scholarly journals A Diagnostic Calculator for Detecting Glaucoma and False Positive Using Cirrus OCT

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Moreno-Montañés ◽  
Marina Leal-Fonseca ◽  
Noelia Oblanca ◽  
Francisco J. Muñoz-Negrete ◽  
Gema Rebolleda
Keyword(s):  
False Positive ◽  
Cirrus Oct

False-positive reactions for porphobilinogen. Detection by butanol extraction and report of a case

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 197 (7) ◽  
pp. 584-586
Author(s):  
M. H. Fine
Keyword(s):  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Reactions ◽  
Butanol Extraction

FTA-ABS test in pregnancy. A probable false-positive reaction

1970 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Positive Reaction ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Reaction ◽  
In Pregnancy

Abstract #53: False-Positive 131I Whole-Body Scan Due to a Lactating Breast in a Patient with Thyroid Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Puneet S. Arora ◽  
Manfred Blum
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Whole Body Scan ◽  
Body Scan ◽  
Lactating Breast

‘False-Positive’ Cath Lab Activation for STEMI Up to 14%

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
MARY ANN MOON
Keyword(s):  
False Positive

Methodological problems arising from false-positive drug-screenings

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Fischer ◽  
S Unterecker ◽  
B Pfuhlmann ◽  
J Deckert
Keyword(s):  
False Positive ◽  
Methodological Problems

Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical findings by Tc-99m HMPAO leukocyte scan

2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Shung-Shung ◽  
S. Yu-Chien ◽  
Y. Mei-Due ◽  
W. Hwei-Chung ◽  
A. Kao
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Pathological Findings ◽  
Lower Quadrant ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Positive Rate

Summary Aim: Even with careful observation, the overall false-positive rate of laparotomy remains 10-15% when acute appendicitis was suspected. Therefore, the clinical efficacy of Tc-99m HMPAO labeled leukocyte (TC-WBC) scan for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients presenting with atypical clinical findings is assessed. Patients and Methods: Eighty patients presenting with acute abdominal pain and possible acute appendicitis but atypical findings were included in this study. After intravenous injection of TC-WBC, serial anterior abdominal/pelvic images at 30, 60, 120 and 240 min with 800k counts were obtained with a gamma camera. Any abnormal localization of radioactivity in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen, equal to or greater than bone marrow activity, was considered as a positive scan. Results: 36 out of 49 patients showing positive TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They all proved to have positive pathological findings. Five positive TC-WBC were not related to acute appendicitis, because of other pathological lesions. Eight patients were not operated and clinical follow-up after one month revealed no acute abdominal condition. Three of 31 patients with negative TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They also presented positive pathological findings. The remaining 28 patients did not receive operations and revealed no evidence of appendicitis after at least one month of follow-up. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values for TC-WBC scan to diagnose acute appendicitis were 92, 78, 86, 82, and 90%, respectively. Conclusion: TC-WBC scan provides a rapid and highly accurate method for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical examination. It proved useful in reducing the false-positive rate of laparotomy and shortens the time necessary for clinical observation.

Predicting Fetal Chromosome Anomalies in the First Trimester Using Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A: A Comparison of Statistical Methods

1993 ◽  
Vol 32 (02) ◽  
pp. 175-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Brambati ◽  
T. Chard ◽  
J. G. Grudzinskas ◽  
M. C. M. Macintosh
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
General Population ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Ratio Method ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Gaussian Distributions ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Likelihood Ratio Method

Abstract:The analysis of the clinical efficiency of a biochemical parameter in the prediction of chromosome anomalies is described, using a database of 475 cases including 30 abnormalities. A comparison was made of two different approaches to the statistical analysis: the use of Gaussian frequency distributions and likelihood ratios, and logistic regression. Both methods computed that for a 5% false-positive rate approximately 60% of anomalies are detected on the basis of maternal age and serum PAPP-A. The logistic regression analysis is appropriate where the outcome variable (chromosome anomaly) is binary and the detection rates refer to the original data only. The likelihood ratio method is used to predict the outcome in the general population. The latter method depends on the data or some transformation of the data fitting a known frequency distribution (Gaussian in this case). The precision of the predicted detection rates is limited by the small sample of abnormals (30 cases). Varying the means and standard deviations (to the limits of their 95% confidence intervals) of the fitted log Gaussian distributions resulted in a detection rate varying between 42% and 79% for a 5% false-positive rate. Thus, although the likelihood ratio method is potentially the better method in determining the usefulness of a test in the general population, larger numbers of abnormal cases are required to stabilise the means and standard deviations of the fitted log Gaussian distributions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document