scholarly journals Temporal Dynamics of Shifting Visual Attention Between Cerebral Hemispheres

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
I. Mance ◽  
E. Vogel
2011 ◽  
pp. 944-962
Author(s):  
Florian Schmidt-Weigand

This chapter introduces eye tracking as a method to observe how the split of visual attention is managed in multimedia learning. The chapter reviews eye tracking literature on multirepresentational material. A special emphasis is devoted to recent studies conducted to explore viewing behavior in learning from dynamic vs. static visualizations and the matter of pacing of presentation. A presented argument is that the learners’ viewing behavior is affected by design characteristics of the learning material. Characteristics like the dynamics of visualization or the pace of presentation only slightly influence the learners’ visual strategy, while user interaction (i.e., learner controlled pace of presentation) leads to a different visual strategy compared to system-paced presentation. Taking viewing behavior as an indicator of how split attention is managed the harms of a split source format in multimedia learning can be overcome by implementing a user interaction that allows the learner to adapt the material to perceptual and individual characteristics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jongmin Moon ◽  
Seonggyu Choe ◽  
Seul Lee ◽  
Oh-Sang Kwon

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1012.e1-1012.e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Peters ◽  
Anne-Marie Ergis ◽  
Serge Gauthier ◽  
Bénédicte Dieudonné ◽  
Marc Verny ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Zanca ◽  
Marco Gori ◽  
Stefano Melacci ◽  
Alessandra Rufa

Abstract Visual attention refers to the human brain’s ability to select relevant sensory information for preferential processing, improving performance in visual and cognitive tasks. It proceeds in two phases. One in which visual feature maps are acquired and processed in parallel. Another where the information from these maps is merged in order to select a single location to be attended for further and more complex computations and reasoning. Its computational description is challenging, especially if the temporal dynamics of the process are taken into account. Numerous methods to estimate saliency have been proposed in the last 3 decades. They achieve almost perfect performance in estimating saliency at the pixel level, but the way they generate shifts in visual attention fully depends on winner-take-all (WTA) circuitry. WTA is implemented by the biological hardware in order to select a location with maximum saliency, towards which to direct overt attention. In this paper we propose a gravitational model to describe the attentional shifts. Every single feature acts as an attractor and the shifts are the result of the joint effects of the attractors. In the current framework, the assumption of a single, centralized saliency map is no longer necessary, though still plausible. Quantitative results on two large image datasets show that this model predicts shifts more accurately than winner-take-all.


Nature ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 385 (6612) ◽  
pp. 154-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masud Husain ◽  
Kimron Shapiro ◽  
Jesse Martin ◽  
Christopher Kennard

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muriel Boucart ◽  
Nawal Waucquier ◽  
George-Andrew Michael ◽  
Christian Libersa

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e70922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Kashiwase ◽  
Kazumichi Matsumiya ◽  
Ichiro Kuriki ◽  
Satoshi Shioiri

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floor de Groot ◽  
Falk Huettig ◽  
Christian N. L. Olivers

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Szinte ◽  
Donatas Jonikaitis ◽  
Dragan Rangelov ◽  
Heiner Deubel

SummaryEach eye movement shifts the projections of the visual scene on the retina. It has been proposed that the receptive fields of neurons in oculomotor areas are remapped pre-saccadically to account for these shifts. While remapping of the whole visual scene seems prohibitively complex, selection by visual attention may limit these processes to a subset of attended locations. Because attentional selection consumes time, remapping of attended locations should evolve in time, too. In our study, we cued a spatial location by presenting an attention capturing cue at different times before a saccade and constructed detailed maps of attentional allocation across the visual field. We observed no remapping when the cue appeared shortly before saccade. In contrast, when the cue appeared sufficiently early before saccade, attentional resources were reallocated to the remapped location. Our results suggest that pre-saccadic remapping is an attentional process relying on the spatial and temporal dynamics of visual attention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document