Cultural competency and the reproduction of White supremacy in occupational therapy education

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Lyne Grenier

Background: In this two-part paper, critical race theory is used as an analytic tool to examine how anti-Blackness, anti-Indigenous colonial relations and Orientalism have and continue to influence the ways in which occupational therapy is taught and practised in Canada. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to incite reflection on the ongoing oppressive narratives that pervade occupational therapy education and support culturally unsafe practices. Methods: Through the lenses of liberal multiculturalism, liberal recognition politics and neoliberal capitalism, the author demonstrates how notions of ‘cultural competency’ are the logical product of an institutionalised racism that functions as a tool for the reproduction of White supremacy and racism in healthcare and healthcare education. Conclusions: Findings challenge the ongoing use of cultural competency frameworks in healthcare systems and education and propose a radical shift towards critical and structural frameworks.

2021 ◽  
pp. 000841742110058
Author(s):  
Marie-Lyne Grenier

Background. Patient case formulations have become a standard feature in occupational therapy (OT) education. Despite their demonstrated benefits in optimizing student learning, patient case formulations may unintentionally convey oppressive disability discourses. Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate and invite critical reflection on the use of patient case formulations in reinforcing ableist discourses and assumptions in OT education and practice. Key Issues. Through the lens of critical disability theory and Crip theory, the author demonstrates how patient case formulations are often reflective of institutionalized ableism that functions to support oppressive disability discourses in the profession, contributing to harmful healthcare practices. Implications. The ongoing use of patient case formulations rooted in oppressive disability discourses perpetuates oppressive constructions of disabled people in OT education and practice. A radical shift towards pedagogical materials and practices that support identity-affirming disability discourses would be more aligned with the profession’s expressed values.


2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen M. Madill ◽  
Gail Amort-Larson ◽  
Sylvia A. Wilson ◽  
Sharon G. Brintnell ◽  
Elizabeth Taylor ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie Dunn ◽  
Mary Ann Boyle

This study compared data collected from two questionnaires completed by faculty in professional occupational therapy education programs in the United States. The questionnaires asked respondents to describe their funding requests over two time periods; 1985 through 1987 and 1988 through 1990. The data from the first time period was reported elsewhere (Boyle, Dunn, & Kielhofner, 1990); this article presents the data from the second inquiry and compares the data from the two time periods to show trends. Programs submitted a total of 24 requests intramurally and 194 requests extramurally for a total of 218 requests during the second time period. Programs received full or partial funding for 115 proposals, a total of nearly $15 million, which was an increase of approximately $2 million. Research was funded at $1,865,500 ( n=35), a more than $1 million increase from the first time period. Programs received $5,725,790 for training ( n=35), $28,450 for model programs ( n=2), $1,326,614 for research and demonstration ( n=6), and $5,804,689 for other activities ( n=37).


2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Lysaght ◽  
Catherine Donnelly ◽  
Michelle Villeneuve

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document