A Longitudinal Study of Developmental and Behavioral Screening and Referral in North Carolina’s Assuring Better Child Health and Development Participating Practices

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 824-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian F. Earls ◽  
Joseph E. Andrews ◽  
Sherry S. Hay
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1960 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-521
Author(s):  
HOWARD V. MEREDITH

This research monograph is based on dental casts for 184 white children residing in Massachusetts and Delaware. The topics discussed pertain to tooth size, dental arch size, and positional interrelationships of the teeth in the two arches. On each subject, the investigator had available a series of dental casts "covering the transition from the primary to the secondary dentition" (p. 40). The casts were amassed in part at the Center for Research in Child Health and Development, Boston (Dr. Harold C. Stuart), and in part at a public school in Wilmington, Delaware (Dr. Richard H. Stucklen).


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1039-1041
Author(s):  
OSCAR C. STINE

This book is a timely addition to the pediatrician's library. The education, practice and philosophy of the specialty of pediatrics are expanding in understanding of and services for the healthy child. The authors, representing five medical specialties and four nonmedical disciplines, offer contributions to the pediatrician for this progress. The relationship between episodes of illness and the health and development of the child is discussed by Dr. Isabelle Valadian. Examples for illustration are taken from children in the Harvard Longitudinal Study of Child Health and Development. Two chapters will serve as reviews of pediatric information for most pediatricians. The first is a summary of the natural development of immunities and the artificial induction of immunities. The second is a clinical description of physiological conditions in the newborn that are consistent with health. Their clarity and simplicity will serve usefully in teaching.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Wallenborn ◽  
D Mäusezahl ◽  
A Castellanos ◽  
D McCoy ◽  
C e Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract About 250 million children under age five are at risk of not reaching their developmental potential due to continued exposure to ill health, malnutrition and lack of appropriate learning environments. A large number of initiatives have been launched in recent years to support early childhood development, with home visiting programs increasingly being recognized as a key strategy for improving child wellbeing. However, the most effective ways to reach families in low income settings remain unclear due to the large expense associated with personal family visits. In this project, we assess the effectiveness and equity of a newly developed digital platform designed to deliver evidence-based, individualized parenting support through automated services. The Afinidata platform uses state-of-the art machine learning algorithms to allow caregivers to get answers to questions about child health and development, while also identifying and promoting age- and development-appropriate activities for parents to support their children. We will collaborate with partners in Peru to rigorously assess the reach, impact and cost effectiveness of this digital platform in a poor rural population through a randomized controlled trial. Our work will follow a mixed-methods evaluation approach with repeated feedback into the Afinidata system. A total of 2,400 newborns will be enrolled in a randomized controlled trial in San Marcos, Peru, and followed up for two years. The primary study outcome will be children's healthy development at 24 months of age assessed through the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III). Secondary outcomes will be systems utilization, program coverage and cost-effectiveness, as well as caregiver satisfaction. If proven effective, this innovative digital platform may increase global access to low-cost parental support -a widely recognized key strategy for improving child well-being.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 656-658
Author(s):  
David Rush ◽  
Zena Stein ◽  
Mervyn Susser

The three commentaries on our recent paper1 by Drs Barness,2 Jacobson,3 and Hegsted4 pose thoughtful questions, which require serious consideration and reply. The study was complicated, of long duration, and it was costly in money, time, and energy. The National Institute of Child Health and Development scrupulously sought to protect its investment; we were site-visited by scientific peers no fewer than seven times. Indeed, both Drs Jacobson and Hegsted served twice on site visit committees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document