scholarly journals Moving Toward Implementation of Universal Mental Health Screening by Examining Attitudes Toward School-Based Practices

2020 ◽  
pp. 019874292098259
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Moore ◽  
Erin Dowdy ◽  
Tameisha Hinton ◽  
Christine DiStefano ◽  
Fred W. Greer

Universal mental health screening is a proactive approach to identify students who may benefit from prevention or early intervention services. Despite known benefits, few schools are engaging in screening efforts and it is critical to examine factors that may impede or enhance implementation. Following implementation of a universal screening program across five preschools and elementary schools, this study investigated the attitudes of teachers ( N = 40) and parents ( N = 330) and found strong agreement among stakeholders about the acceptability and appropriateness of universal mental health screening. Teachers and parents expressed less willingness to regularly complete screening forms, yet teachers reported that the Behavior Assessment System for Children–Third Edition: Behavioral Emotional Screening System was a usable screening tool. Implications and future directions to enhance implementation efforts are discussed.

Author(s):  
John R. Burns ◽  
Ronald M. Rapee

Abstract In light of concerning evidence that many young people with mental disorders are not receiving appropriate mental health intervention, school-based mental health screening has been advocated as one way to improve identification of at-risk youth. Despite having much promise, universal screening in schools remains a relatively uncommon practice internationally. Various barriers that deter school psychologists and counsellors from screening have been identified, including lack of resourcing to implement screening, lack of knowledge about the mechanics of how to carry out a screening program, and concern about how to manage the anticipated increased workload generated by following up identified students. In this practice-based paper we discuss a four-stage process that guides school psychologists and counsellors in the establishment of a school-based screening program, with specific reference to overcoming perceived barriers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1078-1084
Author(s):  
Linda Herbert ◽  
Steven Hardy

We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of brief mental health screening during pediatric subspecialty clinic visits. Patients (8-17 years) and parents (of patients 5-17 years) in pediatric allergy, immunology, and hematology clinics completed the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pediatric Profile. Medical providers reviewed results and interpretations to guide discussion of mental health during visits. Almost all providers (96%) reported discussing mental health during visits but fewer parents (60%) said this discussion occurred. All parents who reported that mental health discussions occurred liked that this happened. Some parents (25%) who said no mental health discussion occurred wished it had. Most parents strongly agreed that screening completion was easy and appropriate. Most providers (79%) believed the screening was useful and 87% reported using screening results to guide discussion. Brief electronic mental health screening in pediatric subspecialty clinics is feasible, useful in guiding discussion, and viewed favorably by providers and parents of children with chronic illnesses.


2004 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinka Chatterji ◽  
Christine M. Caffray ◽  
Maura Crowe ◽  
Linda Freeman ◽  
Peter Jensen

Author(s):  
Craig L. Katz ◽  
Rebecca P. Smith ◽  
Robin Herbert ◽  
Steven M. Levin ◽  
Raz Gross ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Blackmore ◽  
Jacqueline A Boyle ◽  
Kylie M Gray ◽  
Suzanne Willey ◽  
Nicole Highet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pregnancy is a time of increased risk for developing or re-experiencing mental illness. Perinatal mental health screening for all women is recommended in many national guidelines but a number of systems-level and individual barriers often hinder policy implementation. These barriers result in missed opportunities for detection and early intervention, and are likely to be experienced disproportionately by women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, including women of refugee backgrounds. The objectives of this study were to develop a theory-informed, evidence-based guide for introducing and integrating perinatal mental health screening across health settings; and to synthesise the learnings from an implementation initiative and multi-sectoral partnership between the Centre of Perinatal Excellence (COPE), and a university-based research centre. COPE is a peak body in perinatal mental health and Non-Governmental Organization commissioned to update the Australian national perinatal mental health guidelines, train health professionals and rollout innovative digital screening across healthcare settings. Methods: In this case study, barriers to implementation were prospectively identified and strategies to overcome them were developed. A pilot perinatal screening program with a strong health equity focus was implemented and evaluated at a large public maternity service delivering care to a culturally diverse population of women in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, including women of refugee background. Strategies identified pre-implementation and post-evaluation were mapped to theoretical frameworks. An implementation guide was developed to support future policy, planning and decision-making by healthcare organisations. Results: Using a behavioural change framework (COM-B), the key barriers, processes, and outcomes are described for a real-world example designed to maximise accessibility, feasibility, and acceptability. A program logic model was developed to demonstrate the relationships of the inputs, which included stakeholder consultation, resource development, and a digital screening platform, with the outcomes of the program. A seven-stage implementation guide is presented for use in a range of healthcare settings. Conclusions: These findings describe an equity-informed, evidence-based approach that can be used by healthcare organisations to address common systems and individual level barriers to implement perinatal mental health screening guidelines.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrian Brooks ◽  
Bathusi Phetogo ◽  
Makhetha Monyane-Pheko ◽  
Onkemetse Phoi ◽  
Ontibile Tshume ◽  
...  

<p><b><u>Introduction</u></b>: Youth living with HIV (YLWH) experience higher rates of mental illness than their peers. Holistic care for YLWH may involve adopting mental health screening programs into comprehensive HIV care to help identify and address mental health concerns in young people. We explored various contexts, procedures, and safety measures throughout the integration and maintenance of a mental health screening program for adolescents attending an HIV referral clinic in Gaborone, Botswana. <b><u>Methods:</u></b> Implementation goals included a safety goal of 100% appropriate referral rate for emergency cases, and a screening goal of 70% of the approximately 1100 adolescent and young adults who were clients of the clinic at least once in the one year review period. Frequent meetings with the behavioral health team and relevant clinic staff were conducted to determine when, where and how to screen the clients. Referral procedures and an emergency protocol for certain “red flag” behaviors was developed to facilitate a warm handing off to trained mental health professionals along with a backup for non-mental health clinicians to assist in the absence of the PSS team. Every other week severe score case reports were produced by the screening team to prevent loss to follow up of suicidal ideation, hallucination or very high scores. Mild to moderate cases were referred to clinicians trained in brief intervention therapy. <b><u>Results:</u></b> Of the 846 clients screened, 191 (19.2%) had severe scores. Eight (4.1%) of these 191 severe case scores were either not immediately reported, or were inappropriately referred. Two of those eight had suicidal ideation and were not immediately referred but were appropriately followed up after being identified during bimonthly implementation team meetings. Identifying a specific trained person tasked with facilitating the screening was found to be most helpful. As was training the clinicians in methods to respond to mild to moderate results, particularly during unavailability of PSS team members. A clear and detailed protocol for severe cases was also noted as a key element in keeping the screening program safe. <b><u>Conclusions:</u></b> Establishing a universal screening program in an LMIC is possible with the consideration of various contextual factors.<u></u></p>


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Lubit ◽  
Wendy Kuppenheimer ◽  
Mary Courtney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document