A Single Surgeons Experience with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: An Army of One

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 594-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalina Mosquera ◽  
Nicholas J. Koutlas ◽  
Timothy L. Fitzgerald
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Intestinal Resection ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Individual Surgeon ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
Surgical Oncologist

The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) have been demonstrated for multiple surgical procedures in high-volume programs. However, resources required for its implementation may be daunting to individual surgeons. Patients undergoing elective abdominal procedures from June 2013 to April 2015 by a surgical oncologist before and after the implementation of an ERAS protocol were reviewed. A total of 179 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 63 years, and a majority of them were females (53.6%), white (61.5%), had a Charlson score of 0 to 2 (45.8%), and a Clavien complication grade of 0 to I (60.1%). The univariate analysis revealed that the ERAS protocol was associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) (6.2 vs 9.6 days), lower cost ($21,674 vs $30,380), and lower mortality (0 vs 3.3%); P < 0.05. Differences were noted in LOS and costs for all procedures, the differences were the greatest for hepatic resection (3.8 vs 8.4 days and $16,770 vs $28,589), intestinal resection/stoma closure (4.8 vs 7.6 days and $18,391 vs $22,239), and other abdominal procedures (5.0 vs 10.8 and $17,713 vs $30,900); P < 0.05. The differences were less for patients undergoing procedures for which postoperative pathways were already in place such as pancreatic (9 vs 10.8 days and $30,524 vs $34,291) and colorectal (5.3 vs 6.5 days and $20,733 vs $25,150) surgeries. P > 0.05. An ERAS program can be instituted by an individual surgeon with the benefits of decreased LOS, cost, and mortality.

Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Implementation on Cost and Outcomes by Type of Colectomy Performed

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (9) ◽  
pp. 1078-1082
Author(s):  
Miles Landry ◽  
Rachel Lewis ◽  
Andrew Antill ◽  
R. Eric Heidel ◽  
Jessica Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Longitudinal Impact ◽  
Anatomic Site ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are widely utilized for elective colorectal surgery to improve outcomes and decrease costs, but few studies have evaluated the impact of ERAS protocols on cost with respect to anatomic site of resection. This study evaluated the impact of ERAS protocol on elective colon resections by site and longitudinal impact over time. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study of 598 consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resection before and after implementation of ERAS protocol from 2013 to 2017 was performed. The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and cost. Comparative and multivariate inferential statistics were used to assess additional outcomes. Results A total of 598 patients (100 pre-ERAS vs 498 post-ERAS) were evaluated with an overall median LOS of 4 days for right and left colectomies and 3 days for transverse colectomies. When comparing type of resection before and after ERAS protocol introduction, an increased LOS for left hemicolectomies from 3.09 to 4.03 days ( P = .047) was noted, with all other comparisons failing to reach statistical significance. Over time, an initial decrease in LOS for MIS approach after protocol introduction was observed; however, this effect diminished in the ensuing years and had no significant effect overall. Total cost of care was significantly increased post-ERAS for all cohorts except transverse colectomies. No further statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion After an initial improvement in outcomes, continued utilization of ERAS protocols demonstrated no improvement in LOS compared to pre-ERAS data and increased cost overall for patients regardless of site of resection.

scholarly journals Defining postoperative ileus and associated risk factors in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Connor M. Forbes ◽  
Ali Cyrus Chehroudi ◽  
Miles Mannas ◽  
Andrea Bisaillon ◽  
Tracey Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Ileus ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Eras Protocol

Introduction: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication of radical cystectomy (RC), occurring in 1.6–23.5% of cases. It is defined heterogeneously in the literature. POI increases hospital length of stay and postoperative morbidity. Factors such as age, epidural use, length of procedure, and blood loss may impact POI. In this study, we aimed to evaluate risk factors that contribute to POI in a cohort of patients managed with a comprehensive Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RC from March 2015 to December 2016 at Vancouver General Hospital was performed. POI was defined a priori as insertion of nasogastric tube for nausea or vomiting, or failure to advance to a solid diet by the seventh postoperative day. To illustrate heterogeneity in previous studies, we also evaluated POI using other previously reported definitions in the RC literature. The influence of potential risk factors for POI, including patient comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, gender, age, prior abdominal surgery or radiation, length of operation, diversion type, extent of lymph node dissection, removal date of analgesic catheter, blood loss, and fluid administration volume was analyzed. Results: Thirty-six (27%) of 136 patients developed POI. Using other previously reported definitions for POI, the incidence ranged from <1–51%. Node positive status and age at surgery were associated with POI on univariate analysis but not multivariable analysis. Conclusions: A large range of POI incidence was observed using previously published definitions of POI. We advocate for a standardized definition of POI when evaluating RC outcomes. POI occurs frequently even with a comprehensive ERAS protocol, suggesting that additional measures are needed to reduce the rate of POI.

scholarly journals Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in a Single High-Volume Surgical Oncology Unit: Details Matter

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Timothy L. Fitzgerald ◽  
Catalina Mosquera ◽  
Nicholas J. Koutlas ◽  
Nasreen A. Vohra ◽  
Kimberly V. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Surgical Oncology ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Oncology Unit ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Surgical Unit

Benefits of ERAS protocol have been well documented; however, it is unclear whether the improvement stems from the protocol or shifts in expectations. Interdisciplinary educational seminars were conducted for all health professionals. However, one test surgeon adopted the protocol. 394 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery from June 2013 to April 2015 with a median age of 63 years were included. The implementation of ERAS protocol resulted in a decrease in the length of stay (LOS) and mortality, whereas the difference in cost was found to be insignificant. For the test surgeon, ERAS was associated with decreased LOS, cost, and mortality. For the control providers, the LOS, cost, mortality, readmission rates, and complications remained similar both before and after the implementation of ERAS. An ERAS protocol on the single high-volume surgical unit decreased the cost, LOS, and mortality.

scholarly journals Comparison of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and conventional approach after laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a retrospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Semih Guleser ◽  
Yasar Basaga ◽  
Mert Ali Karadag
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enteral Feeding ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Although open radical prostatectomy has been used in the treatment of localized prostate cancer for a long time, minimally invasive surgical approaches such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have recently gained importance in order to improve postoperative results and shorten hospital stay. Although the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was first defined for gastrointestinal surgeries in 2001, it has now been used in gynecological, orthopedic, thoracic and urological surgeries. In our study, we aimed to compare the results of the ERAS protocol with the conventional approach in patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Methods There is a retrospective analysis of 70 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Kayseri City Hospital between May 2018 and January 2021. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Seventy patients were included in the study. While 48 patients who underwent perioperative care with the traditional approach were included in the conventional group, 22 patients were included in the ERAS group. Age, comorbidities, preoperative PSA level, digital rectal examination findings, preoperative imaging, extra prostatic spread and lymph node involvement, location of tumors, time between biopsy and surgery, lymphadenectomy status, and histopathological findings of transrectal ultrasound biopsy and prostatectomy specimens were recorded for each patient. Initiation of enteral feeding, time to first defecation, duration of antibiotic use, ileus development rate and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared for both groups. Results The mean age of 48 patients in the conventional group was 63.37 ± 7.01 years, while the mean age of 22 patients in the ERAS group was 66.36 ± 5.31 years (p = 0.080). Although the first defecation time was shorter in the ERAS group (4.75 ± 3.21 vs. 3.73 ± 2.12 days, p = 0.179), there was no statistically significant difference. Ileus developed in 10 (20.8%) patients in the conventional group and 2 (9.1%) in the ERAS group. Use of antibiotics in the postoperative period in the conventional group (5.83 ± 3.62 vs. 3.18 ± 2.42 days, p = 0.003) and LOS (7.92 ± 3.26 vs. 5.91 ± 2, 15 days, p = 0.011) were statistically significantly longer. Conclusion In summary, ERAS protocol is associated with short LOS, time to initiation of enteral feeding and duration of antibiotics use. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of ileus and time to first defecation between the two groups. Randomized prospective studies on heterogeneous and larger patient groups are needed to confirm our findings.

Investigation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol outcome on post colectomy patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 175045892092536
Author(s):  
Sharon D Baoas ◽  
Toni Beninato ◽  
Michael Zenilman ◽  
Gokhan Ozuner
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
Colorectal Procedures

Background An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was implemented to improve quality and cost effectiveness of surgical care in elective colorectal procedures. Methods A retrospective study was conducted from July 2017 to June 2018. The ERAS protocol was initiated on 9 July 2018 and retrospectively reviewed in July 2019 by chart review, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database and risk stratification using Clavien–Dindo classification for all elective colorectal procedures. Results A total of 109 patients, 55 (pre-ERAS) and 54 (post-ERAS) are included in the final analysis. There were no differences in complications were recorded ( p = 0.37) and 30-day readmissions ( p = 0.785). The mean hospital stay was 5.89 ± 2.62 days in pre-ERAS and 4.94 ± 2.27 days in post-ERAS group which was statistically significant ( p = 0.047). Conclusions An ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery harmonised perioperative care and decreased length of stay.

The financial impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in an academic gynecologic oncology practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary L. Gentry ◽  
Teresa K.L. Boitano ◽  
Haller J. Smith ◽  
Dustin K. Eads ◽  
John F. Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Financial Impact ◽  
Oncology Practice ◽  
Eras Protocol

scholarly journals The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1843-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Rogers ◽  
David Bleetman ◽  
David E. Messenger ◽  
Natasha A. Joshi ◽  
Lesley Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Protocol Compliance ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Biological impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme in liver surgery

BJS Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gonvers ◽  
J Jurt ◽  
G -R Joliat ◽  
N Halkic ◽  
E Melloul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Surgical Stress ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Albumin Concentration ◽  
Biological Impact ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Major Resection

Abstract Background The clinical and economic impacts of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have been demonstrated extensively. Whether ERAS protocols also have a biological effect remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the biological impact of an ERAS programme in patients undergoing liver surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing liver surgery (2010–2018) was undertaken. Patients operated before and after ERAS implementation in 2013 were compared. Surrogate markers of surgical stress were monitored: white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, albumin concentration, and haematocrit. Their perioperative fluctuations were defined as Δvalues, calculated on postoperative day (POD) 0 for Δalbumin and Δhaematocrit and POD 2 for ΔWBC and ΔCRP. Results A total of 541 patients were included, with 223 and 318 patients in non-ERAS and ERAS groups respectively. Groups were comparable, except for higher rates of laparoscopy (24.8 versus 11.2 per cent; P &lt; 0.001) and major resection (47.5 versus 38.1 per cent; P = 0.035) in the ERAS group. Patients in the ERAS group showed attenuated ΔWBC (2.00 versus 2.75 g/l; P = 0.013), ΔCRP (60 versus 101 mg/l; P &lt;0.001) and Δalbumin (12 versus 16 g/l; P &lt; 0.001) compared with those in the no-ERAS group. Subgroup analysis of open resection showed similar results. Multivariable analysis identified ERAS as the only independent factor associated with high ΔWBC (odds ratio (OR) 0.65, 95 per cent c.i. 0.43 to 0.98; P = 0.038), ΔCRP (OR 0.41, 0.23 to 0.73; P = 0.003) and Δalbumin (OR 0.40, 95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.72; P = 0.002). Conclusion Compared with conventional management, implementation of ERAS was associated with an attenuated stress response in patients undergoing liver surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document