scholarly journals Uncertainty in Retrieving Raindrop Size Distribution from Polarimetric Radar Measurements

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Huang ◽  
Guifu Zhang ◽  
Kun Zhao ◽  
Su Liu ◽  
Long Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Fundamental Parameter ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Raindrop Size

AbstractDrop size distribution (DSD) is a fundamental parameter in rain microphysics. Retrieving DSDs from polarimetric radar measurements extends the capabilities of rain microphysics research and quantitative precipitation estimation. In this study, issues in rain DSD retrieval were studied with simulated and measured data. It was found that a three-parameter gamma distribution model was not suitable for directly retrieving DSD from polarimetric radar measurements. A statistical constraint, such as the shape–slope relation used in the constrained-gamma (C-G) distribution model, helped to reduce the uncertainties and errors in the retrieval. The inclusion of specific differential phase (KDP) measurements resulted in more accurate DSD retrieval and rain physical parameter estimation if the measurement errors were properly characterized in the error minimization analysis (EMA), which was verified using two real precipitation events. The study demonstrated the potential of using full polarimetric radar measurements to improve rain DSD retrieval.

scholarly journals Observed Response of the Raindrop Size Distribution to Changes in the Melting Layer

Atmosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Gatlin ◽  
Walter Petersen ◽  
Kevin Knupp ◽  
Lawrence Carey
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Basic Assumption ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Melting Layer ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Stratiform Rainfall

Vertical variability in the raindrop size distribution (RSD) can disrupt the basic assumption of a constant rain profile that is customarily parameterized in radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) techniques. This study investigates the utility of melting layer (ML) characteristics to help prescribe the RSD, in particular the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm), of stratiform rainfall. We utilize ground-based polarimetric radar to map the ML and compare it with Dm observations from the ground upwards to the bottom of the ML. The results show definitive proof that a thickening, and to a lesser extent a lowering, of the ML causes an increase in raindrop diameter below the ML that extends to the surface. The connection between rainfall at the ground and the overlying microphysics in the column provide a means for improving radar QPE at far distances from a ground-based radar or close to the ground where satellite-based radar rainfall retrievals can be ill-defined.

scholarly journals STUDY ON SUMMER RAINDROP SIZE DISTRIBUTION AND RETRIEVED POLARIMETRIC RADAR PARAMETER OVER LEIZHOU PENINSULA

2019 ◽  
Vol XLII-3/W9 ◽  
pp. 245-250
Author(s):  
Z. B. Zhou ◽  
J. J. Lv ◽  
S. J. Niu
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Gamma Distribution ◽  
Least Squares Method ◽  
Convective Precipitation ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Leizhou Peninsula ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Subtropical Monsoon Climate

Abstract. Leizhou peninsula is located in the south of Guangdong Province, near South China Sea, and has a tropical and subtropical monsoon climate. Based on observed drop size distribution (DSD) data from July 2007 to August 2007 with PARSIVEL disdrometers deployed at Zhanjiang and Suixi, the characterists of DSDs are studied. Non-linear least squares method is used to fit Gamma distribution. Convective and stratiform averaged DSDs are in good agreement with Gamma distribution, especially in stratiform case. Convective average DSDs have a wider spectrum and higher peak. Microphysical parameter differences between convective and stratiform are discussed, convective precipitation has a higher mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) and generalized intercepts (Nw) in both areas. The constrained relations between Gamma distribution parameter (μ, Λ, N0) is derived. The retrieved polarimetric radar parameter (KDP, ZDR, Zh) have a good self-consistency, which can be used to improve the accuracy of KDP calculation. R-KDP-ZDR is superior to the R-KDP, R-ZDR-Zh in quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE), with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.98.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Assumption through Comparison of Rain Rates of Measured and Radar-Equivalent Gamma DSD

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1618-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Adirosi ◽  
Eugenio Gorgucci ◽  
Luca Baldini ◽  
Ali Tokay
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractTo date, one of the most widely used parametric forms for modeling raindrop size distribution (DSD) is the three-parameter gamma. The aim of this paper is to analyze the error of assuming such parametric form to model the natural DSDs. To achieve this goal, a methodology is set up to compare the rain rate obtained from a disdrometer-measured drop size distribution with the rain rate of a gamma drop size distribution that produces the same triplets of dual-polarization radar measurements, namely reflectivity factor, differential reflectivity, and specific differential phase shift. In such a way, any differences between the values of the two rain rates will provide information about how well the gamma distribution fits the measured precipitation. The difference between rain rates is analyzed in terms of normalized standard error and normalized bias using different radar frequencies, drop shape–size relations, and disdrometer integration time. The study is performed using four datasets of DSDs collected by two-dimensional video disdrometers deployed in Huntsville (Alabama) and in three different prelaunch campaigns of the NASA–Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) ground validation program including the Hydrological Cycle in Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) special observation period (SOP) 1 field campaign in Rome. The results show that differences in rain rates of the disdrometer DSD and the gamma DSD determining the same dual-polarization radar measurements exist and exceed those related to the methodology itself and to the disdrometer sampling error, supporting the finding that there is an error associated with the gamma DSD assumption.

scholarly journals Quantitative Precipitation Estimation of the Epic 2013 Colorado Flood Event: Polarization Radar-Based Variational Scheme

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 1477-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Yu Chang ◽  
Jothiram Vivekanandan ◽  
Kyoko Ikeda ◽  
Pay-Liam Lin
Keyword(s):  
Power Law ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Flood Event ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Observational Error ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Event Based

AbstractThe accuracy of rain-rate estimation using polarimetric radar measurements has been improved as a result of better characterization of radar measurement quality and rain microphysics. In the literature, a variety of power-law relations between polarimetric radar measurements and rain rate are described because of the dynamic or varying nature of rain microphysics. A variational technique that concurrently takes into account radar observational error and dynamically varying rain microphysics is proposed in this study. Rain-rate estimation using the variational algorithm that uses event-based observational error and background rain climatological values is evaluated using observing system simulation experiments (OSSE), and its performance is demonstrated in the case of an epic Colorado flood event. The rain event occurred between 11 and 12 September 2013. The results from OSSE show that the variational algorithm with event-based observational error consistently estimates more accurate rain rate than does the “R(ZHH, ZDR)” power-law algorithm. On the contrary, the usage of ad hoc or improper observational error degrades the performance of the variational method. Furthermore, the variational algorithm is less sensitive to the observational error of differential reflectivity ZDR than is the R(ZHH, ZDR) algorithm. The variational quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) retrieved more accurate rainfall estimation than did the power-law dual-polarization QPE in this particular event, despite the fact that both algorithms used the same dual-polarization radar measurements from the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document