scholarly journals Comparison of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and conventional approach after laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a retrospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Semih Guleser ◽  
Yasar Basaga ◽  
Mert Ali Karadag
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enteral Feeding ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Although open radical prostatectomy has been used in the treatment of localized prostate cancer for a long time, minimally invasive surgical approaches such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have recently gained importance in order to improve postoperative results and shorten hospital stay. Although the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was first defined for gastrointestinal surgeries in 2001, it has now been used in gynecological, orthopedic, thoracic and urological surgeries. In our study, we aimed to compare the results of the ERAS protocol with the conventional approach in patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Methods There is a retrospective analysis of 70 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Kayseri City Hospital between May 2018 and January 2021. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Seventy patients were included in the study. While 48 patients who underwent perioperative care with the traditional approach were included in the conventional group, 22 patients were included in the ERAS group. Age, comorbidities, preoperative PSA level, digital rectal examination findings, preoperative imaging, extra prostatic spread and lymph node involvement, location of tumors, time between biopsy and surgery, lymphadenectomy status, and histopathological findings of transrectal ultrasound biopsy and prostatectomy specimens were recorded for each patient. Initiation of enteral feeding, time to first defecation, duration of antibiotic use, ileus development rate and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared for both groups. Results The mean age of 48 patients in the conventional group was 63.37 ± 7.01 years, while the mean age of 22 patients in the ERAS group was 66.36 ± 5.31 years (p = 0.080). Although the first defecation time was shorter in the ERAS group (4.75 ± 3.21 vs. 3.73 ± 2.12 days, p = 0.179), there was no statistically significant difference. Ileus developed in 10 (20.8%) patients in the conventional group and 2 (9.1%) in the ERAS group. Use of antibiotics in the postoperative period in the conventional group (5.83 ± 3.62 vs. 3.18 ± 2.42 days, p = 0.003) and LOS (7.92 ± 3.26 vs. 5.91 ± 2, 15 days, p = 0.011) were statistically significantly longer. Conclusion In summary, ERAS protocol is associated with short LOS, time to initiation of enteral feeding and duration of antibiotics use. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of ileus and time to first defecation between the two groups. Randomized prospective studies on heterogeneous and larger patient groups are needed to confirm our findings.

scholarly journals Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhua Lin ◽  
Fengchun Wan ◽  
Youyi Lu ◽  
Guojun Li ◽  
Luxin Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
The Body ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Hospitalization Costs

Objective To determine the value of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using clinical data for 288 patients who underwent LRP in our hospital from June 2010 to December 2016. A total of 124 patients underwent ERAS (ERAS group) and the remaining 164 patients were allocated to the control group. ERAS comprised prehabilitation exercise, carbohydrate fluid loading, targeted intraoperative fluid resuscitation and keeping the body warm, avoiding drain use, early mobilization, and early postoperative drinking and eating. Results The times from LRP to first water intake, first ambulation, first anal exhaust, first defecation, pelvic drainage-tube removal, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were all significantly shorter, and hospitalization costs and the incidence of postoperative complications were significantly lower in the ERAS group compared with the control group. No deaths or reoperations occurred in either group, and there were no readmissions in the ERAS group, within 90 days after surgery. Conclusion ERAS protocols may effectively accelerate patient rehabilitation and reduce LOS and hospitalization costs in patients undergoing LRP.

scholarly journals Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway optimizes outcomes and costs for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052092007
Author(s):  
Ying Xu ◽  
Ao Liu ◽  
Lu Chen ◽  
Hai Huang ◽  
Yi Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Conventional Care ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
The Impact

Objective To evaluate the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on patients undergoing minimally invasive radical prostatectomy at a single institute. Methods In this retrospective study, 301 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from May 2014 to September 2018 were consecutively recruited. Before April 2017, the patients were treated with conventional care; all patients were treated with the ERAS pathway thereafter. The primary outcome was the postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS). The secondary outcomes were hospitalization costs and postoperative complications. Results In total, 138 patients were treated with the ERAS pathway, and the remaining patients underwent conventional care. The postoperative LOS was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the conventional group (median, 6 vs. 8 days). The hospitalization costs were also significantly lower in the ERAS group ($4086 vs. $5530). Ten (6.1%) patients in the ERAS group and 17 (12.3%) patients in the conventional group developed postoperative complications. The multivariable analysis showed that ERAS care was a significant independent predictive factor for a shortened LOS and reduced hospitalization costs. Conclusions The ERAS pathway was associated with a shortened LOS and reduced hospitalization costs for patients undergoing minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

The contribution of specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol elements to reduced length of hospital stay after ventral hernia repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 4638-4644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walker Ueland ◽  
Seth Walsh-Blackmore ◽  
Michael Nisiewicz ◽  
Daniel L. Davenport ◽  
Margaret A. Plymale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Eras Protocol

scholarly journals Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. E18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hwa Heo ◽  
Choon Keun Park
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVEThe aims of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) are to improve surgical outcomes, shorten hospital stays, and reduce complications. The objective of this study was to introduce ERAS with biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to investigate the clinical results.METHODSPatients were divided into two groups based on the fusion procedures. Patients who received microscopic TLIF without ERAS were classified as the non-ERAS group, whereas those who received percutaneous biportal endoscopic TLIF with ERAS were classified as the ERAS group. The mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared between the two groups. In addition, demographic characteristics, diagnosis, mean operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), fusion rate, readmissions, and complications were investigated and compared.RESULTSForty-six patients were grouped into the non-ERAS group (microscopic TLIF without ERAS) and 23 patients into the ERAS group (biportal endoscopic TLIF with ERAS). The VAS score for preoperative back pain on days 1 and 2 was significantly higher in the non-ERAS group than in the ERAS group (p < 0.05). The mean operative duration was significantly higher in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group, while the mean EBL was significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in fusion rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). Readmission was required in 2 patients who were from the non-ERAS group. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 cases in the non-ERAS group and in 2 cases in the ERAS group.CONCLUSIONSPercutaneous biportal endoscopic TLIF with an ERAS pathway may have good aspects in reducing bleeding and postoperative pain. Endoscopic fusion surgery along with the ERAS concept may help to accelerate recovery after surgery.

A Single Surgeons Experience with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: An Army of One

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 594-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalina Mosquera ◽  
Nicholas J. Koutlas ◽  
Timothy L. Fitzgerald
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Intestinal Resection ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Individual Surgeon ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
Surgical Oncologist

The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) have been demonstrated for multiple surgical procedures in high-volume programs. However, resources required for its implementation may be daunting to individual surgeons. Patients undergoing elective abdominal procedures from June 2013 to April 2015 by a surgical oncologist before and after the implementation of an ERAS protocol were reviewed. A total of 179 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 63 years, and a majority of them were females (53.6%), white (61.5%), had a Charlson score of 0 to 2 (45.8%), and a Clavien complication grade of 0 to I (60.1%). The univariate analysis revealed that the ERAS protocol was associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) (6.2 vs 9.6 days), lower cost ($21,674 vs $30,380), and lower mortality (0 vs 3.3%); P < 0.05. Differences were noted in LOS and costs for all procedures, the differences were the greatest for hepatic resection (3.8 vs 8.4 days and $16,770 vs $28,589), intestinal resection/stoma closure (4.8 vs 7.6 days and $18,391 vs $22,239), and other abdominal procedures (5.0 vs 10.8 and $17,713 vs $30,900); P < 0.05. The differences were less for patients undergoing procedures for which postoperative pathways were already in place such as pancreatic (9 vs 10.8 days and $30,524 vs $34,291) and colorectal (5.3 vs 6.5 days and $20,733 vs $25,150) surgeries. P > 0.05. An ERAS program can be instituted by an individual surgeon with the benefits of decreased LOS, cost, and mortality.

Introduction of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiko Sugi ◽  
Tadashi Matsuda ◽  
Takashi Yoshida ◽  
Hisanori Taniguchi ◽  
Takao Mishima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Robot Assisted

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Radical Cystectomy Decreases Postoperative Complications at Different Times

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
François Lannes ◽  
Jochen Walz ◽  
Thomas Maubon ◽  
Stanislas Rybikowski ◽  
Sami Fakhfakh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Fast Recovery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
Over Time

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> This study aimed to assess whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves, at different time points, postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective monocentric study using prospectively maintained databases including all patients treated by radical cystectomy between January 2015 and July 2019. An ERAS protocol was applied in all patients from February 2018. We analyzed and compared between non-ERAS and ERAS groups early and 90-day postoperative complications and 90-day readmission. ERAS was analyzed to know its implication in fast recovery improvement over time. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 150 patients underwent radical cystectomy, 74 without ERAS and 76 with ERAS protocol. ERAS decreased significantly early (<i>p</i> = 0.039) and 90-day (0.012) postoperative complications. In multivariate analysis, ERAS was an independent factor associated with less early (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25–0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.37) and 90-day (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14–0.68; <i>p</i> = 0.004) postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between groups for 90-day readmission (<i>p</i> = 0.349). Mean length of stay did not differ significantly between ERAS and non-ERAS groups (12.7 ± 6.2 and 13.1 ± 5.7 days, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.743). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Our study shows that ERAS has an early positive impact that lasts over time on postoperative complications. ERAS implementation has decreased early and 90-day postoperative complications without increasing 90-day readmission. In our cohort, length of stay was not improved with ERAS protocol.

scholarly journals Improving recovery after elective degenerative spine surgery: 5-year experience with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. E7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor E. Staartjes ◽  
Marlies P. de Wispelaere ◽  
Marc L. Schröder
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Degenerative Spine ◽  
Concomitant Decrease ◽  
Eras Protocol

OBJECTIVEEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has led to a paradigm shift in various surgical specialties. Its application can result in substantial benefits in perioperative healthcare utilization through preoperative physical and mental patient optimization and modulation of the recovery process. Still, ERAS remains relatively new to spine surgery. The authors report their 5-year experience, focusing on ERAS application to a broad population of patients with degenerative spine conditions undergoing elective surgical procedures, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).METHODSA multimodal ERAS protocol was applied between November 2013 and October 2018. The authors analyze hospital stay, perioperative outcomes, readmissions, and adverse events obtained from a prospective institutional registry. Elective tubular microdiscectomy and mini-open decompression as well as minimally invasive (MI) anterior or posterior fusion cases were included. Their institutional ERAS protocol contains 22 pre-, intra-, and postoperative elements, including preoperative patient counseling, MI techniques, early mobilization and oral intake, minimal postoperative restrictions, and regular audits.RESULTSA total of 2592 consecutive patients were included, with 199 (8%) undergoing fusion. The mean hospital stay was 1.1 ± 1.2 days, with 20 (0.8%) 30-day and 36 (1.4%) 60-day readmissions. Ninety-four percent of patients were discharged after a maximum 1-night hospital stay. Over the 5-year period, a clear trend toward a higher proportion of patients discharged home after a 1-night stay was observed (p < 0.001), with a concomitant decrease in adverse events in the overall cohort (p = 0.025) and without increase in readmissions. For fusion procedures, the rate of 1-night hospital stays increased from 26% to 85% (p < 0.001). Similarly, the average length of hospital stay decreased steadily from 2.4 ± 1.2 days to 1.5 ± 0.3 days (p < 0.001), with a notable concomitant decrease in variance, resulting in an estimated reduction in nursing costs of 46.8%.CONCLUSIONSApplication of an ERAS protocol over 5 years to a diverse population of patients undergoing surgical procedures, including ALIF, for treatment of degenerative spine conditions was safe and effective, without increase in readmissions. The data from this large case series stress the importance of the multidisciplinary, iterative improvement process to overcome the learning curve associated with ERAS implementation, and the importance of a dedicated perioperative care team. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate spinal ERAS on a higher level of evidence.

scholarly journals The successful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program among caesarean deliveries in Bhutan to reduce the postoperative length of hospital stay

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tshering Tamang ◽  
Tashi Wangchuk ◽  
Choning Zangmo ◽  
Tshering Wangmo ◽  
Karma Tshomo
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Hospital Data ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary perioperative care program to optimize and enhance postoperative recovery. It has a beneficial role in decreasing the length of hospital stay and improving the quality of care. This study aims to observe the successful implementation of ERAS in reducing the length of hospital stay (LOS) among caesarean deliveries. Methods A pre-and post-implementation study of ERAS protocol was conducted, among cohort of women who underwent caesarean deliveries from January to December 2020 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mongar Regional Referral hospital. Data collected retrospectively and analyzed in SPSS (IBM SPSS trial version); and comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups were tested by t-test. Results One hundred seventy-one patients were included in the study: 87 in the pre-ERAS and 84 in the post-ERAS cohort. Post implementation, LOS decreased by an average of 21.0 (CI 16.11–24.64; p-value < 0.001) hours in the postoperative period. A greater proportion of patients were discharged on day-2 (2.3% in pre-ERAS and 81% in ERAS; p-value < 0.001). Conclusion Implementation of ERAS protocol can significantly decrease the postoperative length of hospital stay without increasing the complications and readmission rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document