scholarly journals Expanding Our Resources: Including Community in the Resource-Based View of the Firm

2021 ◽  
pp. 014920632098728
Author(s):  
Cristina B. Gibson ◽  
Stephen C. Gibson ◽  
Quinn Webster
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Prior Work ◽  
Resource Based View ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Sustained Competitive Advantage ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
Strategic Resource ◽  
Theory Research

We apply insights from organizational behavior, psychology, and sociology to make the case that the community in which a firm is embedded is a valuable, rare, inimitable, and nonsubstitutable resource that holds potential as a source of sustained competitive advantage. First, we review several key principles of the resource-based view (RBV) and show how they apply to community as a strategic resource, incorporating prior work that simultaneously addresses communities and RBV. Next, we juxtapose pairs of firms in the same industries, comparing those that have embraced this strategy with those that have not, demonstrating the superior sustainability of the firms that consider community as a strategic resource. Finally, we conclude with thoughts as to a future research agenda that allows for an expansion of the concept of resources to further the development of RBV, the firms that apply it, and the communities in which they are embedded. In doing so, we demonstrate how expanding RBV to incorporate the community as strategic resource contributes to managerial theory, research, and practice.

Reframing the Compositional Capability: A Resource-Based View on ‘A Composition-Based View of Firm Growth’

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk W. Volberda ◽  
Emre Karali
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Firm Growth ◽  
Emerging Economy ◽  
Dynamic Capability ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Resource Based View ◽  
The Core ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
Conceptual Setting

This commentary targets the core ideas of the composition-based view (CBV). First, we argue that the deployment of compositional capabilities (CCs) to combine ordinary resources fits the resource-based view (RBV) and that there is therefore no need for a CBV. Second, we argue that the CCs should be presented as a specific type of dynamic capability (DC). We show that even where ordinary resources are being combined, superior combinatory capabilities are needed as competitive advantage cannot otherwise be achieved. Third, we argue that Luo and Child (2015) focused too much on the emerging economy enterprises (EEEs) as the conceptual setting. We conclude with a future research agenda to prepare the ground for research on compositional capabilities within the composition-based view of the firm.

scholarly journals An overview of systematic literature reviews in social media marketing

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 725-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Rowley ◽  
Brendan James Keegan
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Critical Comment ◽  
Social Media Marketing ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Making Sense ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
Literature Reviews

Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) adopt a specified and transparent approach in order to scope the literature in a field or sub-field. However, there has been little critical comment on their purpose and processes in practice. By undertaking an overview of SLRs in the field of social media (SM) marketing, this article undertakes a critical evaluation of the SLR purposes and processes in a set of recent SLRs and presents a future research agenda for social media marketing. The overview shows that the purposes of SLRs include the following: making sense (of research in a field), developing a concept matrix/taxonomy and supporting research and practice. On SLR processes, while there is some consensus on the stages of the process, there is considerable variation in how these processes are executed. This article offers a resource to inform practice and acts as a platform for further critical debate regarding the nature and value of SLRs.

Upsides to Dark and Downsides to Bright Personality: A Multidomain Review and Future Research Agenda

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mickey B. Smith ◽  
Aaron D. Hill ◽  
J. Craig Wallace ◽  
Tessa Recendes ◽  
Timothy A. Judge
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Strategic Management ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Recent Trend ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
Growing Body

It has become common practice to refer to personality traits as being either bright or dark, and a wealth of research has provided support for the effects of both bright traits and dark traits in organizations. This research has largely focused on explaining the downside of dark traits and the upside of bright traits. However, a recent trend has emerged in which scholars are challenging the long-standing convention that bright traits are always beneficial and dark traits are always detrimental. Instead, novel research has begun to explore the potential upside of dark traits and downside of bright traits. In this review, we adopt a multidomain perspective—integrating work from organizational behavior, human resources, strategic management, and entrepreneurship—to highlight this growing body of research. Specifically, we focus on the work advancing our understanding of the complexity of personality, such as identifying situations in which dark traits may be advantageous or beneficial and detecting curvilinear effects that suggest too much of a bright trait may be disadvantageous. Furthermore, we provide a brief discussion on special considerations for the measurement of both bright and dark traits and close with a series of avenues for future research.

scholarly journals The distinctiveness of family-firm intangibles: A review and suggestions for future research

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolien Huybrechts ◽  
Wim Voordeckers ◽  
Nadine Lybaert ◽  
Sigrid Vandemaele
Keyword(s):  
Human Capital ◽  
Organizational Culture ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Resource Based View ◽  
Intangible Resources ◽  
Future Research Agenda

AbstractWe review the theoretical and empirical literature on the resource-based view in the context of family businesses using a framework of intangible resources. This approach allows us to structure the present research on value-adding resources in family firms into four clearly distinct groups – organizational culture, reputation, human capital and networks – and provides us with the opportunity to examine the interactions of these intangible resources. We use these relationships to offer a future research agenda that is focused on the creation of competitive advantage through the combination and recombination of these resources.

scholarly journals The distinctiveness of family-firm intangibles: A review and suggestions for future research

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolien Huybrechts ◽  
Wim Voordeckers ◽  
Nadine Lybaert ◽  
Sigrid Vandemaele
Keyword(s):  
Human Capital ◽  
Organizational Culture ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Resource Based View ◽  
Intangible Resources ◽  
Future Research Agenda

AbstractWe review the theoretical and empirical literature on the resource-based view in the context of family businesses using a framework of intangible resources. This approach allows us to structure the present research on value-adding resources in family firms into four clearly distinct groups – organizational culture, reputation, human capital and networks – and provides us with the opportunity to examine the interactions of these intangible resources. We use these relationships to offer a future research agenda that is focused on the creation of competitive advantage through the combination and recombination of these resources.

scholarly journals Integrating Conflict: A Proposed Framework for the Interdisciplinary Study of Workplace Conflict and Its Management

ILR Review ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-311
Author(s):  
Ariel Avgar
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Workplace Conflict ◽  
Disciplinary Boundaries ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
Interdisciplinary Study ◽  
Conflict Research

This article contributes to existing conflict research by proposing a theoretical framework capable of integrating findings and insights across distinct disciplines. The author utilizes the Kochan, Katz, and McKersie (1986) three-tiered industrial relations framework and demonstrates its unique capacity to situate and organize what we know about conflict and to highlight areas that have been neglected as a result of disciplinary fragmentation. The article reviews key themes, findings, and insights advanced by organizational behavior, industrial relations, and legal scholars. The author identifies the barriers associated with disciplinary boundaries and the costs these have had in terms of our current understanding of conflict in organizations. This review also examines potential areas of integration in the study of conflict and their implications for existing scholarship. Finally, the author proposes theoretical linkages that stem from the integration of conflict insights across disciplines, which serve as the basis for a future research agenda.

The Limits of Ego Depletion

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 292-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Wenzel ◽  
Marina Lind ◽  
Zarah Rowland ◽  
Daniela Zahn ◽  
Thomas Kubiak
Keyword(s):  
Research Agenda ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Interindividual Variability ◽  
Ego Depletion ◽  
Crossover Design ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
Depletion Effect ◽  
Within Subjects

Abstract. Evidence on the existence of the ego depletion phenomena as well as the size of the effects and potential moderators and mediators are ambiguous. Building on a crossover design that enables superior statistical power within a single study, we investigated the robustness of the ego depletion effect between and within subjects and moderating and mediating influences of the ego depletion manipulation checks. Our results, based on a sample of 187 participants, demonstrated that (a) the between- and within-subject ego depletion effects only had negligible effect sizes and that there was (b) large interindividual variability that (c) could not be explained by differences in ego depletion manipulation checks. We discuss the implications of these results and outline a future research agenda.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document