Echocardiographic predictors of exercise induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe mitral regurgitation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912098754
Author(s):  
Rūta Žvirblytė ◽  
Aistė Montvilaitė ◽  
Eglė Tamulėnaitė ◽  
Agnė Saniukaitė ◽  
Eglė Ereminienė ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Peak Stress ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Exercise Induced ◽  
Lv Diastolic Function

Background: The significant role of mitral regurgitation (MR) in development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been proved in previous studies. Experts suggest systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) ⩾60 mmHg during exercise as a significant threshold of negative prognostic value in patients with MR. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes of SPAP and to ascertain the determinants of exercise induced pulmonary hypertension (EIPH) in patients with asymptomatic primary MR. Methods: We performed a prospective study that included 50 patients with asymptomatic primary moderate to severe MR with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF ⩾60%) at rest. They were divided into two groups according to the presence (PH group; n = 13) or absence (non-PH group; n = 37) of EIPH. Rest and stress (bicycle ergometry) echocardiography and speckle-tracking offline analysis were performed. Results: An increment of SPAP from rest to peak stress was higher in PH group ( p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that MR effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA; p = 0.008) and regurgitant volume (RVol; p = 0.006) contributed significantly to SPAP at rest. Higher increment of MR EROA during stress and worse parameters of LV diastolic function at rest (E, A, E/e’) correlated significantly with higher SPAP during peak stress and they had a major role in predicting EIPH according to univariate logistic regression analysis. In ROC analysis SPAP >33.1 mmHg at rest could predict EIPH with 84.6% sensitivity and 87.1% specificity (95%CI 0.849–1.000; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Parameters of MR severity (EROA and RVol) were significant determinants of SPAP at rest, while the increment of MR EROA during stress and parameters of resting LV diastolic function were the best predictors of significant EIPH.

scholarly journals Forward Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as a Predictor of Postoperative Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3013
Author(s):  
Juyoun Kim ◽  
Jae-Sik Nam ◽  
Youngdo Kim ◽  
Ji-Hyun Chin ◽  
In-Cheol Choi
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Normal Lvef

Background: Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) can occur immediately after mitral valve repair (MVr) for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) in some patients with normal preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study investigated whether forward LVEF, calculated as left ventricular outflow tract stroke volume divided by left ventricular end-diastolic volume, could predict LVD immediately after MVr in patients with DMR and normal LVEF. Methods: Echocardiographic and clinical data were retrospectively evaluated in 234 patients with DMR ≥ moderate and preoperative LVEF ≥ 60%. LVD and non-LVD were defined as LVEF < 50% and ≥50%, respectively, as measured by echocardiography after MVr and before discharge. Results: Of the 234 patients, 52 (22.2%) developed LVD at median three days (interquartile range: 3–4 days). Preoperative forward LVEF in the LVD and non-LVD groups were 24.0% (18.9–29.5%) and 33.2% (26.4–39.4%), respectively (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that forward LVEF was predictive of LVD, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.73–0.86), and an optimal cut-off was 31.8% (sensitivity: 88.5%, specificity: 58.2%, positive predictive value: 37.7%, and negative predictive value: 94.6%). Preoperative forward LVEF significantly correlated with preoperative mitral regurgitant volume (correlation coefficient [CC] = −0.86, p < 0.001) and regurgitant fraction (CC = −0.98, p < 0.001), but not with preoperative LVEF (CC = 0.112, p = 0.088). Conclusion: Preoperative forward LVEF could be useful in predicting postoperative LVD immediately after MVr in patients with DMR and normal LVEF, with an optimal cut-off of 31.8%.

P3437Impact of epicardial adipose tissue on global longitudinal strain: a study in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Maimaituxun ◽  
K.E.N.Y.A Kusunose ◽  
D.A.I.J.U Fukuda ◽  
S Yagi ◽  
Y Torii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Epicardial Adipose Tissue ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Normal Left Ventricular

Abstract Background Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) locates anatomically and functionally contiguous to the myocardium and coronary arteries. It has been suggested that EAT accumulation is associated with cardiac remodeling and impaired cardiac performance. However, its role in left ventricular (LV) wall strain remains unclear. Purpose In this study, we aimed to clarify: whether EAT accumulation is related to global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (CS) and radial strain (RS); and if so, in which extent or by which amount of EAT are required to deteriorate these strain. Methods Total 180 patients who had no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on conventional echocardiography were recruited. Cardiac CT was used to quantify EAT volume (EATV) and echocardiographic speckle tracking was used to measure the GLS, CS and RS. EATV index (EATV/Body surface area) was determined as: EAT volume, the sum of the EAT area from the base to the apex of the heart (cm3)/body surface area (m2). Adipose tissue was determined as the density range between −190 and −30 Hounsfield unit. According to the median value (68 cm3/m2), patients were divided into lower and higher EATV index two groups. Results In higher EATV index group (95±19 cm3/m2), mean age, body mass index (BMI), prevalence of hyperlipidemia and prevalence of CAD were larger than in lower EATV index group (48±14 cm3/m2). Male gender, hypertension, diabetes, smoking and LV mass index were comparable between two groups. Patients in higher EATV index had lower GLS than those in lower EATV index (−19.4±1.2% vs. −18.8±1.3%, p=0.002). However, there were no significant difference between two groups regarding to the CS and RS. Linear regression analysis showed that there was strong correlation between EATV index and GLS (R=0.216, p=0.004); whereas, both RS and CS were strongly associated with the interventricular septum thickness (RS: R=0.248, p=0.003; CS: R= −0.192, p=0.023) and relative wall thickness (RS: R=0.178, p=0.036; CS: R= −0.184, p=0.030) but not with EATV; on multiple regression analysis, EATV was a predictor of GLS independent of age, male gender, BMI, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and CAD (Adjusted R2=0.238, p<0.001). Conclusion EATV is independently associated with GLS despite the preserved LVEF and lacking of obstructive CAD, and may play a significant role in estimating impaired longitudinal LV performance.

scholarly journals 559 An analysis of myocardial efficiency in patients with severe asymptomatic mitral regurgitation

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Cetin Guvenc ◽  
E Arugaslan ◽  
T S Guvenc ◽  
F Ozpamuk Karadeniz ◽  
H Kasikcioglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Severe Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
External Work ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Myocardial Efficiency

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None declared. Background and Aims It is difficult to determine left ventricular systolic performance in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) since left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) could be preserved until the end stages of the disease. Myocardial efficiency describes the amount of external work (EW) done by the left ventricle per unit of oxygen consumed (mVO2). In the present study, we aimed to investigate MEf in patients with asymptomatic severe MR using a novel echocardiographic method. Methods: A total of 27 patients with severe asymptomatic MR and 26 healthy volunteers were included in this cross-sectional study. EW was measured using stroke volume and blood pressure, while mVO2 was estimated using double product and LV mass. Results: There were no differences between the groups with regards to EF (66%±5% vs. 69%±7%), while MEf was significantly reduced in patients with severe MR (25%±11% vs. 44%±12%, p &lt; 0.001) (Table 1). This difference was maintained even after adjustment for age, gender and body surface area (adjusted :0.44, 95%CI: 0.39–0.49 for controls and adjusted :0.24, 95%CI: 0.19–0.29 for patients with severe MR). Further analysis showed that this reduction was due to an increase in total mVO2 in the severe MR group (Figure 1). Conclusions: Myocardial efficiency was significantly lower in patients with asymptomatic severe MR and preserved EF. Table 1 Parameter Control Group (n = 26) Severe Mitral Regurgitation (n = 27) P Value Age (y) 36.5 ± 8.9 41.3 ± 14.2 0.23 Gender (%Male) 9 (35%) 10 (37%) 1.0 BSA (m2) 1.82 ± 0.20 1.76 ± 0.18 0.64 LV End-Diastolic Volume (ml) 83.13 ± 18.88 121.91 ± 37.63 &lt;0.001 LV End-Systolic Volume (ml) 28.07 ± 9.57 45.30 ± 17.42 &lt;0.001 Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%) 0.69 ± 0.07 0.66 ± 0.05 0.29 Systolic Mitral Velocity (cm/s) 7.88 ± 1.14 8.07 ± 1.81 0.66 Stroke Work (j) 1.14 ± 0.21 1.15 ± 0.36 0.91 Minute External Work (j) 65.96 ± 14.71 70.17 ± 23.15 0.85 mVO2 (ml.min-1.100g-1) 6.79 ± 1.93 9.48 ± 4.71 0.02 Total mVO2 (j) 166.58 ± 77.14 346.46 ± 202.71 &lt;0.001 Myocardial Efficiency (%) 44 ± 12 25 ± 11 &lt;0.001 Table 1. Demographic, anthropometric, echocardiographic and mechanoenergetic data for study groups. BSA, body surface area; LV, left ventricle; mVO2, myocardial oxygen consumption. Abstract 559 Figure 1

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document