Article Commentary: Management of Left Pancreatic Trauma

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brice Malgras ◽  
Richard Douard ◽  
Nathalie Siauve ◽  
Philippe Wind

Left pancreatic traumas (LPTs) are rare but serious lesions occurring in 1 to 6 per cent of abdominal trauma patients and mainly resulting from blunt traumas. LPT severity is primarily dependent on the associated injuries and secondarily related to main pancreatic duct injury responsible for complications: acute pancreatitis, pseudocysts, pancreatic fistulas, or abscesses. The guidelines for blunt LPT management can be presented as follows. In case of emergency laparotomy, pancreas exploration is mandatory to detect pancreatic duct lesions. In the absence of main pancreatic duct lesions, simple drainage is advocated. In case of distal injury to the main pancreatic duct, a left pancreatectomy is mandatory. In the absence of initial laparotomy, the diagnosis is more and more based on CT and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, which tend to replace endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a first-intent diagnostic modality. In case of distal injury to the main pancreatic duct, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is recommended. In the absence of main pancreatic duct lesions, nonoperative treatment is advocated. When LPTs are discovered at the time of complications, pancreatic fistulas and/or pseudocysts are associated with main pancreatic lesions, which can be treated by pancreatic duct stenting at ERCP and/or internal endoscopic cystogastrostomy. However, in such cases, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy remains the treatment of choice. Pancreatic ductal lesions resulting from LPT have to be diagnosed early to avoid late complications. Distal pancreatectomy remains the treatment of choice in case of severe pancreatic ductal lesions because the role of ERCP stenting and endoscopic techniques needs further evaluation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-45
Author(s):  
E. S. Drozdov ◽  
E. B. Topolnitskiy ◽  
S. S. Klokov ◽  
T. V. Dibina

Background. Despite declining mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) remains a common complication of distal pancreatic resection surgery challenging to clinical prediction.Objectives. Prognostic analysis of the postoperative pancreatic fistula risk factors in patients with previous distal pancreatectomy.Methods. A retrospective controlled assay enrolled 107 patients, including 63 (58.9%) male and 44 (41.1%) female patients. All patients underwent distal pancreatectomy followed by a morphological examination of resected material. All patients had a general and biochemical blood panel profiling. Pancreatic tissue density at a putative resection zone was assessed with computed tomography. The patients were allocated to two cohorts: (1) not developing PPF (77 patients) and (2) having postoperative PPF complications (30 patients.Results. No statistically significant differences by age, gender, ASA and BMI scores were observed in study cohorts. Multivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation of the PPF rate with the following factors: main pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.05, p = 0.01), pancreatic density at putative resection zone <30 HU in CT (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.38–7.74, p < 0.01) and differential albumin of postoperative day 1 vs. pre-surgery >14 g/L (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.19–8.24, p < 0.01).Conclusion. A main pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, pancreatic density at putative resection zone <30 HU in CT and differential albumin of postoperative day 1 vs. pre-surgery >14 g/L are independent risk factors of postoperative fistulae.


2013 ◽  
Vol 216 (3) ◽  
pp. e23-e25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Soejima ◽  
Ken Shirabe ◽  
Tomoharu Yoshizumi ◽  
Toru Ikegami ◽  
Yoichi Yamashita ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. S116
Author(s):  
Dezső Kelemen ◽  
Róbert Papp ◽  
Zsanett Bíró ◽  
Levente Kucserik ◽  
András Vereczkei

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
Badri Valerievich SiguA ◽  
Vyacheslav Petrovich Zemlyanoy ◽  
Evgeny Alekseevich Zakharov ◽  
Malkhaz Yurievich Tsikoridze ◽  
Anatoliy Nikolaevich Napalkov

Backgraund. Pancreatoduodenal resection (PDR) is the only radical treatment for malignant tumors of the periampullary zone. The development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common complication of PDR. The main risk factors for the development of POPF are the narrow main pancreatic duct and the soft, "juicy" pancreatic parenchyma. Thus, it is the stage of formation of a pancretodigestive anastomosis that is of decisive importance for the course of the postoperative period.The aim of the study was to improve immediate surgical treatment outcomes of patients suffering from oncological diseases of the periampullary zone with a soft pancreas and a narrow pancreatic duct.Methods. A novel method to form terminolateral reservoir invagination pancreatojejunostomy has been developed and introduced into clinical practice. The results of treatment of 94 patients with tumors of the periampullary zone were analyzed. Based on preoperative radiological diagnosis and intraoperative findings, such factors of a high risk of POPF development as a soft pancreas and a narrow major pancreatic duct ( 3 mm) were detected in 23 patients (24.4%). In 11 patients who were treated in 2018-2019, a novel method of pancreato-jejunoanastomosis formation was applied. The comparison group consisted of 12 patients who received treatment in 2014-2017; a differentiated approach to the formation of a pancreatodigestive anastomosis was not applied.Results. In patients of the main group, there was a tendency to an increase in the proportion of pylorus-saving PDRs. The only statistically significant difference was the use of reservoir terminolateral pancreatojejunostomy at the reconstructive stage of surgery. Complicated postoperative course was observed in 7 (63.6%) patients of the main group and in all patients of the comparison group (p 0.05). There was also a decrease in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistulas from 66.6 to 18.2% (p 0.05) in the study group. Repeated surgery was required in 3 (27.2%) patients of the main group and 7 (58.3%) patients in the comparison group (p 0.05). The lethal outcome was recorded in 2 (18.2%) patients of the main group and in 3 (25%) in the comparison group (p 0.05).Conclusion. A soft, loose pancreas and a narrow main pancreatic duct are the most significant risk factors for complications in the postoperative period. Management of this condition requires a differentiated approach to the treatment option of pancreatodigestive anastomosis formation, depending on the characteristics of the pancreas of an individual patient. The proposed technique for the reservoir terminolateral pancreatojejunoanastomosis formation allowed statistically significantly reducing the incidence of complications from 100 to 63.6% and the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistulas from 66.6 to 18.2% in high-risk patients..


Author(s):  
V. V. Darvin ◽  
S. V. Onishchenko ◽  
E. V. Loginov ◽  
A. A. Kabanov

Aim. To analyze management of severe acute destructive pancreatitis and to determine the main tactical, anatomical and pathophysiological factors determining risks of adverse outcomes. Material and methods. 3581 patients with acute pancreatitis were enrolled. Retrospectively, 239 patients were assigned to severe pancreatic necrosis; invasive surgical techniques were applied in 210 cases. Twenty-nine patients with pancreatic necrosis underwent endoscopic papillosphincterotomy with main pancreatic duct stenting. Results. Overall mortality in patients with severe pancreatic necrosis was 32.3%, in case of minimally invasive techniques – 29.6%, conventional approach – 34.1%. There were similar outcomes regardless surgical technique in patients with pancreatic necrosis (p > 0.05), although introduction of main statements of national recommendations for treatment of pancreatic necrosis (regardless severity) reduced mortality from 25.4% to 9.5% (p < 0.001). Advanced parapancreatitis was accompanied by mortality near 36.5%. Stenting of main pancreatic duct was followed by death of 3 out of 29 patients with pancreatic necrosis (10.3%). Conclusion. Indications and choice of surgical approach according to national recommendations are not accompanied by improved postoperative mortality in patients with severe pancreatic necrosis and multiple organ failure. However, according to analysis on the whole, there is reduced postoperative mortality regardless severity of disease if these recommendations are sustained. Widespread involvement of retroperitoneal structures is adverse prognostic factor. Early endoscopic intraduodenal drainage in effective to prevent parapancreatic tissues.


2018 ◽  
Vol 177 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
S. E. Voskanyan ◽  
E. V. Naydenov ◽  
I. Yu. Uteshev ◽  
A. I. Artemiev ◽  
Yu. D. Udalov ◽  
...  

The  OBJECTIVE  is  to  study  the  effect  of application of different  pancreatic stump  closure techniques to  the  postoperative period,  the frequency and  severity  of postoperative complications including postoperative pancreatic fistulas  after distal pancreatectomies. MATERIAL AND METHODS.  The  clinical  material  consisted of 126  patients who  underwent distal  pancreatectomies  (isolated or  in  combination  with  surgical   interventions  on  the  adjacent organs of  the  abdominal cavity  and retroperitoneal space).  The  patients  were   divided  into  4  groups  depending  on  the  pancreatic  stump   closure  techniques (isolated suturing  of the  main  pancreatic duct  of the  pancreatic stump  with its omentization by gastrocolic omentum or local sealing its  by  hemostatic sponge  (control  group);  using  a  local  biological  glue  2-octylcyanoacrylate; using  the  Endoscopic Linear  Cutter  Echelon; external transduodenal  transnasal  drainage of the  enlarged main  pancreatic duct  of the  pancreatic stump). We  evaluated the  influence   of  different  pancreatic stump   closure techniques  after  distal  pancreatectomies on  the postoperative period  as well the  frequency and  severity  of postoperative pancreatic fistulas  depending on the  diameter of the main  pancreatic duct  of pancreatic stump.   RESULTS.  The  overall  rate  of postoperative  complications in the  control  group of patients was  45.8  %, and  was  due  to an  increase in the  frequency of specific  complications (35.4  %). The  most  frequent complication  in  the  control  group   of  patients  was   postoperative  pancreatic  fistulas   –  29.2   %.  The  statistically   significant decrease  of  frequency  and   severity   of  postoperative  complications,  frequency  and   severity   of  postoperative  pancreatic fistulas and decrease of postoperative hospital-stay after the application of the proposed different pancreatic stump closure techniques were  revealed in comparison with the  control  group  of patients. There  was  no  hospital  mortality.  CONCLUSION. Distal  pancreatectomy with  «standard»  pancreatic stump   closure techniques  accompanied by  high  frequency and  severity of postoperative complications, as well as postoperative pancreatic fistulas. The use of the proposed pancreatic stump closure techniques after  distal  pancreatectomy led  to  a  decrease of  the  frequency and  severity   of  postoperative  complications, a decrease of the  frequency and  severity  of postoperative pancreatic fistulas,  and  a decrease of the  postoperative hospital-stay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document