Electrochemical Performance Evaluation of Bipolar Membrane Using Poly(phenylene oxide) for Water Treatment System

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 6797-6801
Author(s):  
Tae Yang Son ◽  
Jun Seong Yun ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Sang Yong Nam

This study describes the use of poly(phenylene oxide) polymer-based ion-exchange polymers, polystyrene-based ion-exchange particles and a porous support for fabricating bipolar membranes and the results of an assessment of the applicability of these materials to water splitting. In order to achieve good mechanical as well as good ion-exchange properties, bipolar membranes were prepared by laminating poly(phenylene oxide) and polystyrene based ion-exchange membranes with a sulfonated polystyrene-block-(ethylene-ran-butylene)-block-polystyrene) (S-SEBS) modified interface. PE pore-supported ion-exchange membranes were also used as bipolar membranes. The tensile strength was 13.21 MPa for the bipolar membrane which utilized only a cation/anion-exchange membrane. When ion-exchange nanoparticles were introduced for high efficiency, a reduction in the tensile strength to 6.81 MPa was observed. At the same time, bipolar membrane in the form of a composite membrane using PE support exhibited the best tensile strength of 32.41 MPa. To confirm the water-splitting performance, an important factor for a bipolar membrane, pH changes over a period of 20 min were also studied. During water slitting using CA-P-PE-BPM, the pH at the CEM part and the AEM part changed from 5.4 to 4.18 and from 5.4 to 5.63, respectively.

Membranes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav Melnikov ◽  
Denis Bondarev ◽  
Elena Nosova ◽  
Ekaterina Melnikova ◽  
Victor Zabolotskiy

Bilayer ion-exchange membranes are mainly used for separating single and multiply charged ions. It is well known that in membranes in which the layers have different charges of the ionogenic groups of the matrix, the limiting current decreases, and the water splitting reaction accelerates in comparison with monolayer (isotropic) ion-exchange membranes. We study samples of bilayer ion-exchange membranes with very thin cation-exchange layers deposited on an anion-exchange membrane-substrate in this work. It was revealed that in bilayer membranes, the limiting current’s value is determined by the properties of a thin surface film (modifying layer). A linear regularity of the dependence of the non-equilibrium effective rate constant of the water-splitting reaction on the resistance of the bipolar region, which is valid for both bilayer and bipolar membranes, has been revealed. It is shown that the introduction of the catalyst significantly reduces the water-splitting voltage, but reduces the selectivity of the membrane. It is possible to regulate the fluxes of salt ions and water splitting products (hydrogen and hydroxyl ions) by changing the current density. Such an ability makes it possible to conduct a controlled process of desalting electrolytes with simultaneous pH adjustment.


2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1757-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Rozendal ◽  
T. H. J. A. Sleutels ◽  
H. V. M. Hamelers ◽  
C. J. N. Buisman

Previous studies have shown that the application of cation exchange membranes (CEMs) in bioelectrochemical systems running on wastewater can cause operational problems. In this paper the effect of alternative types of ion exchange membrane is studied in biocatalyzed electrolysis cells. Four types of ion exchange membranes are used: (i) a CEM, (ii) an anion exchange membrane (AEM), (iii) a bipolar membrane (BPM), and (iv) a charge mosaic membrane (CMM). With respect to the electrochemical performance of the four biocatalyzed electrolysis configurations, the ion exchange membranes are rated in the order AEM > CEM > CMM > BPM. However, with respect to the transport numbers for protons and/or hydroxyl ions (tH/OH) and the ability to prevent pH increase in the cathode chamber, the ion exchange membranes are rated in the order BPM > AEM > CMM > CEM.


Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
AHM Golam Hyder ◽  
Brian A. Morales ◽  
Malynda A. Cappelle ◽  
Stephen J. Percival ◽  
Leo J. Small ◽  
...  

Electrodialysis (ED) desalination performance of different conventional and laboratory-scale ion exchange membranes (IEMs) has been evaluated by many researchers, but most of these studies used their own sets of experimental parameters such as feed solution compositions and concentrations, superficial velocities of the process streams (diluate, concentrate, and electrode rinse), applied electrical voltages, and types of IEMs. Thus, direct comparison of ED desalination performance of different IEMs is virtually impossible. While the use of different conventional IEMs in ED has been reported, the use of bioinspired ion exchange membrane has not been reported yet. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ED desalination performance differences between novel laboratory‑scale bioinspired IEM and conventional IEMs by determining (i) limiting current density, (ii) current density, (iii) current efficiency, (iv) salinity reduction in diluate stream, (v) normalized specific energy consumption, and (vi) water flux by osmosis as a function of (a) initial concentration of NaCl feed solution (diluate and concentrate streams), (b) superficial velocity of feed solution, and (c) applied stack voltage per cell-pair of membranes. A laboratory‑scale single stage batch-recycle electrodialysis experimental apparatus was assembled with five cell‑pairs of IEMs with an active cross-sectional area of 7.84 cm2. In this study, seven combinations of IEMs (commercial and laboratory-made) were compared: (i) Neosepta AMX/CMX, (ii) PCA PCSA/PCSK, (iii) Fujifilm Type 1 AEM/CEM, (iv) SUEZ AR204SZRA/CR67HMR, (v) Ralex AMH-PES/CMH-PES, (vi) Neosepta AMX/Bare Polycarbonate membrane (Polycarb), and (vii) Neosepta AMX/Sandia novel bioinspired cation exchange membrane (SandiaCEM). ED desalination performance with the Sandia novel bioinspired cation exchange membrane (SandiaCEM) was found to be competitive with commercial Neosepta CMX cation exchange membrane.


2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ghalloussi ◽  
W. Garcia-Vasquez ◽  
N. Bellakhal ◽  
C. Larchet ◽  
L. Dammak ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eliška Stránská ◽  
Kristýna Weinertová ◽  
David Neděla ◽  
Jan Křivčík

This article focuses on the preparation of the heterogeneous ion exchange membrane with a special surface structure made with three types of knitted fabric. The special surface structure of ion exchange membranes can be useful for the intensification of mass transfer processes in electrodialysis.Three types of structured ion exchange membranes were prepared together with a membrane with a flat surface to compare the influence of geometrical structures on the behaviour of ion exchange membrane properties. Electrochemical, mechanical and physical properties were determined. Structured membranes exhibited comparable electrochemical and physical properties to the flat ion exchange membrane. Some transport parameters were measured in an electrodialysis stack with two concentrations of solution. Two electrodialysis stacks with different sizes of active area were used for comparison. Improving efficiency and mass flux was not confirmed. It was not demonstrated that structured IEMs were not better than IEMs with the flat surface.


2006 ◽  
Vol 300 (1) ◽  
pp. 442-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Wakamatsu ◽  
Hidetoshi Matsumoto ◽  
Mie Minagawa ◽  
Akihiko Tanioka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document