DIRECTORY OF WOMEN'S DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS—National Institute on Drug Abuse, report series 44, number 1, July 1979, 65 pages, paperbound. Single copies available free from the National Clearinghouse for Drug Abuse Information, Box 1080, Washington, D.C. 20013

1980 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-b-211
Addiction ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 885-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa E. Perlis ◽  
Don C. Des Jarlais ◽  
Samuel R. Friedman ◽  
Kamyar Arasteh ◽  
Charles F. Turner

1982 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Schor

This study examined the sex-role attitude of the drug abuse treatment counselor as a function of the sex of the counselor, the sex of the client, and the treatment approach (drug free versus methadone maintenance). Two versions of a stimulus vignette depicting a typical client, identical except for the sex of the client, were developed. Counselors rated this hypothetical client on an author developed Attitude Toward Addiction Scale. Findings indicated that: 1) male counselors viewed clients of both sexes more negatively than did female counselors; 2) male clients were viewed more negatively than female clients by counselors of both sexes; 3) counselors in drug free treatment programs viewed clients more negatively than did counselors in methadone maintenance programs; and 4) counselors with less education had more negative attitudes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Farabee ◽  
Carl G. Leukefeld ◽  
Lon Hays

The Presidential Commission on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Epidemic (1988) developed a 10-year plan in 1987 that recommended: “Expanded drug abuse treatment programs sufficient to admit all IV drug users who desired services and, until that occurred, short-term detoxification and low-dose methadone for those on waiting lists.” This study presents data collected from a sample of 2,613 out-of-treatment and non-incarcerated injection drug users in 21 U.S. cities to examine their drug-treatment access during the past year. Analyses on injectors who tried but were unable to enter treatment revealed that program-based reasons (e.g., no room, too costly, or stringent admission criteria) are the most commonly given barriers to drug treatment (72%). However, a notable number of injectors (20%) also reported that individual-based reasons are important for not accessing drug treatment. Injectors giving program- and individual-based reasons for not entering treatment are profiled using logistic regression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document