Juvenile Justice in New Zealand: a New Paradigm

1993 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Morris ◽  
Gabrielle M Maxwell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Family Group ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Youth Court ◽  
Principal Mechanism ◽  
Family Group Conference ◽  
The Family ◽  
Principal Decision Making

This study describes the system of juvenile justice adopted in New Zealand under the Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1989. The Act sets out objectives and principles which stress a number of innovative features including the integration of a western and an indigenous approach; the empowerment of families and young people; the involvement of victims; and group consensus decision-making. The principal mechanism for achieving these objectives is the Family Group Conference which replaces or supplements the Youth Court as the principal decision-making forum in most of the more serious cases. Police involvement in decision-making is also increased by a greater emphasis on diversion and by their role in reaching agreements in the Family Group Conference. Research data are presented which enable an evaluation of the extent to which the Act is meeting its objectives. The tensions in the system are discussed: particularly the issue of victim involvement versus an offender focus and the conflict between accountability and welfare.

Re-Forming Juvenile Justice: The New Zealand Experiment

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALLISON MORRIS ◽  
GABRIELLE MAXWELL
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Young People ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Youth Justice ◽  
Youth Court ◽  
Family Group Conference ◽  
The Family ◽  
New Process

This article describes the system of youth justice adopted in New Zealand in 1989, which introduced a number of radical and innovative features including the involvement of young people, families, and victims in deciding how best to deal with the offending. The principle mechanism for achieving this is the family group conference, which replaces or supplements the Youth Court as the principle decision-making forum in most of the more serious cases. Research data are presented that indicate that, to a large extent, this new process is working well and may be having an impact on reconviction figures.

The Children Young Persons and their Families Act 1989

1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Hassall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
The State ◽  
Family Group ◽  
Youth Justice ◽  
Family Group Conference ◽  
Child Services ◽  
The Family ◽  
Justice And Care

Since November 1989 New Zealand has had new statutory care and protection and youth justice procedures. They differ substantially from the procedures under the old 1974 act. For the majority of cases, the disposition of the child, services provided and, in the case of offending, any penalties or restitution imposed are now the responsibility of the family rather than the Court.This responsibility is exercised through a new official process called the Family Group Conference, at which the State is represented but in which the decision-making power is expected to rest largely with the family. Only if this fails or if the offence falls into the most serious of categories is the matter passed to the Court. A new group of officials has been created to co-ordinate the process. They are known as Youth Justice and Care and Protection Co-ordinators.

Family Group Conferences: Partnership in Practice

1996 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray Ryburn ◽  
Celia Atherton
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Work Practice ◽  
Social Work Practice ◽  
Family Group ◽  
Family Group Conference ◽  
Model Based ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Uk

The quality of relationship between families and professionals is clearly crucial to the development of good social work practice, especially where the care and protection of children are concerned. After tracing the origins of the Family Group Conference in New Zealand, Murray Ryburn and Celia Atherton describe the procedure and explain how this model, based on a commitment to partnership, is being adapted and used in the UK.

scholarly journals “They feel like it’s all based around the offender”: Professionals explore how victim participation in family group conferences can be enhanced

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy Williams ◽  
Julia Ioane
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Family Group ◽  
Culturally Appropriate ◽  
Youth Justice ◽  
Family Group Conference ◽  
The Family ◽  
Victim Participation ◽  
Collaborative Efforts

INTRODUCTION: The Family Group Conference (FGC) is one of Aotearoa New Zealand’s most innovative features to emerge in the Oranga Tamariki Act (1989). It was designed to address the harm caused by youth offending, as well as set the scene for reconciliation to allow victims to heal. However, victim participation at such conferences remains low.METHODS: This study focused on a 6-month pilot project in 2019 between the agencies of New Zealand Police, Oranga Tamariki and Victim Support, that aimed to increase victim participation at FGCs within the Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland) area. Rates of victim participation were tracked and six professionals were interviewed for their observations on the pilot.FINDINGS: Victim participation in FGCs increased during the project and interviewees identified that there had been more collaborative efforts between the professionals involved. Thematic analysis highlighted issues with 1) Agency processes and systems (with more training and resources needed, and more streamlined processes between the three agencies called for); 2) Information (youth justice information and cases were “too complicated,” and tended to be offender-focused, not necessarily understanding victim’s perspectives nor getting feedback from them); and 3) Timing (improved processes were needed around timely police referrals and there were effects of timeframes overall on victim participation).CONCLUSIONS: Participants recommended building on this exploratory pilot to increase and maintain better outcomes. The importance of victims being well-prepared for FGCs, feeling well-supported in making an in-person submission, in culturally appropriate ways, needs timely collaboration between well-trained and well-resourced professionals from the agencies involved.

A guide to convening a FGC

2018 ◽  
pp. 35-50
Author(s):  
Deanna Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Family Group ◽  
Family Group Conference ◽  
Ongoing Training ◽  
The Family ◽  
Training And Support

This chapter provides guidance for convening a family group conference (FGC). The FGC process is designed to be family-led and empowering. As much of the decision-making as possible should therefore be undertaken by the family, including decisions about the practicalities of the meeting. It is also important to consider the role that advocates can play in ensuring that the views of vulnerable family members are represented. An FGC can only be an empowering process for families if individuals are enabled to express their views. Ultimately, it is a complex and time-consuming piece of work and should be undertaken by a skilled and well-trained and supported coordinator. Indeed, ongoing training and support for coordinators is crucial and should include full FGC training, safeguarding training, and shadowing opportunities.

The Family Group Conference: A new paradigm for making decisions about children and young people

1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle M Maxwell ◽  
Allison Morris
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Young Person ◽  
Family Group ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Cultural Appropriateness ◽  
Family Group Conference ◽  
The Family ◽  
Consensus Decision Making

The involvement of the State In the lives of children, young people and their families has taken a new turn in New Zealand since 1989. Now when a child or young person is in need of care or protection or had offended, matters are resolved with their participation and with the participation of their family. At the heart of the new system is the Family Group Conference which is a new forum for consensus decision-making and which is potentially adaptable to different cultural practices. Institutionalisation of the young has been drastically reduced. Families remain a part of the lives of their children. However practice problems remain, goals of cultural appropriateness have not always been achieved and services have not always been made available to enhance the wellbeing of children and young people or to strengthen their families.

Juvenile Justice in New Zealand: A New Paradigm

2017 ◽  
pp. 53-71
Author(s):  
Allison Morris ◽  
Gabrielle M Maxwell†
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
New Paradigm
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document