The Roles of Equatorial Trapped Waves and Internal Inertia–Gravity Waves in Driving the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation. Part I: Zonal Mean Wave Forcing

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 963-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Kawatani ◽  
Shingo Watanabe ◽  
Kaoru Sato ◽  
Timothy J. Dunkerton ◽  
Saburo Miyahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Wind Shear ◽  
Trapped Waves ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Frequency Spectra ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Zonal Wavenumber ◽  
Internal Inertia ◽  
Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Inertia Gravity Waves

Abstract The roles of equatorial trapped waves (EQWs) and internal inertia–gravity waves in driving the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) are investigated using a high-resolution atmospheric general circulation model with T213L256 resolution (60-km horizontal and 300-m vertical resolution) integrated for three years. The model, which does not use a gravity wave drag parameterization, simulates a QBO. Although the simulated QBO has a shorter period than that of the real atmosphere, its amplitudes and structure in the lower stratosphere are fairly realistic. The zonal wavenumber/frequency spectra of simulated outgoing longwave radiation represent realistic signals of convectively coupled EQWs. Clear signals of EQWs are also seen in the stratospheric wind components. In the eastward wind shear of the QBO, eastward EQWs including Kelvin waves contribute up to ∼25%–50% to the driving of the QBO. The peaks of eastward wave forcing associated with EQWs and internal inertia–gravity waves occur at nearly the same time at the same altitude. On the other hand, westward EQWs contribute up to ∼10% to driving the QBO during the weak westward wind phase but make almost zero contribution during the relatively strong westward wind phase. Extratropical Rossby waves propagating into the equatorial region contribute ∼10%–25%, whereas internal inertia–gravity waves with zonal wavelength ≲1000 km are the main contributors to the westward wind shear phase of the simulated QBO.

The Roles of Equatorial Trapped Waves and Internal Inertia–Gravity Waves in Driving the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation. Part II: Three-Dimensional Distribution of Wave Forcing

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 981-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Kawatani ◽  
Shingo Watanabe ◽  
Kaoru Sato ◽  
Timothy J. Dunkerton ◽  
Saburo Miyahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Wind Shear ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Walker Circulation ◽  
Western Hemisphere ◽  
Flux Divergence ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Internal Inertia ◽  
Inertia Gravity Waves

Abstract Three-dimensional wave forcing of simulated quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) is investigated using a high-resolution atmospheric general circulation model with T213L256 resolution (60-km horizontal and 300-m vertical resolution). In both the eastward and westward wind shear phases of the QBO, nearly all Eliassen–Palm flux (EP flux) divergence due to internal inertia–gravity waves (defined as fluctuations with zonal wavenumber ≥12) results from the divergence of the vertical component of the flux. On the other hand, EP flux divergence due to equatorial trapped waves (EQWs) results from both the meridional and vertical components of the flux in regions of strong vertical wind shear. Longitudinal dependence of wave forcing is also investigated by three-dimensional wave activity flux applicable to gravity waves. Near the top of the Walker circulation, strong eastward (westward) wave forcing occurs in the Eastern (Western) Hemisphere due to internal inertia–gravity waves with small horizontal phase speed. In the eastward wind shear zone associated with the QBO, the eastward wave forcing due to internal inertia–gravity waves in the Eastern Hemisphere is much larger than that in the Western Hemisphere, whereas in the westward wind shear zone, westward wave forcing does not vary much in the zonal direction. Zonal variation of wave forcing in the stratosphere results from (i) zonal variation of wave sources, (ii) the vertically sheared zonal winds associated with the Walker circulation, and (iii) the phase of the QBO.

scholarly journals On the Momentum Budget of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolando R. Garcia ◽  
Jadwiga H. Richter
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Equatorial Waves ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Community Climate Model ◽  
Westerly Jet ◽  
Momentum Budget ◽  
Zonal Wavenumber ◽  
Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Community Climate

Abstract This study documents the contribution of equatorial waves and mesoscale gravity waves to the momentum budget of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in a 110-level version of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model. The model has high vertical resolution, 500 m, above the boundary layer and through the lower and middle stratosphere, decreasing gradually to about 1.5 km near the stratopause. Parameterized mesoscale gravity waves and resolved equatorial waves contribute comparable easterly and westerly accelerations near the equator. Westerly acceleration by resolved waves is due mainly to Kelvin waves of zonal wavenumber in the range k = 1–15 and is broadly distributed about the equator. Easterly acceleration near the equator is due mainly to Rossby–gravity (RG) waves with zonal wavenumbers in the range k = 4–12. These RG waves appear to be generated in situ during both the easterly and westerly phases of the QBO, wherever the meridional curvature of the equatorial westerly jet is large enough to produce reversals of the zonal-mean barotropic vorticity gradient, suggesting that they are excited by the instability of the jet. The RG waves produce a characteristic pattern of Eliassen–Palm flux divergence that includes strong easterly acceleration close to the equator and westerly acceleration farther from the equator, suggesting that the role of the RG waves is to redistribute zonal-mean vorticity such as to neutralize the instability of the westerly jet. Insofar as unstable RG waves might be present in the real atmosphere, mixing due to these waves could have important implications for transport in the tropical stratosphere.

scholarly journals Role of equatorial planetary and gravity waves in the 2015–16 quasi-biennial oscillation disruption

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Rolando R. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Wave Mode ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Rossby Wave Breaking ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. In February 2016, the descent of the westerly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) was unprecedentedly disrupted by the development of easterly winds. Previous studies have shown that extratropical Rossby waves propagating into the deep Tropics were the major cause of the 2015–16 QBO disruption. However, a large portion of the negative momentum forcing associated with the disruption still stems from equatorial planetary and small-scale gravity waves, which calls for detailed analyses by separating each wave mode compared with climatological QBO cases. Here, the contributions of resolved equatorial planetary waves [Kelvin, Rossby, mixed-Rossby gravity (MRG), and inertia-gravity (IG) waves] and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) obtained from an offline CGW parameterization to the 2015–16 QBO disruption are investigated using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data from October 2015 to February 2016. In October and November 2015, anomalously strong negative forcing by MRG and IG waves weakened the QBO jet at 0°–5° S near 40 hPa, leading to Rossby wave breaking at the QBO jet core in the southern hemisphere. From December 2015 to January 2016, exceptionally strong Rossby waves propagating horizontally (vertically) continuously decelerated the southern (northern) flank of the jet. In February 2016, when the westward CGW momentum flux at the source level was much stronger than its climatology, CGWs began to exert considerable negative forcing at 40–50 hPa near the equator, in addition to the Rossby waves. The enhancement of the negative wave forcing in the Tropics stems mostly from strong wave activity in the troposphere associated with increased convective activity and the strong westerlies (or weaker easterlies) in the troposphere, except that the MRG wave forcing is more likely associated with increased barotropic instability in the lower stratosphere.

Small-scale gravity waves influence on an idealized quasi-biennial oscillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Chartrand ◽  
Louis-Philippe Nadeau ◽  
Antoine Venaille
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Wave Spectrum ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Frequency Wave ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Momentum Budget ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

<p>Recent observations from the ERA5 reanalysis have revealed wave contributions from a wide range of spatial and temporal scales to the momentum budget of the equatorial stratosphere. Although it is generally accepted that the wave forcing at the equator drives the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) of equatorial winds, the individual contribution of each type of wave is still poorly understood. Here, we seek to disentangle the role of different wave types in the momentum budget of an idealized stratosphere. Numerical simulations with increasing spatial resolution are used to infer the sensitivity of the wave spectrum and mean flow oscillation to resolved instabilities. At higher resolution, Kelvin-Helmholtz generated small-scale gravity waves are combined to the background low frequency wave forcing and accelerate the period of mean-flow reversals due to an increased momentum transfer from the wave to the mean flow. This mechanism is confirmed using a simplified one-dimensional model for which the wave properties are specified.</p>

scholarly journals Revisiting the Quasi Biennial Oscillation as Seen in ERA5. Part II: Evaluation of Waves and Wave Forcing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid A. Pahlavan ◽  
John M. Wallace ◽  
Qiang Fu ◽  
George N. Kiladis
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Zonal Flow ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Tropical Region ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Zonal Momentum ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

AbstractThis paper describes stratospheric waves in ERA5 reanalysis and evaluates the contributions of different types of waves to the driving of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). Because of its higher spatial resolution compared to its predecessors, ERA5 is capable of resolving a broader spectrum of waves. It is shown that the resolved waves contribute to both eastward and westward accelerations near the equator, mainly by the way of the vertical flux of zonal momentum. The eastward accelerations by the resolved waves are mainly due to Kelvin waves and small-scale gravity (SSG) waves with zonal wavelengths smaller than 2000 km, whereas the westward accelerations are forced mainly by SSG waves, with smaller contributions from inertio-gravity and mixed-Rossby-gravity waves. Extratropical Rossby waves disperse upward and equatorward into the tropical region and impart a westward acceleration to the zonal flow. They appear to be responsible for at least some of the irregularities in the QBO cycle.

scholarly journals Contributions of equatorial waves and small-scale convective gravity waves to the 2019/20 quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) disruption

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 9839-9857
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Wave ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Equatorial Waves ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Equatorial Wave ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. In January 2020, unexpected easterly winds developed in the downward-propagating westerly quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) phase. This event corresponds to the second QBO disruption in history, and it occurred 4 years after the first disruption of 2015/16. According to several previous studies, strong midlatitude Rossby waves propagating from the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during the SH winter likely initiated the disruption; nevertheless, the wave forcing that finally led to the disruption has not been investigated. In this study, we examine the role of equatorial waves and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) in the 2019/20 QBO disruption using Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) global reanalysis data. In June–September 2019, unusually strong Rossby wave forcing originating from the SH decelerated the westerly QBO at 0–5∘ N at ∼50 hPa. In October–November 2019, vertically (horizontally) propagating Rossby waves and mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG) waves began to increase (decrease). From December 2019, the contribution of the MRG wave forcing to the zonal wind deceleration was the largest, followed by the Rossby wave forcing originating from the Northern Hemisphere and the equatorial troposphere. In January 2020, CGWs provided 11 % of the total negative wave forcing at ∼43 hPa. Inertia–gravity (IG) waves exhibited a moderate contribution to the negative forcing throughout. Although the zonal mean precipitation was not significantly larger than the climatology, convectively coupled equatorial wave activities were increased during the 2019/20 disruption. As in the 2015/16 QBO disruption, the increased barotropic instability at the QBO edges generated more MRG waves at 70–90 hPa, and westerly anomalies in the upper troposphere allowed more westward IG waves and CGWs to propagate to the stratosphere. Combining the 2015/16 and 2019/20 disruption cases, Rossby waves and MRG waves can be considered the key factors inducing QBO disruption.

scholarly journals Role of equatorial waves and convective gravity waves in the 2015/16 quasi-biennial oscillation disruption

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (23) ◽  
pp. 14669-14693
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Rolando R. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Wave Mode ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. In February 2016, the descent of the westerly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) was unprecedentedly disrupted by the development of easterly winds. Previous studies have shown that extratropical Rossby waves propagating into the deep tropics were the major cause of the 2015/16 QBO disruption. However, a large portion of the negative momentum forcing associated with the disruption still stems from equatorial planetary and small-scale gravity waves, which calls for detailed analyses by separating each wave mode compared with climatological QBO cases. Here, the contributions of resolved equatorial planetary waves (Kelvin, Rossby, mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG), and inertia–gravity (IG) waves) and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) obtained from an offline CGW parameterization to the 2015/16 QBO disruption are investigated using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data from October 2015 to February 2016. In October and November 2015, anomalously strong negative forcing by MRG and IG waves weakened the QBO jet at 0–5∘ S near 40 hPa, leading to Rossby wave breaking at the QBO jet core in the Southern Hemisphere. From December 2015 to January 2016, exceptionally strong Rossby waves propagating horizontally (vertically) continuously decelerated the southern (northern) flank of the jet. In February 2016, when the westward CGW momentum flux at the source level was much stronger than its climatology, CGWs began to exert considerable negative forcing at 40–50 hPa near the Equator, in addition to the Rossby waves. The enhancement of the negative wave forcing in the tropics stems mostly from strong wave activity in the troposphere associated with increased convective activity and the strong westerlies (or weaker easterlies) in the troposphere, except that the MRG wave forcing is more likely associated with increased barotropic instability in the lower stratosphere.

scholarly journals Driving of the SAO by gravity waves as observed from satellite

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ern ◽  
P. Preusse ◽  
M. Riese
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Wave ◽  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Wind Shear ◽  
Critical Level ◽  
Wave Drag ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Momentum Budget ◽  
The Tropics

Abstract. It is known that atmospheric dynamics in the tropical stratosphere have an influence on higher altitudes and latitudes as well as on surface weather and climate. In the tropics, the dynamics are governed by an interplay of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and semiannual oscillation (SAO) of the zonal wind. The QBO is dominant in the lower and middle stratosphere, and the SAO in the upper stratosphere/lower mesosphere. For both QBO and SAO the driving by atmospheric waves plays an important role. In particular, the role of gravity waves is still not well understood. In our study we use observations of the High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) satellite instrument to derive gravity wave momentum fluxes and gravity wave drag in order to investigate the interaction of gravity waves with the SAO. These observations are compared with the ERA-Interim reanalysis. Usually, QBO westward winds are much stronger than QBO eastward winds. Therefore, mainly gravity waves with westward-directed phase speeds are filtered out through critical-level filtering already below the stratopause region. Accordingly, HIRDLS observations show that gravity waves contribute to the SAO momentum budget mainly during eastward wind shear, and not much during westward wind shear. These findings confirm theoretical expectations and are qualitatively in good agreement with ERA-Interim and other modeling studies. In ERA-Interim most of the westward SAO driving is due to planetary waves, likely of extratropical origin. Still, we find in both observations and ERA-Interim that sometimes westward-propagating gravity waves may contribute to the westward driving of the SAO. Four characteristic cases of atmospheric background conditions are identified. The forcings of the SAO in these cases are discussed in detail, supported by gravity wave spectra observed by HIRDLS. In particular, we find that the gravity wave forcing of the SAO cannot be explained by critical-level filtering alone; gravity wave saturation without critical levels being reached is also important.

scholarly journals Contributions of equatorial planetary waves and small-scale convective gravity waves to the 2019/20 QBO disruption

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Wave ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Equatorial Wave ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

Abstract. In January 2020, unexpected easterly winds developed in the downward-propagating westerly quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) phase. This event corresponds to the second QBO disruption in history, and it occurred four years after the first disruption that occurred in 2015/16. According to several previous studies, strong midlatitude Rossby waves propagating from the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during the SH winter likely initiated the disruption; nevertheless, the wave forcing that finally led to the disruption has not been investigated. In this study, we examine the role of equatorial waves and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) in the 2019/20 QBO disruption using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data. In June–September 2019, unusually strong Rossby wave forcing originating from the SH decelerated the westerly QBO at 0°–5° N at ~50 hPa. In October–November 2019, vertically (horizontally) propagating Rossby waves and mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG) waves began to increase (decrease). From December 2019, contribution of the MRG wave forcing to the zonal wind deceleration was the largest, followed by the Rossby wave forcing originating from the Northern Hemisphere and the equatorial troposphere. In January 2020, CGWs provided 11 % of the total negative wave forcing at ~43 hPa. Inertia–gravity (IG) waves exhibited a moderate contribution to the negative forcing throughout. Although the zonal-mean precipitation was not significantly larger than the climatology, convectively coupled equatorial wave activities were increased during the 2019/20 disruption. As in the 2015/16 QBO disruption, the increased barotropic instability at the QBO edges generated more MRG waves at 70–90 hPa, and westerly anomalies in the upper troposphere allowed more westward IG waves and CGWs to propagate to the stratosphere. Combining the 2015/16 and 2019/20 disruption cases, Rossby waves and MRG waves can be considered the key factors inducing QBO disruption.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document