Progress on the Journey to Total Quality Management: Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Adjective Check List in Management Development

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie G. Mani

The objective of this paper is to describe and assess a management development process utilized in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a public sector agency that has implemented Total Quality Management (TQM). The program described in this paper is unique to the Richmond District where the facilitator was qualified to enhance the process used in other offices by adding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator1 and The Adjective Check List.2 This paper is based on three premises. It is feasible for agencies, i. e., public bureaucracies, to implement the principles of Total Quality Management (TQM) and a growing number of them are trying to do so. Management commitment is a prerequisite for TQM so the need to develop effective, committed managers is increasingly critical. Programs designed to develop new managers can be enhanced when the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and The Adjective Check List are included as part of a self-assessment.

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin R. Brooks ◽  
Ray W. Johnson

The purpose of this paper was to provide information which might prove useful in the interpretation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A sample of 209 students provided self-descriptions from the adjectives on the Adjective Check List and took the Myers-Briggs. On the basis of Myers-Briggs scores the sample was divided by sex into groups of extraverts and introverts, sensing and intuitive, thinking and feeling, and judging and perceiving types. Adjectives characteristic of males and females in each group were derived by means of chi-square.


1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Wakefield ◽  
Jan Sasek ◽  
Melinda L. Brubaker ◽  
Alan F. Friedman

The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was compared by means of canonical analysis to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and to the Adjective Check List, with samples of 79 and 53 individuals, respectively. The results supported the validity of Eysenck's Extraversion and Neuroticism scales but gave less support for the validity of the Psychoticism scale.


1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Yi Wu ◽  
Henry A. Wiebe ◽  
John Politi

2013 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
Veeraphat Krittanathip ◽  
Sakchai Rakkarn ◽  
Suriyan Cha-um ◽  
Nuangruthai Timyaingam

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document