scholarly journals Implementing TVA as a Bayesian classifier in a foraging task

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2363
Author(s):  
Sofia Tkhan Tin Le ◽  
W.Joseph MacInnes ◽  
Árni Kristjánsson
1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (04/05) ◽  
pp. 349-351
Author(s):  
H. Mizuta ◽  
K. Kawachi ◽  
H. Yoshida ◽  
K. Iida ◽  
Y. Okubo ◽  
...  

Abstract:This paper compares two classifiers: Pseudo Bayesian and Neural Network for assisting in making diagnoses of psychiatric patients based on a simple yes/no questionnaire which is provided at the outpatient’s first visit to the hospital. The classifiers categorize patients into three most commonly seen ICD classes, i.e. schizophrenic, emotional and neurotic disorders. One hundred completed questionnaires were utilized for constructing and evaluating the classifiers. Average correct decision rates were 73.3% for the Pseudo Bayesian Classifier and 77.3% for the Neural Network classifier. These rates were higher than the rate which an experienced psychiatrist achieved based on the same restricted data as the classifiers utilized. These classifiers may be effectively utilized for assisting psychiatrists in making their final diagnoses.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 3080-3083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-mei GAO ◽  
Fang CHEN ◽  
Feng-xi SONG ◽  
Zhong JIN

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (08) ◽  
pp. 1150025 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. LEMMENS ◽  
K. TUYLS

In this paper we present three Swarm Intelligence algorithms which we evaluate on the complex foraging task domain. Each of the algorithms draws inspiration from biologic bee foraging/nest-site selection behavior. The main focus will be on the third algorithm, namely STIGMERGIC LANDMARK FORAGING which is a novel hybrid approach. It combines the high performance of bee-inspired navigation with ant-inspired recruitment. More precisely, navigation is based on Path Integration which results in vectors indicating the distance and direction to a destination. Recruitment only occurs at key locations (i.e., landmarks) inside of the environment. Each landmark contains a collection of vectors with which visiting agents can find their way to a certain goal or to another landmark in an unknown environment. Each vector represents a local segment of a global route. In contrast to ant-inspired recruitment, no attracting or repelling pheromone is used to indicate where to go and how worthwhile a route is in comparison to other routes. Instead, each vector in a landmark has a certain strength indicating how worthwhile it is. In analogy to ant-inspired recruitment, vector strength can be reinforced by visiting agents. Moreover, vector strength decays over time. In the end, this results in optimal routes to destinations. STIGMERGIC LANDMARK FORAGING proves to be very efficient in terms of building and adapting solutions.


2000 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Held ◽  
Michael Mendl ◽  
Claire Devereux ◽  
Richard W. Byrne
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document