Consequences of the 2008 US Elections for America's Climate Change Policy, Canada, and the World

Author(s):  
John Kirton
Energy ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1121-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Levine ◽  
Jayant A. Sathaye ◽  
Paul P. Craig ◽  
Stephen C. Peck

2021 ◽  
pp. 425-444
Author(s):  
Navraj Singh Ghaleigh ◽  
Louise Burrows

This chapter argues that ambitious climate action should be central to the “new normal” in Asia and that law has an important role in delivering it. From the perspective of climate change policy and law, the Covid-19 catastrophe offers the slim possibility that the world will “build back better,” restoring societies and economies along climate-friendly lines. This approach—resetting—envisages national stimulus packages and allied actions of central banks and financial regulators which are oriented toward economic growth and net-zero emission pathways in the months and years following Covid-19. The alternative narrative—reversion—identifies a recovery trajectory in which policies that are supportive of carbon-intensive pathways push the Paris Agreement targets further out of reach. Components of such recovery packages include unconditional bailouts for the fossil fuel sector and conventional mobility. The chapter then explores the tension between these two approaches in the immediate response to Covid-19, focussing on the coal sector as an emblematic variable in climate change debates.


Federalism-E ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-27
Author(s):  
Yvonne Leung

The problem of anthropogenic climate change is arguably one of the foremost pressing issues facing the world today. With that, governments around the world have been working together to put forward binding targets and agreements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in their respective jurisdictions. The most famous example of these multilateral efforts has culminated in the Kyoto Protocol, which was formally ratified by the Canadian government in 2002. However, despite this ratification, the federal government has failed to meet its reduction targets or legislate any substantial policy that would effectively regulate and reduce emissions. Indeed, rather than seeing emission levels fall, Canada’s overall GHG emissions have increased substantially.1[...]


2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Weaver

Never before in history have we known so much about the earth and our interactions with it. Science has been a great investment, and now scientists the world over are sending a solemn warning: we are changing the climate, and the threat this poses to the economy and society is significant. These threats are not merely a marginal concern. They relate to the natural resource backbone of economic and political life.


2010 ◽  
pp. 115-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Agibalov ◽  
A. Kokorin

Copenhagen summit results could be called a failure. This is the failure of UN climate change policy management, but definitely the first step to a new order as well. The article reviews main characteristics of climate policy paradigm shifts. Russian interests in climate change policy and main threats are analyzed. Successful development and implementation of energy savings and energy efficiency policy are necessary and would sufficiently help solving the global climate change problem.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Godínez-Zamora ◽  
Luis Victor-Gallardo ◽  
Jam Angulo-Paniagua ◽  
Eunice Ramos ◽  
Mark Howells ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Gittell ◽  
Josh Stillwagon

<p>This paper explores the influence of US state-level policies meant to address climate change on clean technology industry development. The largest influence of climate change policies is identified as being on energy research employment. Only some policies seem to contribute positively to clean tech employment while other policies appear to discourage employment growth. The magnitudes of the short term effects, even when statistically significant, are modest. Negative impacts on employment are identified for several mandate-oriented, so called command and control, policies including vehicle greenhouse gas standards, energy efficiency resource standards, and renewable portfolio standards with the former two having increasing negative effects over time. The findings suggest that climate change policy advocates should be careful to not assume that there will be positive clean tech employment benefits from state-level energy and environmental policies. Instead, the benefits from these policies may derive primarily from other considerations beyond the scope of this paper, including health and environmental benefits and reduction of dependence on foreign energy sources.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document