Laparoscopic Resection of Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110604
Author(s):  
Jan A. Niec ◽  
Muhammad O.A. Ghani ◽  
Melissa A. Hilmes ◽  
Katlyn G. McKay ◽  
Hernan Correa ◽  
...  

Background Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) of the pancreas arise rarely in children, are often large, and can associate intimately with splenic vessels. Splenic preservation is a fundamental consideration when resecting distal SPT. Occasionally, the main splenic vessels must be divided to resect the SPT with negative margins, but the spleen can be preserved if the short gastric vessels remain intact (ie, Warshaw procedure). The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of distal pancreatectomy (DP) for SPT in children and to highlight 2 cases of splenic preservation using the Warshaw procedure. Methods Patients 19 years and younger who were treated at a single children’s hospital between July 2004 and January 2021 were examined. Patient characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record. A pediatric radiologist calculated SPT and pre- and post-operative (ie, non-infarcted) splenic volumes. Results Eleven patients received DP for SPT. Six DPs were performed open and 5 laparoscopically. The spleen was preserved in 3 open and 4 laparoscopic DPs. A laparoscopic Warshaw procedure was performed in 2 patients. Laparoscopic resection associated with less frequent epidural use ( P = .015), shorter time to full diet ( P = .030), and post-operative length of stay ( P = .009), compared to open resection. Average residual splenic volume after the laparoscopic Warshaw procedure was 70% of preoperative volume. Discussion Laparoscopic DP for pediatric SPT achieved similar oncologic goals to open resection. Splenic preservation was feasible with laparoscopy in most cases and was successfully supplemented with the Warshaw procedure, which has not been previously reported for SPT resection in children.

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (8) ◽  
pp. 274-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Coleman

In 2006 the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence issued guidance that laparoscopic resection is recommended as an alternative to open resection for individuals with colorectal cancer in whom both laparoscopic and open surgery are considered suitable. Due to the lack of trained colorectal surgeons a waiver was issued, which is due to be reviewed in September 2009. In 2007 the Cancer Action Team (CAT) at the Department of Health (DH) instituted the national training programme (NTP) for laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) for colorectal consultants in England. The intention is to provide all suitable patients with bowel cancer in need of resection, access to a trained surgeon for laparoscopic resection. The programme is funded by the CAT.


2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095148
Author(s):  
Miao Yu ◽  
Deng-chao Wang ◽  
Jian Wei ◽  
Yue-hua Lei ◽  
Zhao-jun Fu ◽  
...  

Background The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) larger than 5 cm. Method We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase for relevant articles. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials were identified and included in this study. Searching for related articles on large GIST (>5 cm) for laparoscopic resection (laparoscopic group [LAPG]) and open resection (open group [OG]), RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis, comparing 2 groups of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Results Seven studies including 440 patients were identified for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that LAPG had less bleeding, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and a better 5-year disease-free survival. There was no significant difference between LAPG and OG in operation time, postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and overall survival. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection of large (>5 cm) GIST is safe and feasible and has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss and fast postoperative recovery, with a good outcome in the recent oncology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-504
Author(s):  
Yawara Kubota ◽  
Takashi Okuyama ◽  
Haruka Oi ◽  
Emiko Takeshita ◽  
Takashi Mitsui ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 768-768
Author(s):  
Selene A. Miller ◽  
Laura Sevick ◽  
Sergio Acuna ◽  
Marck Mercado ◽  
Nancy N. Baxter ◽  
...  

768 Background: This single institution retrospective study evaluates the reason for delay in Time To Adjuvant Chemotherapy (TTAC) from curative resection surgery to start of adjuvant therapy in CRC. The reason for this study was to determine if type of surgery (laparoscopic versus open) increased TTAC of which evidence indicates poorer disease free survival and overall survival (Biagi J, Raphael M, Mackillop W, Kong W, King W, Booth C. Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 305(22):2335-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.749.) Methods: CRC patients treated at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Canada were included if diagnosed with stage II or III disease, underwent curative resection surgery between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2012, and either received systemic adjuvant chemotherapy or surveillance protocol. Results: Among 259 patients, 92 patients (35.7%) underwent curative laparoscopic resection and 166 open resection (64.3%). Intraoperative and/or postoperative complications were experienced in 73 patients. Complications were less prevalent among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery versus open resection (11.9% vs. 36.8%; p<0.0001). Of these 73 complications, wound infection (39.7%), intraoperative procedural complication (14.3%), and postoperative gastrointestinal complications (6.4%) were most prevalent. After adjusting for complication and clustering within the operating surgeon, there were no statistical differences in TTAC between open (51.310 ± 1.7 days) and laparoscopic (49.2 ± 1.6 days) resection surgeries (p=0.1996). However, presence of a complication was associated with delay in TTAC (HR 0.501; 95% CI, 0.43-0.58; p<0.001). Conclusions: TTAC in CRC patients does not differ statically for each type of resection surgery. However, presence of a complication is associated with delays in TTAC and is over three-fold more prevalent in open than laparoscopic resections. Therefore, there is an increased risk of delay in TTAC for open resection surgeries than laparoscopic resections due to a higher prevalence of surgical complications.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 4675-4683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Rickert ◽  
Florian Herrle ◽  
Fabian Doyon ◽  
Stefan Post ◽  
Peter Kienle

MedPharmRes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-9
Author(s):  
Phan Minh Tri ◽  
Do Hoai Ky ◽  
Vo Truong Quoc ◽  
Doan Tien My ◽  
Pham Huu Thien Chi

Introduction: The tumor of pancreatic body and tail are relatively rare compared to those of head of pancreas. Splenic preservation in pancreatic carcinoma’s surgery should be decided on every case. This study to determine the feasibility of distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation, the rate of early complications of splenectomy surgery to preserve the spleen and the factors: tumor size, tumor location, tumor characteristic to help assess the possibility of preserving the splenic vessels in distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. Methods: retrospective study, case series description for all patients aged 16 years and older with distal pancreatectomy and splenic preservation from 01/01/2012 to 31/12/2017. Result: We had 47 case of distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. There were 26 cases of splenic preservation with preserving the splenic vessels (Kimura technique), 13 cases of splenectomy but not preserving the splenic vessels (Warshaw technique). There were 16 cases of laparoscopic surgery, 31 cases open surgery, general complication in surgery 11 cases. The mean age was 41.13 (17-76 years old). The mean hospital stay was 7.7 days (3 days - 21 days). General complication after surgery in 7 cases, pancreatic fistula in 5 cases, no cases need re-operation, no mortality. Conclusion: The rate of intraopertative incidence was 23.4%; complications after surgery 14.9%. No case of re-operation or mortality in the study. Factors such as tumor size, tumor location, tumor characteristic did not help assess the possibility of preserving the splenic vessels in of distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1515-1521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridie S. Thompson ◽  
Michael D. Coory ◽  
Louisa G. Gordon ◽  
John W. Lumley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document