scholarly journals Contributions of equatorial planetary waves and small-scale convective gravity waves to the 2019/20 QBO disruption

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Wave ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Equatorial Wave ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

Abstract. In January 2020, unexpected easterly winds developed in the downward-propagating westerly quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) phase. This event corresponds to the second QBO disruption in history, and it occurred four years after the first disruption that occurred in 2015/16. According to several previous studies, strong midlatitude Rossby waves propagating from the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during the SH winter likely initiated the disruption; nevertheless, the wave forcing that finally led to the disruption has not been investigated. In this study, we examine the role of equatorial waves and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) in the 2019/20 QBO disruption using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data. In June–September 2019, unusually strong Rossby wave forcing originating from the SH decelerated the westerly QBO at 0°–5° N at ~50 hPa. In October–November 2019, vertically (horizontally) propagating Rossby waves and mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG) waves began to increase (decrease). From December 2019, contribution of the MRG wave forcing to the zonal wind deceleration was the largest, followed by the Rossby wave forcing originating from the Northern Hemisphere and the equatorial troposphere. In January 2020, CGWs provided 11 % of the total negative wave forcing at ~43 hPa. Inertia–gravity (IG) waves exhibited a moderate contribution to the negative forcing throughout. Although the zonal-mean precipitation was not significantly larger than the climatology, convectively coupled equatorial wave activities were increased during the 2019/20 disruption. As in the 2015/16 QBO disruption, the increased barotropic instability at the QBO edges generated more MRG waves at 70–90 hPa, and westerly anomalies in the upper troposphere allowed more westward IG waves and CGWs to propagate to the stratosphere. Combining the 2015/16 and 2019/20 disruption cases, Rossby waves and MRG waves can be considered the key factors inducing QBO disruption.

scholarly journals Contributions of equatorial waves and small-scale convective gravity waves to the 2019/20 quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) disruption

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 9839-9857
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Wave ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Equatorial Waves ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Equatorial Wave ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. In January 2020, unexpected easterly winds developed in the downward-propagating westerly quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) phase. This event corresponds to the second QBO disruption in history, and it occurred 4 years after the first disruption of 2015/16. According to several previous studies, strong midlatitude Rossby waves propagating from the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during the SH winter likely initiated the disruption; nevertheless, the wave forcing that finally led to the disruption has not been investigated. In this study, we examine the role of equatorial waves and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) in the 2019/20 QBO disruption using Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) global reanalysis data. In June–September 2019, unusually strong Rossby wave forcing originating from the SH decelerated the westerly QBO at 0–5∘ N at ∼50 hPa. In October–November 2019, vertically (horizontally) propagating Rossby waves and mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG) waves began to increase (decrease). From December 2019, the contribution of the MRG wave forcing to the zonal wind deceleration was the largest, followed by the Rossby wave forcing originating from the Northern Hemisphere and the equatorial troposphere. In January 2020, CGWs provided 11 % of the total negative wave forcing at ∼43 hPa. Inertia–gravity (IG) waves exhibited a moderate contribution to the negative forcing throughout. Although the zonal mean precipitation was not significantly larger than the climatology, convectively coupled equatorial wave activities were increased during the 2019/20 disruption. As in the 2015/16 QBO disruption, the increased barotropic instability at the QBO edges generated more MRG waves at 70–90 hPa, and westerly anomalies in the upper troposphere allowed more westward IG waves and CGWs to propagate to the stratosphere. Combining the 2015/16 and 2019/20 disruption cases, Rossby waves and MRG waves can be considered the key factors inducing QBO disruption.

Role of equatorial waves and convective gravity waves in the 2015/16 QBO disruption

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Rolando Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Wave Mode ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

<p>In winter 2015/2016, the descent of the westerly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) was unprecedentedly disrupted by the development of easterly winds. Previous studies have shown that extratropical Rossby waves propagating into the tropics were the major cause of the 2015/16 QBO disruption. However, a large portion of the negative momentum forcing driving the disruption still stems from equatorial planetary and gravity waves, which calls for detailed analyses by separating each wave mode. In this study, the contributions of resolved equatorial planetary waves (Kelvin, Rossby, mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG), and inertia–gravity (IG) waves) and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) obtained from an offline CGW parameterization to the 2015/16 QBO disruption are investigated using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data. In October and November 2015, anomalously strong negative forcing by MRG and IG waves weakened the QBO jet at 0–5°S near 40 hPa, possibly leading to Rossby wave breaking at the QBO jet core in the Southern Hemisphere. From December 2015 to January 2016, strong Rossby waves propagating horizontally (vertically) from the Northern Hemisphere (troposphere) decelerated the southern (northern) flank of the jet. In February 2016, when the westward CGW momentum flux at the source level was much stronger than the climatology, CGWs began to exert considerable negative forcing at 40–50 hPa near the Equator, in addition to the Rossby waves. The enhancement of the negative wave forcing in the tropics stems mostly from strong wave activity in the troposphere associated with increased convective activity and the westerly anomalies in the troposphere, except that the MRG wave forcing is more likely associated with increased barotropic instability in the lower stratosphere.</p>

scholarly journals Role of equatorial waves and convective gravity waves in the 2015/16 quasi-biennial oscillation disruption

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (23) ◽  
pp. 14669-14693
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Rolando R. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Wave Mode ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. In February 2016, the descent of the westerly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) was unprecedentedly disrupted by the development of easterly winds. Previous studies have shown that extratropical Rossby waves propagating into the deep tropics were the major cause of the 2015/16 QBO disruption. However, a large portion of the negative momentum forcing associated with the disruption still stems from equatorial planetary and small-scale gravity waves, which calls for detailed analyses by separating each wave mode compared with climatological QBO cases. Here, the contributions of resolved equatorial planetary waves (Kelvin, Rossby, mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG), and inertia–gravity (IG) waves) and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) obtained from an offline CGW parameterization to the 2015/16 QBO disruption are investigated using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data from October 2015 to February 2016. In October and November 2015, anomalously strong negative forcing by MRG and IG waves weakened the QBO jet at 0–5∘ S near 40 hPa, leading to Rossby wave breaking at the QBO jet core in the Southern Hemisphere. From December 2015 to January 2016, exceptionally strong Rossby waves propagating horizontally (vertically) continuously decelerated the southern (northern) flank of the jet. In February 2016, when the westward CGW momentum flux at the source level was much stronger than its climatology, CGWs began to exert considerable negative forcing at 40–50 hPa near the Equator, in addition to the Rossby waves. The enhancement of the negative wave forcing in the tropics stems mostly from strong wave activity in the troposphere associated with increased convective activity and the strong westerlies (or weaker easterlies) in the troposphere, except that the MRG wave forcing is more likely associated with increased barotropic instability in the lower stratosphere.

scholarly journals Role of equatorial planetary and gravity waves in the 2015–16 quasi-biennial oscillation disruption

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Rolando R. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Wave Mode ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Rossby Wave Breaking ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. In February 2016, the descent of the westerly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) was unprecedentedly disrupted by the development of easterly winds. Previous studies have shown that extratropical Rossby waves propagating into the deep Tropics were the major cause of the 2015–16 QBO disruption. However, a large portion of the negative momentum forcing associated with the disruption still stems from equatorial planetary and small-scale gravity waves, which calls for detailed analyses by separating each wave mode compared with climatological QBO cases. Here, the contributions of resolved equatorial planetary waves [Kelvin, Rossby, mixed-Rossby gravity (MRG), and inertia-gravity (IG) waves] and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) obtained from an offline CGW parameterization to the 2015–16 QBO disruption are investigated using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data from October 2015 to February 2016. In October and November 2015, anomalously strong negative forcing by MRG and IG waves weakened the QBO jet at 0°–5° S near 40 hPa, leading to Rossby wave breaking at the QBO jet core in the southern hemisphere. From December 2015 to January 2016, exceptionally strong Rossby waves propagating horizontally (vertically) continuously decelerated the southern (northern) flank of the jet. In February 2016, when the westward CGW momentum flux at the source level was much stronger than its climatology, CGWs began to exert considerable negative forcing at 40–50 hPa near the equator, in addition to the Rossby waves. The enhancement of the negative wave forcing in the Tropics stems mostly from strong wave activity in the troposphere associated with increased convective activity and the strong westerlies (or weaker easterlies) in the troposphere, except that the MRG wave forcing is more likely associated with increased barotropic instability in the lower stratosphere.

scholarly journals Momentum Flux of Convective Gravity Waves Derived from an Offline Gravity Wave Parameterization. Part II: Impacts on the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 3753-3775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Young-Ha Kim ◽  
Peter Preusse ◽  
Manfred Ern
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zone ◽  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Momentum Flux ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Equatorial Region ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract The characteristics of small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs; horizontal wavelengths <100 km) and their contributions to the large-scale flow in the stratosphere, including the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), are investigated using an offline calculation of a source-dependent, physically based CGW parameterization with global reanalysis data from 1979 to 2010. The CGW momentum flux (CGWMF) and CGW drag (CGWD) are calculated from the cloud top (source level) to the upper stratosphere using a Lindzen-type wave propagation scheme. The 32-yr-mean CGWD exhibits large magnitudes in the tropical upper stratosphere and near the stratospheric polar night jet (~60°). The maximum positive drag is 0.1 (1.5) m s−1 day−1, and the maximum negative drag is −0.9 (−0.7) m s−1 day−1 in January (July) between 3 and 1 hPa. In the tropics, the momentum forcing by CGWs at 30 hPa associated with the QBO in the westerly shear zone is 3.5–6 m s−1 month−1, which is smaller than that by Kelvin waves, while that by CGWs in the easterly shear zone (3.1–6 m s−1 month−1) is greater than that by any other equatorial planetary waves or inertio-gravity waves (inertio-GWs). Composite analyses of the easterly QBO (EQBO) and westerly QBO (WQBO) phases reveal that the zonal CGWMF is concentrated near 10°N and that the negative (positive) CGWD extends latitudinally to ±20° (±10°) at 30 hPa. The strongest (weakest) negative CGWD is in March–May (September–November) during the EQBO, and the strongest (weakest) positive CGWD is in June–August (March–May) during the WQBO. The CGWMF and CGWD are generally stronger during El Niño than during La Niña in the equatorial region.

scholarly journals Revisiting the Quasi Biennial Oscillation as Seen in ERA5. Part II: Evaluation of Waves and Wave Forcing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid A. Pahlavan ◽  
John M. Wallace ◽  
Qiang Fu ◽  
George N. Kiladis
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Zonal Flow ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Tropical Region ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Zonal Momentum ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

AbstractThis paper describes stratospheric waves in ERA5 reanalysis and evaluates the contributions of different types of waves to the driving of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). Because of its higher spatial resolution compared to its predecessors, ERA5 is capable of resolving a broader spectrum of waves. It is shown that the resolved waves contribute to both eastward and westward accelerations near the equator, mainly by the way of the vertical flux of zonal momentum. The eastward accelerations by the resolved waves are mainly due to Kelvin waves and small-scale gravity (SSG) waves with zonal wavelengths smaller than 2000 km, whereas the westward accelerations are forced mainly by SSG waves, with smaller contributions from inertio-gravity and mixed-Rossby-gravity waves. Extratropical Rossby waves disperse upward and equatorward into the tropical region and impart a westward acceleration to the zonal flow. They appear to be responsible for at least some of the irregularities in the QBO cycle.

Small-scale gravity waves influence on an idealized quasi-biennial oscillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Chartrand ◽  
Louis-Philippe Nadeau ◽  
Antoine Venaille
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Wave Spectrum ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Frequency Wave ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Momentum Budget ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

<p>Recent observations from the ERA5 reanalysis have revealed wave contributions from a wide range of spatial and temporal scales to the momentum budget of the equatorial stratosphere. Although it is generally accepted that the wave forcing at the equator drives the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) of equatorial winds, the individual contribution of each type of wave is still poorly understood. Here, we seek to disentangle the role of different wave types in the momentum budget of an idealized stratosphere. Numerical simulations with increasing spatial resolution are used to infer the sensitivity of the wave spectrum and mean flow oscillation to resolved instabilities. At higher resolution, Kelvin-Helmholtz generated small-scale gravity waves are combined to the background low frequency wave forcing and accelerate the period of mean-flow reversals due to an increased momentum transfer from the wave to the mean flow. This mechanism is confirmed using a simplified one-dimensional model for which the wave properties are specified.</p>

scholarly journals Stratospheric ozone and quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) interaction with the tropical troposphere on intraseasonal and interannual timescales: a normal-mode perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-101
Author(s):  
Breno Raphaldini ◽  
André S. W. Teruya ◽  
Pedro Leite da Silva Dias ◽  
Lucas Massaroppe ◽  
Daniel Yasumasa Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Normal Mode ◽  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Normal Modes ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wind Structure ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. The Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is the main controller of the weather in the tropics on intraseasonal timescales, and recent research provides evidence that the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) influences the MJO interannual variability. However, the physical mechanisms behind this interaction are not completely understood. Recent studies on the normal-mode structure of the MJO indicate the contribution of global-scale Kelvin and Rossby waves. In this study we test whether these MJO-related normal modes are affected by the QBO and stratospheric ozone. The partial directed coherence method was used and enabled us to probe the direction and frequency of the interactions. It was found that equatorial stratospheric ozone and stratospheric zonal winds are connected with the MJO at periods of 1–2 months and 1.5–2.5 years. We explore the role of normal-mode interactions behind the stratosphere–troposphere coupling by performing a linear regression between the MJO–QBO indices and the amplitudes of the normal modes of the atmosphere obtained by projections on a normal-mode basis using ERA-Interim reanalysis data. The MJO is dominated by symmetric Rossby modes but is also influenced by Kelvin and asymmetric Rossby modes. The QBO is mostly explained by westward-propagating inertio-gravity waves and asymmetric Rossby waves. We explore the previous results by identifying interactions between those modes and between the modes and the ozone concentration. In particular, westward inertio-gravity waves, associated with the QBO, influence the MJO on interannual timescales. MJO-related modes, such as Kelvin waves and Rossby waves with a symmetric wind structure with respect to the Equator, are shown to have significantly different dynamics during MJO events depending on the phase of the QBO.

scholarly journals Relation Between the Interannual Variability in the Stratospheric Rossby Wave Forcing and Zonal Mean Fields Suggesting an Interhemispheric Link in the Stratosphere

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Matsushita ◽  
Daiki Kado ◽  
Masashi Kohma ◽  
Kaoru Sato
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Rossby Wave ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Flux Divergence ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Mean Fields ◽  
Meridional Cross Section ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Modern Era

Abstract. Focusing on the interannual variabilities in the zonal mean fields and Rossby wave forcing in austral winter, an interhemispheric coupling in the stratosphere is examined using reanalysis data: the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). In the present study, the Eliassen-Palm (EP) flux divergence averaged over the latitude and height regions of 50°–30° S and 0.3–1 hPa, respectively, are used as a proxy of the Rossby wave forcing, where the absolute value of the EP flux divergence is maximized in the winter in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). The interannual variabilities in the zonal mean temperature and zonal wind are significantly correlated with the SH Rossby wave forcing in the stratosphere in both the SH and Northern Hemisphere (NH). The interannual variability in the strength of the poleward residual mean flow in the SH stratosphere is also correlated with the strength of the wave forcing. This correlation is significant even around the equator at an altitude of 40 km and at NH low latitudes of 20–40 km. The temperature anomaly is consistent with this residual mean flow anomaly. The relationship between the cross-equatorial flow and the zonal mean absolute angular momentum gradient (My) is examined in the meridional cross section. The My around the equator at the altitude of 40 km is small when the wave forcing is strong, which provides a pathway for the cross-equatorial residual mean flow. These results indicate that an interhemispheric coupling is present in the stratosphere through the meridional circulation modulated by the Rossby wave forcing.

scholarly journals Tropical Waves and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in a 7-km Global Climate Simulation

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 3771-3783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Holt ◽  
M. Joan Alexander ◽  
Lawrence Coy ◽  
Andrea Molod ◽  
William Putman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Tropical Waves ◽  
Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Very High

Abstract This study investigates tropical waves and their role in driving a quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO)-like signal in stratospheric winds in a global 7-km-horizontal-resolution atmospheric general circulation model. The Nature Run (NR) is a 2-yr global mesoscale simulation of the Goddard Earth Observing System Model, version 5 (GEOS-5). In the tropics, there is evidence that the NR supports a broad range of convectively generated waves. The NR precipitation spectrum resembles the observed spectrum in many aspects, including the preference for westward-propagating waves. However, even with very high horizontal resolution and a healthy population of resolved waves, the zonal force provided by the resolved waves is still too low in the QBO region and parameterized gravity wave drag is the main driver of the NR QBO-like oscillation (NR-QBO). The authors suggest that causes include coarse vertical resolution and excessive dissipation. Nevertheless, the very-high-resolution NR provides an opportunity to analyze the resolved wave forcing of the NR-QBO. In agreement with previous studies, large-scale Kelvin and small-scale waves contribute to the NR-QBO driving in eastward shear zones and small-scale waves dominate the NR-QBO driving in westward shear zones. Waves with zonal wavelength < 1000 km account for up to half of the small-scale (<3300 km) resolved wave forcing in eastward shear zones and up to 70% of the small-scale resolved wave forcing in westward shear zones of the NR-QBO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document