Aversives in Special Education Programs for Behaviorally Disordered Students: A Debate

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Zabel ◽  
Reece Peterson ◽  
Robert Zabel ◽  
Ellen McGinnis ◽  
Deborah Scott-Miller ◽  
...  
1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Neel ◽  
Nancy Meadows ◽  
Phyllis Levine ◽  
Eugene B. Edgar

Recently there have been several follow-up studies of students who have exited special education programs (Hasazi, Gordon, & Roe, 1985; Mithaug, Horiuchi, & Fanning, 1985). These studies raise an interesting question: How well have special education programs prepared the youth they were designed to serve? This study reviews findings concerning the postschool adjustment of 160 students who were labeled behaviorally disordered at graduation from public school in the state of Washington between 1978 and 1986.


1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Maheady ◽  
Diane M. Sainato

The purpose of the present investigation was to provide information regarding the social interaction patterns of behaviorally disordered students in self-contained special education programs. The highest and lowest sociometrically rated students in each of three elementary, self-contained special education programs were observed during free play time for 5 minutes each day over a 4-week period. The quantity (frequency), quality (positive or negative), and reciprocal nature of their social interactions with classroom peers were recorded. Results of this investigation indicate that, for the most part, social interactions among behaviorally disordered youngsters were both positive and reciprocal in nature. In addition, no discernible differences were noted between the target-initiated social behavior of high and low status students. However, specific differences were found in peer social behavior that was directed toward the target subjects. High status students were the recipients of (a) higher rates of peer initiations, (b) greater percentages of positive social initiations, and (c) fewer negative social contacts. Low status children, on the other hand, encountered fewer peer-initiated contacts, and of these, a greater percentage were negative in nature. Implications for future research are discussed.


1984 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence W. Marrs

The bandwagon has finally reached rural America. This article discusses important considerations for those who would board this bandwagon carrying baggage which includes preconceived ideas about using traditional special education programs to prepare special educators for rural areas. Competencies and curriculum elements which should be included in preservice programs are discussed.


1970 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Cruickshank ◽  
Herbert C. Quay

The growing concern about planning and providing effective physical facilities for special education programs is presented. Particular emphasis is focused on the inadequacy of decisions made by special educators and architects regarding the nature of the physical environment in the absence of empirically obtained evidence. Supporting the need for such research, some of the difficulties encountered—the isolation of variables, management techniques, and design—are discussed.


1964 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony C. Milazzo ◽  
Kenneth R. Blessing

The presentation of a point of view on the training of administrators of special education, a survey of current practices involved in such training, and a statement of goals adopted by NASDSE in this area. It is expected that this presentation will stimulate further needed discussion by those concerned with quality leadership in special education.


1988 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine M. Lambert

This article summarizes the contemporary major authoritative sources relevant to decisions about eligibility for an appropriate placement of children in special education programs. These sources reflect the work of three major panels commissioned by the National Academy of Science to undertake an analysis of the issues and research evidence regarding ability testing and the testing of handicapped people.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document