“External Counterpressure” and “Internal Distention” for Optimal Laryngoscopic Exposure of the Anterior Glottal Commissure

1994 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Zeitels ◽  
Charles W. Vaughan

External laryngeal counterpressure and internal laryngeal distention produce forces that are helpful for enhancing laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior glottis. These principles were formally described in the early 20th century, but are seldom used today. Hand pressure has been the typical source for external counterpressure. Since this maneuver is unstable if provided by an assistant and wasteful if provided by the surgeon, it is often neglected. Current phonomicrosurgical techniques require wider glottal exposure; therefore, a reexamination of the value of external counterpressure and internal distention is worthwhile. During the last 2 years, 125 microlaryngoscopic procedures were performed for a variety of benign, premalignant, and malignant lesions. All patients were placed in the Boyce-Jackson position and sustained with a modified Killian gallows, with resulting elevated-vector suspension. Internal distention was achieved by placing the largest-lumen glottiscope possible between the endotracheal tube and the infrapetiole region. Exposure was also improved by using silk adhesive tape to apply external counterpressure to the lower laryngeal framework. The use of both external counterpressure and internal distention as an adjunct to microlaryngoscopy was most helpful for the surgical management of lesions located near the anterior commissure. Seemingly, the two resultant forces are in opposition to each other, but in fact they are complementary, both to each other and to the orthodox laryngoscopic principle of elevated-vector suspension.

Author(s):  
Aleksey A. Soloviev

On the history of the first public libraries in the province towns of Vladimirskaya and Kostromskaya provinces in the second half of the 17th century - early 20th century. The author considers main statistical data of libraries and analyses necessity and influence of these libraries and reading rooms on the native population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-47
Author(s):  
Chinpulat Kurbanov ◽  

The author in this scientific article examines the stage-by-stage development and formation of customs in Turkestan in the second half of the 19th -early 20th centuries. The author studied the history of customs in Turkestan and its role in establishing a single customs line in the future with neighboring khanates. The author focuses on the role of Russia in the establishment of a single customs line and the development of customs in Turkestan


2018 ◽  
pp. 1274-1279
Author(s):  
Elena V. Olimpieva ◽  

The article reviews O. A. Shashkova’s ‘... Call the Mute Artifacts to Speech.’ Essays on the History of Archaeography of the 15th - Early 20th Century. Wide array of sources and broad geographical frameworks allow Shashkova to present emergence and development of Russian and European archaeography from the 15th to early 20th century intelligibly enough for educational purposes. A whole chapter is devoted to the manuscript tradition and publishing of sources before Gutenberg. When considering the formation of archaeographical tradition, the author uses comparative method. O. A. Shashkova offers a historical overview and analyzes theoretical and practical issues of archaeography. The reviewer notes the significance of the chosen topic due to a need to reconsider the development of publishing in light of modern views on archaeography and to make it accessible to students and non-professionals. She notes traditional academic approach of O. A. Shashkova to presentation of the development publication practices. The review considers the possibility of using the ‘Essays...’ in studying the history of archaeography and offers possible directions for a broader consideration of historical experience, in particular, of Novikov’s publication projects. The review notes the controversial nature of the author’s approach to systematization of her large historical material in order to consider issues concerning the study of archaeographical practices. It stresses that coverage of issues of development of methods of preparation of publications separately from its historical and practical aspects hinders successful mastering of the material by an untrained reader. It concludes that the publication has high practical value for specialists in archaeography and students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document