Abstract. Updating climatological forcing data to near current data are compelling for impact modelling, e.g. to update model simulations or to simulate recent extreme events. Hydrological simulations are generally sensitive to bias in the meteorological forcing data, especially relative to the data used for the calibration of the model. The lack of daily resolution data at a global scale has previously been solved by adjusting re-analysis data global gridded observations. However, existing data sets of this type have been produced for a fixed past time period, determined by the main global observational data sets. Long delays between updates of these data sets leaves a data gap between present and the end of the data set. Further, hydrological forecasts require initialisations of the current state of the snow, soil, lake (and sometimes river) storage. This is normally conceived by forcing the model with observed meteorological conditions for an extended spin-up period, typically at a daily time step, to calculate the initial state. Here, we present a method named GFD (Global Forcing Data) to combine different data sets in order to produce near real-time updated hydrological forcing data that are compatible with the products covering the climatological period. GFD resembles the already established WFDEI method (Weedon et al., 2014) closely, but uses updated climatological observations, and for the near real-time it uses interim products that apply similar methods. This allows GFD to produce updated forcing data including the previous calendar month around the 10th of each month. We present the GFD method and different produced data sets, which are evaluated against the WFDEI data set, as well as with hydrological simulations with the HYPE model over Europe and the Arctic region. We show that GFD performs similarly to WFDEI and that the updated period significantly reduces the bias of the reanalysis data, although less well for the last two months of the updating cycle. For real-time updates until the current day, extending GFD with operational meteorological forecasts, a large drift is present in the hydrological simulations due to the bias of the meteorological forecasting model.