Self-Descriptive Adjectives Associated with a Jungian Personality Inventory

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin R. Brooks ◽  
Ray W. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Check List ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Adjective Check List ◽  
Intuitive Thinking ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
Males And Females

The purpose of this paper was to provide information which might prove useful in the interpretation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A sample of 209 students provided self-descriptions from the adjectives on the Adjective Check List and took the Myers-Briggs. On the basis of Myers-Briggs scores the sample was divided by sex into groups of extraverts and introverts, sensing and intuitive, thinking and feeling, and judging and perceiving types. Adjectives characteristic of males and females in each group were derived by means of chi-square.

Validity Study of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Wakefield ◽  
Jan Sasek ◽  
Melinda L. Brubaker ◽  
Alan F. Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Canonical Analysis ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Check List ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Adjective Check List ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was compared by means of canonical analysis to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and to the Adjective Check List, with samples of 79 and 53 individuals, respectively. The results supported the validity of Eysenck's Extraversion and Neuroticism scales but gave less support for the validity of the Psychoticism scale.

Progress on the Journey to Total Quality Management: Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Adjective Check List in Management Development

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie G. Mani
Keyword(s):  
Quality Management ◽  
Total Quality Management ◽  
Management Development ◽  
Total Quality ◽  
Check List ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Adjective Check List ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

The objective of this paper is to describe and assess a management development process utilized in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a public sector agency that has implemented Total Quality Management (TQM). The program described in this paper is unique to the Richmond District where the facilitator was qualified to enhance the process used in other offices by adding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator1 and The Adjective Check List.2 This paper is based on three premises. It is feasible for agencies, i. e., public bureaucracies, to implement the principles of Total Quality Management (TQM) and a growing number of them are trying to do so. Management commitment is a prerequisite for TQM so the need to develop effective, committed managers is increasingly critical. Programs designed to develop new managers can be enhanced when the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and The Adjective Check List are included as part of a self-assessment.

Examination of the Relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo Personality Inventory

1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. MacDonald ◽  
Peter E. Anderson ◽  
Catherine I. Tsagarakis ◽  
Cornelius J. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Introductory Psychology ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
The Relationship

The study examined the relationship between scores on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and on the NEO Personality Inventory by administering these measures to 161 women and 48 men in introductory psychology. Notable correlations were found for MBTI Introversion and Extraversion with NEO-PI Extraversion (– .58 and .58 for men, – .68 and .68 for women), MBTI Sensation and Intuition with NEO-PI Openness (– .60 and .71 for men, – .70 and .65 for women), MBTI Thinking and Feeling with NEO-PI Agreeableness (– .60 and .52 for men, – .41 and .39 for women), and MBTI Judging and Perceiving with NEO-PI Conscientiousness (.56 and – .62 for men, .49 and – .50 for women). These findings are consistent with McCrae and Costa (1989). Implications for interpretation of the scores are discussed.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REVISED NEO-PERSONALITY INVENTORY AND THE MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 577-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Furnham ◽  
Joanna Moutafi ◽  
John Crump
Keyword(s):  
Correlational Analysis ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Measures ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
The Relationship

This study investigated the relationship between two of the most widely used personality measures, the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A total of 900 participants completed the NEO PI-R and the MBTI. Correlational analysis of the personality measures showed that NEO PI-R Extraversion was correlated with MBTI Extraversion-Introversion, Openness was correlated with Sensing-Intuition, Agreeableness with Thinking-Feeling and Conscientiousness with Judging-Perceiving, replicating the findings of McCrae and Costa (1989).

Some Correlates of a Jungian Personality Inventory

1964 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 623-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. Stricker ◽  
John Ross
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
School Programs ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
High School Programs ◽  
Personality Typology

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is a self-report inventory which is intended to measure four variables stemming from the Jungian personality typology: extraversion-introversion, sensation-intuition, thinking-feeling, and judging-perceiving. The construct validity of each of its scales was assessed in a series of studies which investigated the scales' correlations with ability, interest, and personality scales and differences on the scales between the sexes and between students in different high school programs. The findings suggest that the Sensation-Intuition and Thinking-Feeling scales may reflect restricted aspects of the dimensions that they are intended to represent, and the Extraversion-introversion and Judging-Perceiving scales may reflect something quite different from their postulated dimensions.

Correlations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo Personality Inventory Facets

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. MacDonald ◽  
Peter E. Anderson ◽  
Catherine I. Tsagarakis ◽  
Cornelius J. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Female Undergraduate ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
Using Data

Using data obtained from 48 male and 161 female undergraduate students in psychology, correlations between scores on the scales of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the facets of the Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness domains of the NEO Personality Inventory were low to moderate.

Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: a study using the Neo Personality Inventory and the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Moutafi ◽  
Adrian Furnham ◽  
John Crump
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
The Past ◽  
Personality Predictors ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
Intelligence Scores ◽  
Negative Predictor

The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent personality, gender, and age can predict psychometric intelligence scores. A total of 900 participants completed the Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test, the Graduate Managerial Assessment: Abstract, the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, and the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator. Intelligence was found to be most consistently predicted by high Openness and low Neuroticism, which has been repeatedly reported in the past (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Kyllonen, 1997), as well as by low Extraversion and low Conscientiousness, which has also been previously reported (Furnham, Chamorro‐Premuzic, & Moutafi, under review). Of the demographic factors, there were no gender differences with respect to general intelligence (g), but age was found to be a significant negative predictor of g, in line with previous findings (Matthews, Davies, Westerman, & Stammers, 2000). Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Florence Nightingale

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara M. Dossey
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Illness ◽  
Spiritual Development ◽  
Personality Type ◽  
Work Output ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Intuitive Thinking ◽  
Florence Nightingale ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

This article casts new and refreshing light on Florence Nightingale’s life and work by examining her personality type. Using the theory-based Myers—Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), the author examines Nightingale’s personality type and reveals that she was an introverted-intuitive-thinking-judging type. The merit of using the MBTI is that it allows us to more clearly understand three major areas of Nightingale’s life that have been partially unacknowledged or misunderstood: her spiritual development as a practicing mystic, her management of her chronic illness to maintain her prodigious work output, and her chosen strategies to transform her visionary ideas into new health care and social realities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document