scholarly journals Communicating radiation risks to the residents of the Chernobyl-affected areas in Russia: key lessons learned

2021 ◽  
pp. 014664532110109
Author(s):  
I. Abalkina ◽  
E. Melikhova ◽  
M. Savkin

This paper does not necessarily reflect the views of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. This article analyses the communication experiences of radiation protection experts at federal/regional and local level. Efforts to justify protective measures were more successful at federal level, while the task of adjusting risk perception among local residents remains unresolved. At the recovery stage (15 years after the accident at Chernobyl nuclear power plant), the main difficulties were associated with the fact that expert knowledge was in conflict with public perception of the risk of low doses and legislative approaches. In these situations, communication success depends directly on an expert’s personality. When large areas are affected, the efforts of a few dedicated experts are clearly not sufficient. More systematic approaches (training of doctors, teachers, etc.) require governmental support and experienced personnel. Federal authorities had changed their attitudes by the 15th anniversary of the accident. However, at regional level, this process stretched out for another 15 years. Public perception of large-scale health consequences still persists. Examples and survey results are presented in this article.

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 110S-119S ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Miyazaki

Measurement of individual radiation dose is crucial for planning protective measures after nuclear accidents. The purpose of this article is to explain the various initiatives taken after the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, including the D-shuttle project wherein residents from affected areas wore a personal dosimeter to measure their own external exposure. The experience in Fukushima revealed several issues such as gaining residents’ trust and ensuring appropriate communication of the measured data. The D-shuttle project also revealed that obtaining individual dose measurement data had 2 purposes, as the information obtained was to be utilized by the residents for self-protection and by the authorities for deriving the dose distribution of the population to aid in designing large-scale protection measures. The lessons learned are that both the residents and the authorities need to understand and share the meaning of individual dose measurements and the measurement results must be used with due respect for the residents’ privacy and other concerns.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Miyazaki

Many initiatives to measure the internal and external exposures of the residents of Fukushima have been undertaken since the accident at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. However, residents have had few, if any, opportunities for face-to-face explanations to understand the meaning of such measurements. Although the personal data of tens of thousands of residents were collected, these data were not analysed adequately, and were therefore not used to implement large-scale programmes to manage/reduce exposures. One of the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident is that it is imperative for the government to implement these measures for radiation protection, and to build an effective functioning service for the residents. The author, as a physician from the region, has worked as an explainer/interpreter of exposure dose measurements to individual residents. Another lesson learned from this experience is that local medical and health professionals can contribute to building a public system for radiation protection, by acting as ‘liaising officers’ to connect residents, the authorities, and experts from outside the region. This paper describes the author’s experience and lessons learned in the hope that this information will be useful in the event of a future accident.


Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Gros

AREVA has been running since decades nuclear reprocessing and recycling installations in France. Several industrial facilities have been built and used to this aim across the time. Following those decades and with the more and more precise monitoring of the impact of those installations, precise data and lessons-learned have been collected that can be used for the stakeholders of potential new facilities. China has expressed strong interest in building such facilities. As a matter of fact, the issue of accumulation of spent fuel is becoming serious in China and jeopardizes the operation of several nuclear power plants, through the running out of space of storage pools. Tomorrow, with the extremely high pace of nuclear development of China, accumulation of spent fuel will be unbearable. Building reprocessing and recycling installations takes time. A decision has to be taken so as to enable the responsible development of nuclear in China. Without a solution for the back end of its nuclear fuel cycle, the development of nuclear energy will face a wall. This is what the Chinese central government, through the action of its industrial CNNC, has well understood. Several years of negotiations have been held with AREVA. Everybody in the sector seems now convinced. However, now that the negotiation is coming to an end, an effort should be done towards all the stakeholders, sharing actual information from France’s reference facilities on: safety, security, mitigation measures for health protection (of the workers, of the public), mitigation measures for the protection of the environment. Most of this information is public, as France has since years promulgated a law on Nuclear transparency. China is also in need for more transparency, yet lacks means to access this public information, often in French language, so let’s open our books!


2008 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 173-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Coffey ◽  
Thomas Eskridge

As populations age and large numbers of skilled workers progress toward retirement, the importance of preserving and sharing expert knowledge is becoming an increasing concern for organisations worldwide. This article contains descriptions of two case studies involving initiatives to elicit, preserve, and share expert knowledge in the nuclear power industry using a knowledge modeling toolkit named CmapTools and knowledge elicitation techniques that were originated at the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola, FL., USA. Along with an account of preparations for the work including the selection of the experts, the course of the sessions, results and impacts of the studies, missed opportunities, and lessons learned are described. Some similarities and some interesting differences between the case studies are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Gijs Jan Molenaar

The preparation for the construction of the Square Kilometre Array, and the introduction of its operational precursors, such as LOFAR and MeerKAT, mark the beginning of an exciting era for astronomy. Impressive new data containing valuable science just waiting for discovery is already being generated, and these devices will produce far more data than has ever been collected before. However, with every new data instrument, the data rates grow to unprecedented quantities of data, requiring novel new data-processing tools. In addition, creating science grade data from the raw data still requires significant expert knowledge for processing this data. The software used is often developed by a scientist who lacks proper training in software development skills, resulting in the software not progressing beyond a prototype stage in quality. In the first chapter, we explore various organisational and technical approaches to address these issues by providing a historical overview of the development of radioastronomy pipelines since the inception of the field in the 1940s. In that, the steps required to create a radio image are investigated. We used the lessons-learned to identify patterns in the challenges experienced, and the solutions created to address these over the years. The second chapter describes the mathematical foundations that are essential for radio imaging. In the third chapter, we discuss the production of the KERN Linux distribution, which is a set of software packages containing most radio astronomy software currently in use. Considerable effort was put into making sure that the contained software installs appropriately, all items next to one other on the same system. Where required and possible, bugs and portability fixes were solved and reported with the upstream maintainers. The KERN project also has a website, and issue tracker, where users can report bugs and maintainers can coordinate the packaging effort and new releases. The software packages can be used inside Docker and Singularity containers, enabling the installation of these packages on a wide variety of platforms. In the fourth and fifth chapters, we discuss methods and frameworks for combining the available data reduction tools into recomposable pipelines and introduce the Kliko specification and software. This framework was created to enable end-user astronomers to chain and containerise operations of software in KERN packages. Next, we discuss the Common Workflow Language (CommonWL), a similar but more advanced and mature pipeline framework invented by bio-informatics scientists. CommonWL is supported by a wide range of tools already; among other schedulers, visualisers and editors. Consequently, when a pipeline is made with CommonWL, it can be deployed and manipulated with a wide range of tools. In the final chapter, we attempt something unconventional, applying a generative adversarial network based on deep learning techniques to perform the task of sky brightness reconstruction. Since deep learning methods often require a large number of training samples, we constructed a CommonWL simulation pipeline for creating dirty images and corresponding sky models. This simulated dataset has been made publicly available as the ASTRODECONV2019 dataset. It is shown that this method is useful to perform the restoration and matches the performance of a single clean cycle. In addition, we incorporated domain knowledge by adding the point spread function to the network and by utilising a custom loss function during training. Although it was not possible to improve the cleaning performance of commonly used existing tools, the computational time performance of the approach looks very promising. We suggest that a smaller scope should be the starting point for further studies and optimising of the training of the neural network could produce the desired results.


Author(s):  
Rolando Orense ◽  
Suguru Yamada ◽  
Masahide Otsubo

A devastating earthquake hit the Tohoku and Kanto regions of Japan on 11 March 2011, causing extensive damage to life and property as a result of a large-scale tsunami and damage to nuclear power plants. Although located about 400 km away from the epicentre, many residential and commercial buildings and lifeline facilities in Tokyo Bay area suffered extensive damage due to soil liquefaction and associated ground deformation. This paper discusses the results of the damage investigation conducted in the area after the earthquake, with emphasis on liquefaction-induced damage to buildings, roads, lifelines and other infrastructure. In addition, the performance of ground improved by various remediation techniques is discussed. Finally, lessons learned from the event are summarised.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Reno Alamsyah

The Fukushima nuclear accident that occurred a decade ago has been considered a major accident. In this decade period, various important aspects of this accident were considered well-established for learning to improve nuclear safety infrastructure and prevent similar major accidents. The learning is very relevant for Indonesia, which is considered as an embarking country. Thus, this paper aims to assess the lessons that have been and can be learned by Indonesia from the nuclear accident. This study applies an analytical, descriptive and qualitative methodology using secondary data. In the first step, the important aspects of safety in the accident were identified applying the IAEA general safety requirement standards. The next step is the identification of relevant topics for each of these aspects in order to detail the lessons learned through an analysis of existing laws and regulations and international standards. This paper concludes that Indonesia has learned the lessons from the Fukushima nuclear accident in the aspects of international agreements, regulatory principles, and in accident prevention and mitigation. However, Indonesia still needs significant upgrading in the aspect’s leadership for safety and improvements in all these aspects. If a national decision has been made to build nuclear power plant, then these upgrading and improvements must be made to prevent a large-scale nuclear accident as happened at the Fukushima nuclear power plants.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin McGaffigan, MSW, MS, Public Policy ◽  
Chris Oliveira, BS ◽  
Diane Enochs, BA, MA

Continued challenges responding to large-scale emergencies are recognized in the aftermath of events such as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Elders and people with disabilities often included under the label of “vulnerable” or “special populations,” are especially hard hit given communication and accessibility barriers often faced even prior to an emergency. Approximately 15 percent of those living within our communities have disabilities, which jumps to 41 percent for those 65 years or older.1 The prevalence of functional limitations due to age or disability indicates the need for these factors to be accounted for in planning, response, recovery, and mitigation efforts at the national, state, and local level to ensure a truly effective emergency response system that meets the needs of all residents. To achieve this effort emergency management, public health, disability and elder stakeholders within Massachusetts joined together to identify the existing planning gaps and to explore potential solutions to support emergency preparedness so that emergency management systems are responsive to all individuals in the community, regardless of age or disability. The Commonwealth’s process and lessons learned are discussed later.


2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
Erin McGaffigan, MSW, MS, Public Policy ◽  
Chris Oliveira, BS ◽  
Diane Enochs, BA, MA

Continued challenges responding to large-scale emergencies are recognized in the aftermath of events such as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Elders and people with disabilities often included under the label of “vulnerable” or “special populations,” are especially hard hit given communication and accessibility barriers often faced even prior to an emergency. Approximately 15 percent of those living within our communities have disabilities, which jumps to 41 percent for those 65 years or older.1 The prevalence of functional limitations due to age or disability indicates the need for these factors to be accounted for in planning, response, recovery, and mitigation efforts at the national, state, and local level to ensure a truly effective emergency response system that meets the needs of all residents. To achieve this effort emergency management, public health, disability and elder stakeholders within Massachusetts joined together to identify the existing planning gaps and to explore potential solutions to support emergency preparedness so that emergency management systems are responsive to all individuals in the community, regardless of age or disability. The Commonwealth’s process and lessons learned are discussed later.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hayakawa

In Fukushima Prefecture, disaster-related death is a social problem for individuals who were forced to leave their hometowns as a result of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the accident at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Disaster-related death is caused by stress, exhaustion, and worsening of pre-existing illnesses due to evacuation. The number of disaster-related deaths has reached almost 2000, and continues to rise. Prolonged uncertainty and deteriorating living conditions suggest no end to such deaths, although response measures have been taken to improve the situation. It is said that insufficient response measures were taken, in particular, during the transitional period between the emergency phase and the reconstruction phase. There is a need to apply the lessons learned in planning for evacuation after a nuclear hazard, considering radiological protection as well as risks associated with evacuation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document