A Comparison of Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling of Winter Precipitation over Complex Terrain

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 262-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan D. Gutmann ◽  
Roy M. Rasmussen ◽  
Changhai Liu ◽  
Kyoko Ikeda ◽  
David J. Gochis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Downscaling ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Meteorological Variables ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Spatial Distributions ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Statistical downscaling is widely used to improve spatial and/or temporal distributions of meteorological variables from regional and global climate models. This downscaling is important because climate models are spatially coarse (50–200 km) and often misrepresent extremes in important meteorological variables, such as temperature and precipitation. However, these downscaling methods rely on current estimates of the spatial distributions of these variables and largely assume that the small-scale spatial distribution will not change significantly in a modified climate. In this study the authors compare data typically used to derive spatial distributions of precipitation [Parameter-Elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM)] to a high-resolution (2 km) weather model [Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF)] under the current climate in the mountains of Colorado. It is shown that there are regions of significant difference in November–May precipitation totals (>300 mm) between the two, and possible causes for these differences are discussed. A simple statistical downscaling is then presented that is based on the 2-km WRF data applied to a series of regional climate models [North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP)], and the downscaled precipitation data are validated with observations at 65 snow telemetry (SNOTEL) sites throughout Colorado for the winter seasons from 1988 to 2000. The authors also compare statistically downscaled precipitation from a 36-km model under an imposed warming scenario with dynamically downscaled data from a 2-km model using the same forcing data. Although the statistical downscaling improved the domain-average precipitation relative to the original 36-km model, the changes in the spatial pattern of precipitation did not match the changes in the dynamically downscaled 2-km model. This study illustrates some of the uncertainties in applying statistical downscaling to future climate.

scholarly journals Differences between downscaling with spectral and grid nudging using WRF

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 3601-3610 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Liu ◽  
A. P. Tsimpidi ◽  
Y. Hu ◽  
B. Stone ◽  
A. G. Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Spectral Nudging

Abstract. Dynamical downscaling has been extensively used to study regional climate forced by large-scale global climate models. During the downscaling process, however, the simulation of regional climate models (RCMs) tends to drift away from the driving fields. Developing a solution that addresses this issue, by retaining the large scale features (from the large-scale fields) and the small-scale features (from the RCMs) has led to the development of "nudging" techniques. Here, we examine the performance of two nudging techniques, grid and spectral nudging, in the downscaling of NCEP/NCAR data with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The simulations are compared against the results with North America Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data set at different scales of interest using the concept of similarity. We show that with the appropriate choice of wave numbers, spectral nudging outperforms grid nudging in the capacity of balancing the performance of simulation at the large and small scales.

Empirical-Statistical Downscaling: Nonlinear Statistical Downscaling

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristita Busuioc ◽  
Alexandru Dumitrescu
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Statistical Downscaling ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Local Climate

This is an advance summary of a forthcoming article in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Please check back later for the full article.The concept of statistical downscaling or empirical-statistical downscaling became a distinct and important scientific approach in climate science in recent decades, when the climate change issue and assessment of climate change impact on various social and natural systems have become international challenges. Global climate models are the best tools for estimating future climate conditions. Even if improvements can be made in state-of-the art global climate models, in terms of spatial resolution and their performance in simulation of climate characteristics, they are still skillful only in reproducing large-scale feature of climate variability, such as global mean temperature or various circulation patterns (e.g., the North Atlantic Oscillation). However, these models are not able to provide reliable information on local climate characteristics (mean temperature, total precipitation), especially on extreme weather and climate events. The main reason for this failure is the influence of local geographical features on the local climate, as well as other factors related to surrounding large-scale conditions, the influence of which cannot be correctly taken into consideration by the current dynamical global models.Impact models, such as hydrological and crop models, need high resolution information on various climate parameters on the scale of a river basin or a farm, scales that are not available from the usual global climate models. Downscaling techniques produce regional climate information on finer scale, from global climate change scenarios, based on the assumption that there is a systematic link between the large-scale and local climate. Two types of downscaling approaches are known: a) dynamical downscaling is based on regional climate models nested in a global climate model; and b) statistical downscaling is based on developing statistical relationships between large-scale atmospheric variables (predictors), available from global climate models, and observed local-scale variables of interest (predictands).Various types of empirical-statistical downscaling approaches can be placed approximately in linear and nonlinear groupings. The empirical-statistical downscaling techniques focus more on details related to the nonlinear models—their validation, strengths, and weaknesses—in comparison to linear models or the mixed models combining the linear and nonlinear approaches. Stochastic models can be applied to daily and sub-daily precipitation in Romania, with a comparison to dynamical downscaling. Conditional stochastic models are generally specific for daily or sub-daily precipitation as predictand.A complex validation of the nonlinear statistical downscaling models, selection of the large-scale predictors, model ability to reproduce historical trends, extreme events, and the uncertainty related to future downscaled changes are important issues. A better estimation of the uncertainty related to downscaled climate change projections can be achieved by using ensembles of more global climate models as drivers, including their ability to simulate the input in downscaling models. Comparison between future statistical downscaled climate signals and those derived from dynamical downscaling driven by the same global model, including a complex validation of the regional climate models, gives a measure of the reliability of downscaled regional climate changes.

scholarly journals Differences between downscaling with spectral and grid nudging using WRF

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1191-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Liu ◽  
A. P. Tsimpidi ◽  
Y. Hu ◽  
B. Stone ◽  
A. G. Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Spectral Nudging

Abstract. Dynamical downscaling has been extensively used to study regional climate forced by large-scale global climate models. During the downscaling process, however, the simulation of regional climate models (RCMs) tends to drift away from the driving fields. Developing a solution that addresses this issue, by retaining the large scale features (from the large-scale fields) and the small-scale features (from the RCMs) has led to the development of "nudging" techniques. Here, we examine the performance of two nudging techniques, grid and spectral nudging, in the downscaling of NCEP/NCAR data using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The simulations are compared against the results with North America Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data set at different scales of interest. We show that with the appropriate choice of wave numbers, spectral nudging outperforms grid nudging in the capacity of balancing the performance of simulation at the large and small scales.

scholarly journals Comparing dynamical, stochastic and combined downscaling approaches – lessons from a case study in the Mediterranean region

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 9847-9884
Author(s):  
N. Guyennon ◽  
E. Romano ◽  
I. Portoghese ◽  
F. Salerno ◽  
S. Calmanti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Downscaling ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Maximum Temperature ◽  
Max Planck ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Quantile Transform

Abstract. Various downscaling techniques have been developed to bridge the scale gap between global climate models (GCMs) and finer scales required to assess hydrological impacts of climate change. Such techniques may be grouped into two downscaling approaches: the deterministic dynamical downscaling (DD) and the stochastic statistical downscaling (SD). Although SD has been traditionally seen as an alternative to DD, recent works on statistical downscaling have aimed to combine the benefits of these two approaches. The overall objective of this study is to examine the relative benefits of each downscaling approach and their combination in making the GCM scenarios suitable for basin scale hydrological applications. The case study presented here focuses on the Apulia region (South East of Italy, surface area about 20 000 km2), characterized by a typical Mediterranean climate; the monthly cumulated precipitation and monthly mean of daily minimum and maximum temperature distribution were examined for the period 1953–2000. The fifth-generation ECHAM model from the Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology was adopted as GCM. The DD was carried out with the Protheus system (ENEA), while the SD was performed through a monthly quantile-quantile transform. The SD resulted efficient in reducing the mean bias in the spatial distribution at both annual and seasonal scales, but it was not able to correct the miss-modeled non-stationary components of the GCM dynamics. The DD provided a partial correction by enhancing the trend spatial heterogeneity and time evolution predicted by the GCM, although the comparison with observations resulted still underperforming. The best results were obtained through the combination of both DD and SD approaches.

Projected precipitation changes over China for global warming levels at 1.5°C and 2°C in an ensemble of regional climate simulations: Impact of bias-correction algorithms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianyi Guo
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cumulative Distribution ◽  
Mathematical Framework

<p>Four bias-correction methods, i.e. Gamma Cumulative Distribution Function (GamCDF), Quantile-Quantile Adjustment (QQadj), Equidistant CDF Matching (EDCDF) and Transform CDF (CDF-t), were applied to five daily precipitation datasets over China produced by LMDZ4-regional that was nested into five global climate models (GCMs), BCC-CSM1-1m, CNRM-CM5, FGOALS-g2, IPSL-CM5A-MR and MPI-ESM-MR, respectively. A unified mathematical framework can be used to define the four methods, which helps understanding their nature and essence in identifying the most reliable probability distributions of projected climate. CDF-t is shown to be the best bias-correction algorithm based on a comprehensive evaluation of different rainfall indices. Future precipitation projections corresponds to the global warming levels of 1.5°C and 2°C under RCP8.5 were obtained using the bias correction methods. The multi-algorithm and multi-model ensemble characteristics allow to explore the spreading of results, considered as a surrogate of climate projection uncertainty, and to attribute such uncertainties to different sources. It was found that the spread among bias-correction methods is smaller than that among dynamical downscaling simulations. The four bias-correction methods with CDF-t at the top all reduce the spread among the downscaled results. Future projection using CDF-t is thus considered having higher credibility.</p>

scholarly journals Stochastic Rainfall Downscaling of Climate Models

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 830-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D’Onofrio ◽  
E. Palazzi ◽  
J. von Hardenberg ◽  
A. Provenzale ◽  
S. Calmanti
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Amplitude Distribution ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Stochastic Downscaling

Abstract Precipitation extremes and small-scale variability are essential drivers in many climate change impact studies. However, the spatial resolution currently achieved by global climate models (GCMs) and regional climate models (RCMs) is still insufficient to correctly identify the fine structure of precipitation intensity fields. In the absence of a proper physically based representation, this scale gap can be at least temporarily bridged by adopting a stochastic rainfall downscaling technique. In this work, a precipitation downscaling chain is introduced where the global 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) (at about 120-km resolution) is dynamically downscaled using the Protheus RCM at 30-km resolution. The RCM precipitation is then further downscaled using a stochastic downscaling technique, the Rainfall Filtered Autoregressive Model (RainFARM), which has been extended for application to long climate simulations. The application of the stochastic downscaling technique directly to the larger-scale reanalysis field at about 120-km resolution is also discussed. To assess the ability of this approach in reproducing the main statistical properties of precipitation, the downscaled model results are compared with the precipitation data provided by a dense network of 122 rain gauges in northwestern Italy, in the time period from 1958 to 2001. The high-resolution precipitation fields obtained by stochastically downscaling the RCM outputs reproduce well the seasonality and amplitude distribution of the observed precipitation during most of the year, including extreme events and variance. In addition, the RainFARM outputs compare more favorably to observations when the procedure is applied to the RCM output rather than to the global reanalyses, highlighting the added value of reaching high enough resolution with a dynamical model.

Statistical Downscaling for Climate Science

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Maraun
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Downscaling ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Climatic Changes ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Climate Projections

Global climate models are our main tool to generate quantitative climate projections, but these models do not resolve the effects of complex topography, regional scale atmospheric processes and small-scale extreme events. To understand potential regional climatic changes, and to provide information for regional-scale impact modeling and adaptation planning, downscaling approaches have been developed. Regional climate change modeling, even though it is still a matter of basic research and questioned by many researchers, is urged to provide operational results. One major downscaling class is statistical downscaling, which exploits empirical relationships between larger-scale and local weather. The main statistical downscaling approaches are perfect prog (often referred to as empirical statistical downscaling), model output statistics (which is typically some sort of bias correction), and weather generators. Statistical downscaling complements or adds to dynamical downscaling and is useful to generate user-tailored local-scale information, or to efficiently generate regional scale information about mean climatic changes from large global climate model ensembles. Further research is needed to assess to what extent the assumptions underlying statistical downscaling are met in typical applications, and to develop new methods for generating spatially coherent projections, and for including process-understanding in bias correction. The increasing resolution of global climate models will improve the representation of downscaling predictors and will, therefore, make downscaling an even more feasible approach that will still be required to tailor information for users.

scholarly journals Benefits from using combined dynamical-statistical downscaling approaches – lessons from a case study in the Mediterranean region

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 705-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Guyennon ◽  
E. Romano ◽  
I. Portoghese ◽  
F. Salerno ◽  
S. Calmanti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Downscaling ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Maximum Temperature ◽  
Max Planck ◽  
Fifth Generation ◽  
Basin Scale

Abstract. Various downscaling techniques have been developed to bridge the scale gap between global climate models (GCMs) and finer scales required to assess hydrological impacts of climate change. Such techniques may be grouped into two downscaling approaches: the deterministic dynamical downscaling (DD) and the statistical downscaling (SD). Although SD has been traditionally seen as an alternative to DD, recent works on statistical downscaling have aimed to combine the benefits of these two approaches. The overall objective of this study is to assess whether a DD processing performed before the SD permits to obtain more suitable climate scenarios for basin scale hydrological applications starting from GCM simulations. The case study presented here focuses on the Apulia region (South East of Italy, surface area about 20 000 km2), characterised by a typical Mediterranean climate; the monthly cumulated precipitation and monthly mean of daily minimum and maximum temperature distribution were examined for the period 1953–2000. The fifth-generation ECHAM model from the Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology was adopted as GCM. The DD was carried out with the Protheus system (ENEA), while the SD was performed through a monthly quantile-quantile correction. The SD resulted efficient in reducing the mean bias in the spatial distribution at both annual and seasonal scales, but it was not able to correct the miss-modelled non-stationary components of the GCM dynamics. The DD provided a partial correction by enhancing the spatial heterogeneity of trends and the long-term time evolution predicted by the GCM. The best results were obtained through the combination of both DD and SD approaches.

scholarly journals Conditioning model output statistics of regional climate model precipitation on circulation patterns

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Wetterhall ◽  
F. Pappenberger ◽  
Y. He ◽  
J. Freer ◽  
H. L. Cloke
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Direct Method ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Model Output ◽  
Small Catchment ◽  
Model Output Statistics

Abstract. Dynamical downscaling of Global Climate Models (GCMs) through regional climate models (RCMs) potentially improves the usability of the output for hydrological impact studies. However, a further downscaling or interpolation of precipitation from RCMs is often needed to match the precipitation characteristics at the local scale. This study analysed three Model Output Statistics (MOS) techniques to adjust RCM precipitation; (1) a simple direct method (DM), (2) quantile-quantile mapping (QM) and (3) a distribution-based scaling (DBS) approach. The modelled precipitation was daily means from 16 RCMs driven by ERA40 reanalysis data over the 1961–2000 provided by the ENSEMBLES (ENSEMBLE-based Predictions of Climate Changes and their Impacts) project over a small catchment located in the Midlands, UK. All methods were conditioned on the entire time series, separate months and using an objective classification of Lamb's weather types. The performance of the MOS techniques were assessed regarding temporal and spatial characteristics of the precipitation fields, as well as modelled runoff using the HBV rainfall-runoff model. The results indicate that the DBS conditioned on classification patterns performed better than the other methods, however an ensemble approach in terms of both climate models and downscaling methods is recommended to account for uncertainties in the MOS methods.

scholarly journals Present Climate Evaluation and Added Value Analysis of Dynamically Downscaled Simulations of CORDEX—East Asia

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 2317-2341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delei Li ◽  
Baoshu Yin ◽  
Jianlong Feng ◽  
Alessandro Dosio ◽  
Beate Geyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Value Analysis ◽  
Considerable Uncertainty

AbstractIn this study, we investigate the skills of the regional climate model Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling in Climate Mode (CCLM) in reproducing historical climatic features and their added value to the driving global climate models (GCMs) of the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment—East Asia (CORDEX-EA) domain. An ensemble of climate simulations, with a resolution of 0.44°, was conducted by downscaling four GCMs: CNRM-CM5, EC-EARTH, HadGEM2, and MPI-ESM-LR. The CCLM outputs were compared with different observations and reanalysis datasets. Results showed strong seasonal variability of CCLM’s ability in reproducing climatological means, variability, and extremes. The bias of the simulated summer temperatures is generally smaller than that of the winter temperatures; in addition, areas where CCLM adds value to the driving GCMs in simulating temperature are larger in the winter than in the summer. CCLM outperforms GCMs in terms of generating climatological precipitation means and daily precipitation distributions for most regions in the winter, but this is not always the case for the summer. It was found that CCLM biases are partly inherited from GCMs and are significantly shaped by structural biases of CCLM. Furthermore, downscaled simulations show added value in capturing features of consecutive wet days for the tropics and of consecutive dry days for areas to the north of 30°N. We found considerable uncertainty from reanalysis and observation datasets in temperatures and precipitation climatological means for some regions that rival bias values of GCMs and CCLM simulations. We recommend carefully selecting reference datasets when evaluating modeled climate means.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document