The Efficient Course of Action in "Trouble Shooting" as a Joint Function of Probability and Cost

1955 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence M. Stolurow ◽  
Bruce Bergum ◽  
Thomas Hodgson ◽  
John Silva
1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence M. Stolurow ◽  
Bruce Bergum ◽  
Thomas Hodgson ◽  
John Silva

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Simon ◽  
Keith J. Holyoak

Abstract Cushman characterizes rationalization as the inverse of rational reasoning, but this distinction is psychologically questionable. Coherence-based reasoning highlights a subtler form of bidirectionality: By distorting task attributes to make one course of action appear superior to its rivals, a patina of rationality is bestowed on the choice. This mechanism drives choice and action, rather than just following in their wake.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
Klaus Moser ◽  
Hans-Georg Wolff ◽  
Roman Soucek

Abstract. Escalation of commitment occurs when a course of action is continued despite repeated drawbacks (e.g., maintaining an employment relationship despite severe performance problems). We analyze process accountability (PA) as a de-escalation technique that helps to discontinue a failing course of action and show how time moderates both the behavioral and cognitive processes involved: (1) Because sound decisions should be based on (hopefully unbiased) information search, which requires time to gather, the effect of PA on de-escalation increases over time. (2) Because continuing information search creates behavioral commitment, the debiasing effect of PA on information search diminishes over time. (3) Consistent with the tunnel vision notion, the effects of less biased information search on de-escalation decrease over time.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerzy W. Rozenblit ◽  
◽  
Michael J. Barnes ◽  
Faisal Momen ◽  
Jose A. Quijada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document