USING A COMPUTER PROFILE TO ASSESS QUALITY OF CARE IN A PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL

1976 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 623-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Cameron
Author(s):  
Erik Mayer ◽  
Andre Chow ◽  
Lord Ara Darzi ◽  
Thanos Athanasiou

BJPsych Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Williams ◽  
Lorna Farquharson ◽  
Ellen Rhodes ◽  
Mary Dang ◽  
Natasha Lindsay ◽  
...  

Background Questions have been raised regarding differences in the standards of care that patients receive when they are admitted to or discharged from in-patient units at weekends. Aims To compare the quality of care received by patients with anxiety and depressive disorders who were admitted to or discharged from psychiatric hospital at weekends with those admitted or discharged during the ‘working week’. Method Retrospective case-note review of 3795 admissions to in-patient psychiatric wards in England. Quality of care received by people with depressive or anxiety disorders was compared using multivariable regression analyses. Results In total, 795 (20.9%) patients were admitted at weekends and 157 (4.8%) were discharged at weekends. There were minimal differences in quality of care between those admitted at weekends and those admitted during the week. Patients discharged at weekends were less likely to be given sufficient notification (48 h) in advance of being discharged (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.39–0.78), to have a crisis plan in place (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.92) or to be given medication to take home (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.30–0.66). They were also less likely to have been assessed using a validated outcome measure (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50–0.97). Conclusions There is no evidence of a ‘weekend effect’ for patients admitted to psychiatric hospital at weekends, but the quality of care offered to those who were discharged at weekends was relatively poor, highlighting the need for improvement in this area.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-55
Author(s):  
Gláucia de Souza Omori Maier ◽  
Eleine Aparecida Penha Martins ◽  
Mara Solange Gomes Dellaroza

Objective: to assess quality indicators related to the pre-hospital time for patients with acute coronary syndrome.Method: collection took place at a tertiary hospital in Paraná between 2012 and 2013, through interviews and a medical record review. 94 patients participated, 52.1% male, 78.7% who were over 50 years old, 46.9% studied until the fourth grade, 60.6% were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction.Results: the outcomes were the time between the onset of symptoms and the decision to seek help with an average of 1022min ± 343.13, door-to-door 805min ± 181.78; and reperfusion, 455min ± 364.8. The choice to seek out care within 60 min occurred in patients who were having a heart attack, and longer than 60 min in those with a history of heart attack or prior catheterization.Conclusion: We concluded that the pre-hospital indicators studied interfered with the quality of care.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. S178
Author(s):  
A. Timmer ◽  
A. Sadlo ◽  
J. Peplies ◽  
J. Altevers ◽  
A. Bergmann ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 1353-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
K E Covinsky ◽  
C K Bates ◽  
R B Davis ◽  
T L Delbanco

2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Unützer ◽  
Greg Simon ◽  
Chester Pabiniak ◽  
Kate Bond ◽  
Wayne Katon

Author(s):  
Michele L Callisaya ◽  
Tara Purvis ◽  
Katherine Lawler ◽  
Amy Brodtmann ◽  
Dominique A Cadilhac ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To determine whether preexisting dementia is associated with poorer quality of care and outcomes after stroke in the acute hospital phase. Method This was a retrospective analysis of pooled data from the Australian Stroke Foundation national audit conducted in 2015 and 2017. Dementia status was obtained from the medical records. Processes of care to assess quality included: stroke unit care, time-dependent therapy, nursing/allied health assessments, and preparation for discharge. Outcomes included in-hospital complications, independence on discharge, and destination. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between dementia status and processes of care. Multilevel random effects logistic regression, with level defined as hospital, was used to examine associations between dementia status and outcomes. Results There were 683/7,070 (9.7%) audited patients with dementia included. Patients with dementia were less likely to be treated in stroke units (58.3% vs 70.6%), receive thrombolysis if an ischemic stroke (5.8% vs 11.1%), have access within 48 hours to physiotherapy (56.4% vs 69.7%) or occupational therapy (46.8% vs 55.6%), see a dietitian if problems with nutrition (64.4% vs 75.9%), or have mood assessed (2.6% vs 12.3%). Patients with dementia were more likely to receive no rehabilitation (adjusted odds ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.25, 2.83) and be discharged to residential care (adjusted odds ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval 1.50, 3.72). Conclusion People with dementia received poorer quality of care and had worse outcomes after stroke. Our findings raise questions regarding equity and the need for better understanding of why the quality of care differs after stroke for people with dementia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document