National Survey of Identification Practices in Gifted and Talented Education

1981 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Alvino ◽  
Rebecca C. McDonnel ◽  
Susanne Richert
Keyword(s):  
Standardized Testing ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Gifted And Talented ◽  
Educational Improvement ◽  
University Professors ◽  
Gifted And Talented Education ◽  
Federal Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Identification Practices ◽  
Recurrent Patterns

This paper describes the results of a national survey of identification practices in the field of gifted and talented education. The survey was conducted by the Educational Improvement Center-South under a contract from the U.S. Office of the Gifted and Talented. Teachers of the gifted, university professors, state consultants, and others were queried as to what constitutes the most frequently and effectively used tests/instruments/techniques in the identification process vis-à-vis the categories of the federal definition and certain subpopulations. Survey data is analyzed for existent and recurrent patterns and trends. Among the findings disclosed are abuses of standardized testing and other inappropriate practices, apparent confusion over the definition of giftedness, and Jack of understanding regarding what should and should not be used for identification under each category.

Educational Policies Influencing State Response to Gifted and Talented Education Between 1977 and 1980

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-132
Author(s):  
Pamela Fine Miller ◽  
Tom Ward
Keyword(s):  
Gifted And Talented ◽  
The United States ◽  
Educational Policies ◽  
State Response ◽  
Gifted And Talented Education ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Talented Students ◽  
State Educational ◽  
State Expenditures ◽  
State Plan

Several educational policies and state characteristics have been cited in the literature as having a beneficial influence upon state response to gifted and talented education. These include: 1. state mandated programs for gifted and talented students. 2. state certification of teachers of gifted and talented students. 3. state plan for gifted and talented education. 4. state statutes governing the administration of gifted and talented programs. 5. state educational agency personnel assigned to gifted and talented education. 6. state utilization of Title IV-C funding for gifted and talented programs. 7. administration of gifted and talented programs through special education. 8. state definition of giftedness and talent. 9. level of state expenditures for gifted and talented education. This study sought to ascertain the influence of these selected educational policies and state characteristics on the level of state services provided gifted and talented students and state expenditures provided to support such services observed across the states between 1977 and 1980. Results of this investigation revealed that educational policy, per se, has had little influence upon the level of state services provided gifted and talented students across the United States. However, the selected set of educational policies exerted a moderate influence upon the level of state expenditures for gifted and talented education observed across states between 1977 and 1980. Finally, it was observed that states have become more homogeneous in their response to policy in the area of gifted and talented education over time.

The Masking Effect

2016 ◽  
pp. 220-231
Author(s):  
Jessica Cannaday
Keyword(s):  
Gifted And Talented ◽  
Masking Effect ◽  
Exceptional Students ◽  
Twice Exceptional ◽  
Identification Methods ◽  
Gifted And Talented Education ◽  
Exceptional Student ◽  
Multiple Differentiation ◽  
Intelligence Theory ◽  
Identification Practices

Twice exceptional students, those who are both gifted and have learning or behavioral difficulties, are an often under-served population. This chapter recommends approaching twice exceptional student needs holistically using a Response to Intervention model. The chapter defines the twice exceptional learner, and discusses intelligence theory in relation to both giftedness and twice exceptionality. The chapter further recommends a combination of RtI universal screening identification practices and traditional gifted and talented education identification methods, as well as multiple differentiation techniques to support the needs of this special population.

scholarly journals The HTR Model for Well-Being in Educating Community

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Falaschi
Keyword(s):  
Gifted And Talented ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Educational Effectiveness ◽  
Specific Training ◽  
Gifted And Talented Education ◽  
High Potentials ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Very High ◽  
Human Potentials

With the aim of enhancing human capital by bringing out talents, this paper offers a theoretical model for innovating teaching/learning methodological approaches. The Humor Talent Resilience (HTR) Model for Well-Being in Educating Community recognizes Humor as a pedagogical device that jointly feeds both Talent and Resilience. This nourishment triggers a dynamic process between Talent and Resilience of reciprocal and constant interdependence, while developing a mutual positive contamination in continuous evolution. This process is itself a “generator of Well-Being” but it will be able to fully convey its educational effectiveness only if it is supported by an Educating Community. While aknowledging the enhancement of all human potentials, including the high or very high potentials, the pedagogy of Well-Being must assume the educational responsibility of offering teaching/learning contexts that allow all students to reach their highest level of development. Three open reflections are presented: the concepts of justice and equity of educational policies and practices aimed at respecting and enhancing all human potentials; the virtual educating (or dis-educating) community; the need for specific training for teachers and more opportunities for international discussion in the field of gifted and talented education.

Styles of Leadership Training

G/C/T ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 9-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Harry Passow
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Gifted And Talented ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gifted Child ◽  
Child Education ◽  
Definition Of

The United States Office of Education includes leadership in its comprehensive definition of giftedness. In this address, Dr. Passow discusses the concept of leadership in general and then shares with the reader his ideas on the specifics of developing leaders in the area of gifted child education. Originally presented at the Office of Gifted and Talented (U.S.O.E.) sponsored Institute on Leadership Training and the Gifted, Chicago, Illinois, June 3, 1978, Styles of Leadership Training is reproduced here for G/C/T's readers.

Toward a Definition of a Gifted and Talented Teacher

2019 ◽  
pp. 254-274
Author(s):  
Meta Lee Van Sickle ◽  
Julie D. Swanson ◽  
Julianna Ridenhour
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Gifted And Talented ◽  
Gifted Education ◽  
Education Literature ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Individual

What shapes an individual into a teacher who is gifted and talented? How does one identify gifted or talented educators in education classes or in the schools? In an exploration of these questions, the authors review related gifted education literature to ground the synthesis of auto-ethnographies and case studies in what is known. Using grounded theory, the researchers analyze the stories of GATE teachers in Chapters 4 – 15 and identify common themes. The researchers use these findings to create a definition of the individual who is a gifted and talented teacher.

Getting the Dialogue Started

2019 ◽  
pp. 12-21
Author(s):  
Judith A. Bazler ◽  
Letitia Graybill ◽  
Alex Romagnoli
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Teacher Preparation ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Educational Research ◽  
Gifted And Talented ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Gifted Students ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Gifted And Talented Education ◽  
The University

This chapter provides a description of Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) teachers and supports that description through research and a professional discussion between two experienced educators at the university level. A brief literature review is first provided with an emphasis on how established research in the field of “gifted” students informs research on GATE teachers. The chapter then focuses on a professional discussion between two teacher educators who specialize in science education. During the discussion, which is interspersed and framed in educational research, the educators identify the elements of GATE teachers, analyze how GATE teachers are identified, and how to maintain GATE teachers during teacher preparation and as professionals in the field. Finally, implications for education preparation programs are provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document