Mastery Learning in the Regular Classroom: Help for At-Risk Students with Learning Disabilities

1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Guskey ◽  
Perry D. Passaro ◽  
Wayne Wheeler
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Abelman ◽  
Anthony Molina

In two recent publications, we reported that the academic intervention process, not the specific intervention content, was responsible for a short-and long-term influx in at-risk student performance (grade-point average) and persistence (retention). All at-risk students who participated in the most intrusive of three interventions had higher cumulative grade-point averages and retention rates than those who received less intrusive interventions. In this post hoc analysis, we looked at probationary students with learning disabilities and found that they are only responsive to the individual attention and personalized accommodation provided under a highly intrusive model, and the impact is temporary.


1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. McCleery ◽  
Gerald A. Tindal

Increased attention is being devoted to the development of science literacy as repeated findings demonstrate students' lack of scientific understanding. To provide all students an opportunity to become science-literate, significant changes have been proposed in both the content being addressed and the instructional practices being used in teaching science. In this study, we manipulated both of these facets to teach the scientific method to at-risk students and students with learning disabilities. The content was framed with concepts and principles, and instruction was explicit, using rules to guide classroom activities. A combination of classroom observations and problem-solving tasks yielded significant differences between students taught with this enhanced approach over that achieved when instruction simply provided hands-on constructivistic activities not anchored to concepts or not explicitly delivered through rules.


2020 ◽  
pp. 105345122094437
Author(s):  
Marney S. Pollack ◽  
Alexandra Shelton ◽  
Erin Clancy ◽  
Christopher J. Lemons

Several strategies that demonstrate promise are available for educators to improve reading comprehension outcomes for students. However, some students, including students with and at risk for learning disabilities, require more intensive supports to develop proficiency in reading comprehension. To support these students, teachers must intensify instruction. This article describes an intensive main idea identification strategy, sentence-level gist, for teachers to use with students with persistent reading comprehension difficulties in the co-taught classroom. The sentence-level gist strategy requires students to determine the subject and important words in each sentence and then synthesize this information to write a main idea statement for a section of a text.


2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose M. Allinder ◽  
Lynette Dunse ◽  
Cynthia D. Brunken ◽  
Heidi J. Obermiller-Krolikowski

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Graham ◽  
Tracey E. Hall

In today’s world, writing is an essential skill. At school, writing is often used to gauge students’ understanding of content material as well as to promote the learning of it. Students with learning disabilities (LD) and those at risk for writing difficulties experience considerable difficulty with almost every aspect of writing. The field of LD is developing a reasonable foundation of knowledge about what and how students with LD and those at risk for LD write. The articles in this series contribute to our growing knowledge of how students with LD struggle with the writing process and can benefit from evidence-based practices, beginning in elementary school and continuing into college. The purpose of this article is to introduce the special series on writing and writing difficulties. Three of the articles are included in this issue, and the two remaining articles will appear in the next issue. This introduction provides readers with the rationale for the series, the purpose of each article, and a brief overview of each contribution.


2021 ◽  
pp. 073194872110182
Author(s):  
Yewon Lee ◽  
Susan De La Paz

Writing in science can be challenging for all learners, and it is especially so for students with cognitive or language-based learning difficulties. Yet, we know very little about how to support students with learning disabilities (LD) or who are English learners (EL) when asked to write for authentic purposes during science instruction. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of 14 high-quality studies to identify effective writing instruction elements for students with LD, those who are EL, and for at-risk learners more generally. We analyzed the studies according to purpose, participants, dependent variables, and interventions. Then, we categorized instructional elements into two broad types of support: (a) cognitive skills and processes, and (b) linguistic skills and processes. Quantitative analyses showed students (regardless of disability or language status) who received structured cognitive instruction on text features demonstrated substantial growth in writing. Conversely, although language in science differs from everyday language, it is absent from this literature. Thus, our findings provide insights into necessary cognitive and linguistic supports for these students, and implications for designing effective writing instruction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Bruhn ◽  
Shanna Hirsch ◽  
Kari Vogelgesang

Keeping students engaged in the curriculum is extremely important when attempting to close the achievement gap for students with and at risk for disabilities. This is particularly important for students with learning disabilities or behavior disorders. This article discusses the use of applications (apps) for mobile technologies that may be used to motivate and thus engage students in the classroom by supporting best instructional practices. These apps are matched to specific strategies that researchers have suggested for increasing motivation and engagement.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha K. Jitendra

In this introduction to the special issue, the author provides a brief overview of (a) standards-based mathematics and implications for students with learning disabilities and those at risk for mathematics difficulties and (b) research on mathematics interventions/instructional practices and student outcomes. Furthermore, the author highlights how the articles in this special issue address these areas. The article concludes with a description of the purposes of this special issue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document