Boie, 1827), Trimeresurus borneensis (Peters, 1872) and Trimeresurus brongersmai Hoge, 1969. Molecular and morphological analyses clearly differentiate two groups of taxa, referrable to the informal Trimeresurus puniceus-group and Trimeresurus borneensis-group, and confirm the distinct specific status of T. puniceus and T. borneensis. Morphological univariate and multivariate analyses differentiate six clusters of populations that are morphologically diagnosable, of which five are here considered to represent independent lineages and one is placed incertae sedis pending the availability of further specimens. These clusters are considered to be distinct species following the Biological Species Concept and the Phylogenetic Species Concept. One of them is described as a new species, Trimeresurus andalasensis spec. nov. (T. borneensis-group), which includes populations from northern Sumatra. Trimeresurus wiroti Trutnau, 1981 is revalidated to accommodate populations from Thailand and West Malaysia. Trimeresurus borneensis is here considered endemic to Borneo. Trimeresurus puniceus is known from Java and from South Sumatra, but the taxonomy of this species in Sumatra is left unresolved. Also left unresolved is the taxonomic position of specimens from western Sumatra and the Mentawai Archipelago, and from the Natuna Islands and Anamba Islands. Although belonging to the T. puniceus-group, they show some differences to other specimens of the group. They are not referred to any taxon pending the collection of additional specimens. Lastly, Trimeresurus brongersmai is confirmed as a valid species from the Mentawai Archipelago. A key to these taxa is provided.


Zootaxa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4221 (4) ◽  
pp. 431
Author(s):  
LEONARDO ESTEVES LOPES

The Unicolored Blackbird Agelasticus cyanopus (Vieillot, 1819) is a marsh bird with four allopatric subspecies restricted to lowlands in South America east of the Andes. I conducted a taxonomic revision of the species based on analysis of external morphological characters of 288 study skins, including all types available. My revision shows that: 1) Leistes unicolor Swainson, 1838, is a senior synonym of A. c. xenicus (Parkes, 1966) and, therefore, the correct name of the taxon should be A. c. unicolor (Swainson, 1838); 2) the range of A. c. unicolor (Swainson, 1838) is much wider than previously thought, extending from the mouth of the Rio Amazonas to the state of São Paulo, in southeastern Brazil, where it intergrades with A. c. atroolivaceus (zu Wied-Neuwied, 1831); 3) A. c. atroolivaceus extends its range well beyond the coast of Rio de Janeiro, reaching the coast of São Paulo, the central part of Minas Gerais, Bahia and Espírito Santo; and 4) specimens attributed to A. c. beniensis are highly variable, so this name must be considered a subjective junior synonym of the nominotypical taxon. Under the Biological Species Concept, two broadly parapatric species should be recognized, A. cyanopus and A. atroolivaceus (including unicolor as a subspecies). Under the Phylogenetic Species Concept or the General Lineage Concept of Species, the best taxonomic treatment is to recognize three species: A. cyanopus, A. atroolivaceus, and A. unicolor. 


2005 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-225
Author(s):  
Jean Génermont

Abstract In 1980, Henri Tintant advocated the usefulness of the biological species concept in paleontology. At this time, this concept was still accepted by many neontologists, but it was already rather severely criticized by some others. In fact, a lot of new concepts appeared in the course of the following two decades. While a few ones are mere adjustments of the biological concept, for instance taking in account ecological criteria, in such a way that it could be applied to clonal organisms, some others, which were developed in connexion with the cladistic theory of taxonomy, are truly new from a conceptual point of view. The diagnosable version of the phylogenetic species concept is somewhat reminiscent of Simpson’s evolutionary species concept, since it accepts phyletic speciation as well as survival of the stem species after a cladogenetic event. One of its more criticizable features, from a cladistic point of view, is that the species are not necessarilly monophyletic. On another hand, according to the monophyly version of the phylogenetic species concept, species are recognized rather subjectively as monophyletic taxa revealed by some previous cladistic analysis dealing with operational taxonomic units. A consensus on the definition of species cannot be expected, since all concepts related to the biological one are founded on population grouping on the basis of potentially identical evolutionary fates, while those which are related to cladistic taxonomy are exclusively concerned with historical features.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria J.A. Creighton ◽  
Alice Q. Luo ◽  
Simon M. Reader ◽  
Arne Ø. Mooers

ABSTRACTSpecies are the main unit used to measure biodiversity, but different preferred diagnostic criteria can lead to very different delineations. For instance, named primate species have more than doubled since 1982. Such increases have been termed “taxonomic inflation” and have been attributed to the widespread adoption of the ‘phylogenetic species concept’ (PSC) in preference to the previously popular ‘biological species concept’ (BSC). Criticisms of the PSC have suggested taxonomic inflation may be biased toward particular taxa and have unfavourable consequences for conservation. Here, we explore predictors of taxonomic inflation across primate taxa since the initial application of the PSC nearly 40 years ago. We do not find evidence that diversification rate, the rate of lineage formation over evolutionary time, is linked to inflation, contrary to expectations if the PSC identifies incipient species. We also do not find evidence of research effort in fields where work has been suggested to motivate splitting being associated with increases in species numbers among genera. To test the suggestion that splitting groups is likely to increase their perceived risk of extinction, we test whether genera that have undergone more splitting have also observed a greater increase in their proportion of threatened species since the introduction of the PSC. We find no cohesive signal of inflation leading to higher threat probabilities across primate genera. Overall, this analysis sends a positive message that threat statuses of primate species are not being overwhelmingly affected by splitting in line with what has recently been reported for birds. Regardless, we echo warnings that it is unwise for conservation to be reliant on taxonomic stability. Species (however defined) are not independent from one another, thus, monitoring and managing them as such may not meet the overarching goal of conserving biodiversity.


Zootaxa ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2301 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANK E. RHEINDT ◽  
JAMES A. EATON

The question of how to define a species continues to divide biologists. Meanwhile, the application of different species concepts has led to disparate taxonomic treatments that confound conservationists and other biologists. The most widely followed guidelines to species designation in avian and other vertebrate taxonomy are Ernst Mayr’s Biological Species Concept (BSC) and Joel Cracraft’s version of the Phylogenetic Species Concept (PSC). Although the BSC is considered to be more conservative in its assignment of species status, there is a lack of research demonstrating differences in taxonomic treatment between the BSC and the PSC with reference to a multi-taxon multi-trait study system. We examined the case of five traditionally recognized species of shrike-babbler (Pteruthius) that have recently been divided into 19 species under the PSC. Re-analyzing previous morphological and molecular data and adding new vocal data, we propose a BSC classification of 9 species. However, taking into consideration geographic gaps in the sampling regime, we contend that additional data will likely reduce discrepancies between the total numbers of species designated under the PSC and BSC. The current PSC species total is a likely overestimate owing to species diagnosis based on characters that erroneously appear to be unique to a taxon at low sample size. The current BSC species total as here proposed is a likely underestimate on account of the conservative designation of taxa as subspecies in equivocal cases, e.g. where BSC species status is potentially warranted but may be masked by insufficient data.


Nematology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsumi Kanzaki ◽  
Taisuke Ekino ◽  
Noritoshi Maehara ◽  
Takuya Aikawa ◽  
Robin M. Giblin-Davis

Summary Bursaphelenchus acaloleptae n. sp. is described and figured based upon its morphological characters and molecular profiles. The new species belongs to the xylophilus-group of the genus and is typologically characterised by its secretory-excretory pore being located slightly posterior to the median bulb, weakly tapering, relatively broad and straight female tail with variously shaped terminus, and rounded male bursal flap with squared terminus. The new species is phylogenetically and biologically closest to B. luxuriosae. These cryptic species share the host (habitat) tree species, Aralia elata (Araliaceae), the same carrier insect species, Acalolepta luxuriosa (Cerambycidae), and a characteristic phoretic adult form. However, the new species is typologically distinguished from all other xylophilus-group species by the combination of the above-mentioned characters and molecular profiles (SSU and LSU molecular barcodes). Further, B. acaloleptae n. sp. can be distinguished from its closest relative, B. luxuriosae, by mating experiments, i.e., these two species did not produce a viable F1 generation in reciprocal crossings, thereby confirming separate species status using the biological species concept.


2022 ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Richard A. I. Drew ◽  
Meredith C. Romig

Abstract This chapter discusses two species models, which are diametrically opposed. The first, often called the 'biological species concept', defines species in terms of 'reproductive isolation', convinced that species arise when subsets of a population are split off and remain geographically isolated over evolutionary time. If and when such new species are reunited with their founder population, interbreeding does not occur, or if it does, infertile progeny result. Hence, from the biological species concept, natural selection is a primary agent of change and directly selects for new species. In this sense, species are the direct products of natural selection and they are therefore 'adaptive devices'. When applying this species concept, it has been impossible to separate some sibling species of fruit flies in the genus Bactrocera where distinct morphological species can be similar in molecular analyses of certain DNA sequences, while similar species morphologically are distinct in the same molecular characters. A radically different model, the 'recognition concept of species', relies heavily on a knowledge of species ecology and behaviour, particularly in their natural habitat. The principal points in this concept are given. In contrast to the now-outdated biological species concept that leads one to depend on laboratory-based research to define species, the recognition concept requires workers to undertake extensive field research in the habitat of the taxon under investigation. In translating this approach to research in the insect family Tephritidae, particularly the Dacinae, some 35 years of field surveys have been undertaken throughout the Indian subcontinent, South-east Asia and the South Pacific region. These surveys included trapping using male lure traps and host fruit collections of commercial/edible fruits. The results of this work have included the provision of specimens of almost all known species for morphological descriptions (c.800 species), material for male pheromone chemistry, and data on host fruit relationships and biogeographical studies.


The Condor ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-693
Author(s):  
John W. Chardine

Abstract This paper reports geographic variation in wingtip patterns of Black-legged Kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) from the circumpolar Arctic. The amount of black in the wingtip increased and the amount of white decreased from Arctic Canada–west Greenland, counterclockwise to the Pacific. Differences were greatest between Pacific and Atlantic, but were also apparent within the Atlantic sample. Patterns of variation were not clinal. Known levels of philopatry in kittiwakes would tend to maintain both phenotypic and genotypic differences between regions, but the similarity of birds from Newfoundland, British Isles, and Barents Sea suggests some degree of dispersal over this wide area. Wingtip pattern data support continued separation of Pacific and Atlantic kittiwakes into two subspecies under the biological species concept. Under the phylogenetic species concept, Pacific and Atlantic Black-legged Kittiwakes may represent two species. Variación Geográfica en los Patrones de Coloración de la Punta del Ala de Rissa tridactyla Resumen. Este trabajo presenta la variación geográfica existente en los patrones de coloración de la punta del ala de Rissa tridactyla en el área circumpolar ártica. La cantidad de negro en la punta del ala incrementó y la cantidad de blanco disminuyó desde el ártico canadiense y el oeste de Groenlandia en sentido contrario a las agujas del reloj hacia el Pacífico. Las mayores diferencias se registraron entre el Pacífico y el Atlántico, pero también fueron evidentes en la muestra del Atlántico. Los patrones de variación no fueron graduales. Los niveles conocidos de filopatría en R. tridactyla tenderían a mantener las diferencias tanto fenotípicas como genotípicas entre regiones, pero la similitud de las aves de Newfoundland, las Islas Británicas y el Mar de Barents sugiere algún grado de dispersión a través de esta extensa área. Considerando el concepto biológico de especie, los datos sobre los patrones de la punta del ala apoyan la separación de las aves del Pacífico y del Atlántico en dos subespecies. Considerando el concepto filogenético de especie, los individuos de R. tridactyla del Pacífico y del Atlántico pueden pertenecer a dos especies diferentes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219-238
Author(s):  
Andrew V. Z. Brower ◽  
Randall T. Schuh

This chapter studies the systematists' perspective on species concepts and the role of species in systematics. No matter how sophisticated the tools and methods enhancing the conceptualization of reality may become in the future, systematists will still be constrained by their perceptions. In their more modest, empirical view, systematists embrace their perceived reality and prefer species concepts that incorporate tools for identifying and delimiting species as empirical hypotheses, thereby providing them with efficacious working terminal elements for phylogenetic analysis and classification of more inclusive taxa. It is fortunate that cladists employed the notion of a “phylogenetic” species concept based on diagnosability before more metaphysically inclined authors appropriated the term for concepts founded on monophyly or common ancestors. As noted, Willi Hennig's species concept was a version of the “biological” species concept, and it fell to his followers to develop a species concept that is well suited to cladistic principles. Among the earliest of the post-Hennigian empiricists was American Museum ichthyologist Donn Rosen. Rosen's concept, sometimes called the apomorphic concept because of its requirement that every recognized species must have its own derived character state, accomplished two key advances for systematics: it proposed a cladistic criterion for recognizing species, and it defined species as the minimal units of analysis, as far as taxonomy is concerned, thus setting a lower bound for systematic inquiry.


Zootaxa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4320 (2) ◽  
pp. 379 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL F. LANE ◽  
ANDREW W. KRATTER ◽  
JOHN P. O’NEILL

We describe a new taxon of manakin in the Machaeropterus regulus complex, from the foothills of southwestern Loreto and northern San Martín departments, Peru. This new form appears to be almost identical morphologically to the Tepui form M. regulus aureopectus but differs strongly from that and all other members of the M. regulus complex in voice. Therefore, we conclude that this population represents a new biological species that we here name Machaeropterus eckelberryi. Based on voice and some morphological characters, we concur with several previous authors (e.g., Whittaker & Oren 1999; Snow 2004; Ridgely & Tudor 2009) that nominate M. regulus (Eastern Striped Manakin), of the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, should be separated as a biological species from the polytypic Machaeropterus striolatus of western South America (Western Striped Manakin), including M. s. striolatus of Amazonia, M. r. obscurostriatus and M. r. zulianus of the Venezuelan Andes, M. r. antioquiae of the Colombian Andes, and M. r. aureopectus of the tepuis region. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document