scholarly journals Prognostic Factors in Patients with COVID-19 Disease: A Retrospective Study in a Secondary Care Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Clemens Stiegler ◽  
Tanja Seel ◽  
Claus Schaefer
Author(s):  
Gilles Louis ◽  
Benoit Pétré ◽  
Florence Schleich ◽  
Monique Henket ◽  
Virginie Paulus ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
David Broome ◽  
Gauri Bhuchar ◽  
Ehsan Fayazzadeh ◽  
James Bena ◽  
Christian Nasr

Author(s):  
Daiana Antoaneta Opris ◽  
Horia Opris ◽  
Cristian Dinu ◽  
Simion Bran ◽  
Grigore Baciut ◽  
...  

Cleft lip and palate is the most frequent birth anomaly, with increasing reported rates of complications, such as palate fistulae. Current studies concerning the occurrence rate of cleft lip and palate (CLP) report 2 to 10 cases in 10,000 births. The purpose of this study was to investigate the existence of factors that could predict the occurrence of fistulae after cleft lip and palate surgery. A retrospective study was performed by collecting and analyzing data from all patients who were operated for cleft lip and/or palate in the Maxillo-Facial Department of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, between 2010 and 2020. We investigated the existing evidence for possible links between the number of fistulae observed after the primary palatoplasty and the age at which the primary palatoplasty was performed, the sex of the patient, the type of cleft, the timing of the surgical corrections, and the presence of comorbidities. A total of 137 cases were included for analysis. A significant link between the number of fistulae and the type of cleft was found (with fistulae occurring more frequently after the surgical correction of CLP—p < 0.001). No evidence was found for the existence of significant links between the number of fistulae and the patient’s sex, the timing of surgery, or the presence of comorbidities. This study concluded that the incidence of palatal fistulae appears to be influenced by the type of cleft (CLP), but not by the sex of the patient, the timing of surgery, or the presence of comorbidities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 695.2-695
Author(s):  
D. Xu ◽  
X. Tian ◽  
X. Zeng ◽  
F. Zhang ◽  
L. Zhao ◽  
...  

Background:Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a segmental, necrotizing vascular disease that primarily impacts medium-sized muscle arteries. The estimated annual incidence of PAN is still lacking in China. Digital gangrene is an ischemic manifestation of the limb. However, the causes and the treatment methods vary from case to case, and the outcome is unpredictable. These features emphasize the need to identify measurable variables that accelerate digital gangrene development in PAN patients. However, little effort has been made to identify the clinical and laboratory factors that affect PAN patients with digital gangrene to anticipate their natural history and response to therapy.Objectives:Many patients with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) complicated with digital gangrene have poor outcomes and related research information is limited. This study was carried out to identify the associated risk and prognostic factors.Methods:We conducted a retrospective study of 148 PAN patients admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from September 1986 to December 2018. The characteristics, therapeutic regimens, and outcome data for patients with and without gangrene were compared. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazard regression model were used to evaluate the prognostic factors.Results:Forty-seven (31.8%) PAN patients had digital gangrene complications. The average age was 40.4±17.9 years and the average disease duration was 11 (4-27) months. The presence of digital gangrene was correlated with smoking history [odds ratio (OR), 4.27; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.56-11.66] and eosinophil elevation (28.12; 10.30-76.8). Thirty-two (68.1%) gangrene patients received methylprednisolone pulse therapy and all of these patients were treated with cyclophosphamide. Nine patients suffered irreversible organ injury and two died. Disease duration ≥ 24 months and elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were identified as hazardous factors for poor prognosis in patients with gangrene (P=0.003, HR=8.668, 95% CI 2.11, 35.55 andP=0.042, HR=27.062, 95% CI 1.13, 648.57, respectively).Conclusion:Smoking history and eosinophil elevation in PAN patients were more prone to digital gangrene and high serum CRP level predicted poor outcomes. PAN patients with smoking history and elevated eosinophils need to be seriously evaluated by clinicians. Furthermore, the CRP level should be efficiently controlled for good prognosis.References:[1]De Virgilio A, Greco A, Magliulo G, Gallo A, Ruoppolo G, Conte M, et al. Polyarteritis nodosa: A contemporary overview. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15:564-70.[2]Pagnoux C, Seror R, Henegar C, Mahr A, Cohen P, Le Guern V, et al. Clinical features and outcomes in 348 patients with polyarteritis nodosa: a systematic retrospective study of patients diagnosed between 1963 and 2005 and entered into the French Vasculitis Study Group Database. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:616-26.[3]Xu D, You X, Wang Z, Zeng Q, Xu J, Jiang L, et al. Chinese Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment and Research Group Registry VI: Effect of Cigarette Smoking on the Clinical Phenotype of Chinese Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134451.Acknowledgments:NoDisclosure of Interests:Dong Xu: None declared, Xinping Tian: None declared, Xiaofeng Zeng Consultant of: MSD Pharmaceuticals, Fengchun Zhang: None declared, Lin Zhao: None declared, Shangzhu Zhang: None declared, Jiaxin Zhou: None declared, Jiu-liang Zhao: None declared, Xiaodan Kong: None declared


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 748-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Alonso ◽  
Elena Gallego ◽  
Francisco Jesús González ◽  
Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
Esperanza Torres ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 2439-2448 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTIAN OSTHEIMER ◽  
CAROLINE BORMANN ◽  
ECKHARD FIEDLER ◽  
WOLFGANG MARSCH ◽  
DIRK VORDERMARK

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 290-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Kumar ◽  
Satish Kumar ◽  
Naresh Chandra Sharma ◽  
Badal Kumar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document