scholarly journals Community Diabetes: An East London Perspective

2005 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 96-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan V Gelding ◽  
Shanti Vijayaraghavan ◽  
Clare Davison ◽  
Tahseen A Chowdhury

The rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the UK has necessitated a change in the delivery of diabetes care, with a shift of focus from hospital to community. The National Service Framework for Diabetes has enshrined this approach, and the new General Medical Services (GMS2) contract rewards primary healthcare professionals for developing high-quality diabetes care. New approaches cross the primary/secondary care divide and are patient focused. The evolution of diabetes care in the UK is illustrated by service developments in Newham, East London.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soraia de Camargo Catapan ◽  
Uthara Nair ◽  
Len Gray ◽  
Maria Cristina Marino Calvo ◽  
Dominique Bird ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
R A Bulbulia ◽  
K R Poskitt

Leg ulcers are common and costly to treat, and the quality of care provided to patients with this condition varies widely across the UK. The introduction of specialized community-based leg ulcer clinics in Gloucestershire has been associated with increased ulcer healing rates and decreased rates of ulcer recurrence, but this model of care has not been widely replicated. One way of ending this ‘postcode lottery’ is to produce a National Service Framework for leg ulcers, with the aim of delivering high-quality evidence-based care via such clinics under the supervision of local consultant vascular surgeons. Existing National Service Frameworks cover a range of common conditions that are, like leg ulceration, associated with significant morbidity, disability and resource use. These documents aim to raise quality and decrease regional variations in health care across the National Health Service, and leg ulceration fulfils all the necessary criteria for inclusion in a National Service Framework. Centrally defined standards of care for patients with leg ulceration, and the reorganization and restructuring of local services to allow the accurate assessment and treatment of such patients are required. Without a National Service Framework to drive up the quality of care across the country, the treatment of patients with leg ulcers will remain suboptimal for the majority of those who suffer from this common and debilitating condition.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e019400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley McBain ◽  
Frederique Lamontagne-Godwin ◽  
Mark Haddad ◽  
Alan Simpson ◽  
Jacqui Chapman ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo establish healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) views about clinical roles, and the barriers and enablers to delivery of diabetes care for people with severe mental illness (SMI).DesignCross-sectional, postal and online survey.SettingTrusts within the National Health Service, mental health and diabetes charities, and professional bodies.ParticipantsHCPs who care for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or SMI in the UK.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe barriers, enablers and experiences of delivering T2DM care for people with SMI, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.ResultsRespondents were 273 HCPs, primarily mental health nurses (33.7%) and psychiatrists (32.2%). Only 25% of respondents had received training in managing T2DM in people with SMI. Univariate analysis found that mental health professionals felt responsible for significantly fewer recommended diabetes care standards than physical health professionals (P<0.001). For those seeing diabetes care as part of their role, the significant barriers to its delivery in the multiple regression analyses were a lack of knowledge (P=0.003); a need for training in communication and negotiation skills (P=0.04); a lack of optimism about the health of their clients (P=0.04) and their ability to manage T2DM in people with SMI (P=0.003); the threat of being disciplined (P=0.02); fear of working with people with a mental health condition (P=0.01); a lack of service user engagement (P=0.006); and a need for incentives (P=0.04). The significant enablers were an understanding of the need to tailor treatments (P=0.04) and goals (P=0.02) for people with SMI.ConclusionsThis survey indicates that despite current guidelines, diabetes care in mental health settings remains peripheral. Even when diabetes care is perceived as part of an HCP’s role, various individual and organisational barriers to delivering recommended T2DM care standards to people with SMI are experienced.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koo Wilson ◽  
John Marriott ◽  
Stephen Fuller ◽  
Loretto Lacey ◽  
David Gillen

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 705-712
Author(s):  
Hermione Price

Type 2 diabetes is common, and its prevalence is increasing. Most patients with type 2 diabetes are managed entirely in primary care. The National Diabetes Audit has provided evidence of large variations across the UK in the standard of available care in the community for patients with diabetes. Good diabetes care can prevent or delay complications and, as well as cost savings, this results in a better quality of life for patients. This article provides an overview of type 2 diabetes and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for treatment proposed in 2015.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document