scholarly journals Early home-supported discharge for patients with stroke in Portugal: a randomised controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvina Santana ◽  
José Rente ◽  
Conceição Neves ◽  
Patrícia Redondo ◽  
Nina Szczygiel ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate an early home-supported discharge service for stroke patients. Design: We carried out a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial (allocation ratio of 1:1) with patients assigned to either an early home-supported discharge service or usual care. Setting: The study was undertaken in Aveiro, Portugal, between April 2009 and April 2013. Subjects: We included stroke patients aged 25–85 years admitted to the stroke unit with an initial Functional Independence Measure of up to 100, who gave informed consent. Interventions: Patients in the early home-supported discharge group began their rehabilitation intervention in the stroke unit and the early home-supported discharge team worked with them at home for a maximum of one month. Patients in the control group received usual services. Main measures: The primary outcome measure was the Functional Independence Measure at six months after stroke. Results: We randomised 190 patients of whom 34 were lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences (p > 0.5) in the average scores of Functional Independence Measure between the early home-supported discharge (69 ±22; mean ±SD) and the control groups (71 ±17) measured at baseline; and between the early home-supported discharge (107 ±20) and the control groups (107 ±25) measured at six months. The number of individuals with a low Functional Independence Measure score (<60) in the early home-supported discharge group compared with the control group was higher at admission (34/95 vs. 26/95) and lower at follow-up (2/74 vs. 5/78). Conclusions: It was feasible to implement early home-supported discharge procedures in a Southern European setting, but we have not shown convincing differences in disability at six months.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jin-Yang Zhuang ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Bei-Bei Shu ◽  
Dan Chen ◽  
Jie Jia

Bimanual cooperation plays a vital role in functions of the upper extremity and daily activities. Based on the principle of bilateral movement, mirror therapy could provide bimanual cooperation training. However, conventional mirror therapy could not achieve the isolation of the mirror. A novel paradigm mirror therapy called associated mirror therapy (AMT) was proposed to achieve bimanual cooperation task-based mirror visual feedback isolating from the mirror. The study was aimed at exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of AMT on stroke patients. We conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Thirty-six eligible patients were equally assigned into the experimental group (EG) receiving AMT and the control group (CG) receiving bimanual training without mirroring for five days/week, lasting four weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb subscale (FMA-UL) for upper extremity motor impairment was used as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the Box and Block Test (BBT) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for motor and daily function. All patients participated in trials throughout without adverse events or side effects. The scores of FMA-UL and FIM improved significantly in both groups following the intervention. Compared to CG, the scores of FMA-UL and FIM were improved more significantly in EG after the intervention. The BBT scores were improved significantly for EG following the intervention, but no differences were found in the BBT scores of CG after the intervention. However, no differences in BBT scores were observed between the two groups. In summary, our study suggested that AMT was a feasible and practical approach to enhance the motor recovery of paretic arms and daily function in stroke patients. Furthermore, AMT may improve manual dexterity for poststroke rehabilitation.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 983-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
H van Ettekoven ◽  
C Lucas

We conducted a multicentre, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. The treatment period was 6 weeks with follow-up assessment immediately thereafter and after 6 months. The objective was to determine the effectiveness of a craniocervical training programme combined with physiotherapy for tension-type headache. Eighty-one participants meeting the diagnostic criteria for tension-type headache were randomly assigned to an exercise group (physiotherapy and an additional craniocervical training programme) and a control group (physiotherapy alone). The primary outcome measure was headache frequency. Secondary outcomes included headache intensity and duration, Quality of Life (SF-36) and the Multidimensional Headache Locus of Control scale (MHLC). At 6 months' follow-up, the craniocervical training group showed significantly reduced headache frequency, intensity and duration ( P < 0.001 for all). Effect sizes were large and clinically relevant. Loss to follow-up amounted to 3.7±. Physiotherapy including craniocervical training reduces symptoms of tension-type headache significantly over a prolonged time frame.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-67
Author(s):  
S.Airiza Ahmad ◽  
Iman Supandiman ◽  
Soemarmo Markam ◽  
Riwanti Estiasari ◽  
Graeme Hankey

Background: At present, the management of stroke focuses not only on the acute stage of saving the penumbra but also on the secondary prevention of managing the potential sequel following stroke, preventing the occurrence of another attack, and improving the quality of life. Continuous role of caregivers in supporting stroke survivor after passing the acute phase is therefore invaluable. Caregiver education program (CEP) was routinely used as a part of discharge plan on acute stroke patients in stroke unit in Indonesia. This study aims to evaluate the effect of CEP as one of stroke rehabilitation modalities using a historical data that still correlated to the practice in stroke unit nowadays. Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed on 172 subjects of first-ever stroke with no other comorbidities and not having invasive treatment on the recruitment time. The subjects were randomly allocated into two groups: a group receiving CEP (n=88) as the experiment group and a control group (n=84). A four-session CEP, held since the second week of admission by interactive discussion using overhead projector and poster, was performed by a neurologist to the caregiver member of experiment group stroke survivor. The outcome of functional independence and mortality on the third month post-onset was assessed using Barthel activity daily living (ADL) index and the mortality report, respectively. Results: No statistical difference was found on the baseline of the two groups. CEP significantly increased the functional independence (RR=1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.63) of stroke survivor. Despite the insignificant effect on three-month survival, the group receiving CEP had less mortality rate over time. Conclusion: Caregiver education program had a positive outcome on the patient’s functional independence. Thus, it improves the quality of life.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie Paletz ◽  
Pamela Roberts ◽  
Harriet Aronow ◽  
Sonia Guerra ◽  
Tingjian Yan

Introduction: Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability and affects 795,000 people in the U.S. each year. This study was conducted to enhance knowledge of outcomes during recovery and the options for participating in rehabilitation and preventive care during patients’ transitions to the community. Comprehensive Stroke Certification charges hospitals with the task of expanding knowledge of functional and quality of life outcomes for all stroke patients through the continuum examining effects of stroke severity, functional impairment, and patient characteristics on discharge destinations, functional independence, and quality of life after discharge. Methods: Retrospective analysis of an acute stroke quality improvement database which includes measures collected by MedTel Outcomes LLC on all stroke patients one month after discharge. Included, is the Functional Independence Measure and standardized quality of life and participation measures. In the database are standardized measures from the medical record such stroke type, Modified Rankin score, and acute functional independence measure score for 719 patients with a 30-day follow-up phone assessment for functional and quality of life measures from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. Preliminary Findings: Over 75% of patients had hemiparesis, & over 90% survived 30-days post discharge and were living in the community. At follow-up, mostwere independent in self-care, and half were independent in mobility excluding stairs. Those with right brain involvement had a complicated, slower recovery. Those with left brain involvement,had lower functional scores and a higher percentage of them were not living in the community, rather, living in institutions. Conclusions: All patients experiencing a stroke should have evidence-based information on their options & what to expect during their recovery during their transitions into the community. The data base is useful as a source of outcome data for comparative effectiveness and to build a regional collaborative outcomes database for Comparative Effectiveness Research and quality benchmarking. Findings can be used to understand the functional trajectory of recovery based on severity of stroke and other factors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torunn Askim ◽  
Birgitta Langhammer ◽  
Hege Ihle-Hansen ◽  
Jon Magnussen ◽  
Torgeir Engstad ◽  
...  

Background. There are no evidence-based strategies that have been shown to be superior in maintaining motor function for months to years after the stroke. The LAST study therefore intends to assess the effect of a long-term follow-up program for stroke patients compared to standard care on function, disability and health.Design. This is a prospective, multi-site randomised controlled trial, with blinded assessment 18 months after inclusion. A total of 390 patients will be recruited and randomised to a control group, receiving usual care, or to an intervention group 10 to 16 weeks after onset of stroke. Patients will be stratified according to stroke severity, age above 80, and recruitment site. The intervention group will receive monthly coaching on physical activity by a physiotherapist for 18 consecutive months after inclusion.Outcomes. The primary outcome is motor function (Motor Assessment Scale) 18 months after inclusion. Secondary outcomes are: dependency, balance, endurance, health-related quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression, cognitive function, burden on caregivers, and health costs. Adverse events and compliance to the intervention will be registered consecutively during follow-up.


EP Europace ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Kenny

Abstract SAFE PACE is a multicentre randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of dual-chamber pacing in older patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity and recurrent un-explained falls. Patients are eligible if they have had two or more unexplained falls (± up to one syncope) and if they have a cardio-inhibitory response (>3 s asystole) to carotid sinus massage. Patients will be randomized to receive either a Medtronic Kappa 700(Europe)/Kappa 400(North America) pacemaker or an implantable loop recorder (ILR)(control group). Patients will be required to complete weekly fall diaries. The primary outcome measure is the number of patients who fall in the 24-month follow-up period. Recruitment began in October 1998 and continues for 12 months; the follow-up is for 24 months.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (B) ◽  
pp. 470-479
Author(s):  
Maryam Hannah Daud ◽  
Anis Safura Ramli ◽  
Suraya Abdul-Razak ◽  
Jamaiyah Haniff ◽  
Tg Mohd Ikhwan Tg Abu Bakar Sidik ◽  
...  

AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the EMPOWER- participatory action research (PAR) intervention, a multifaceted strategy based on the chronic care model (CCM) on primary care providers (PCP)’ adherence to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) clinical practice guideline (CPG) in the Malaysian primary care setting. METHODS: This was a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial –PAR conducted in ten public primary care clinics in Malaysia. Five clinics were randomly selected to provide the EMPOWER-PAR intervention for 1 year and another five clinics continued with usual care. The outcome measure was the absolute change in the proportion of PCP’s adherence to T2DM CPG captured using the “Indicators of Care Pro forma,” based on the recommendation by the Malaysian CPG on the Management of T2DM. Data were collected from the patients’ medical records, at baseline and at 1-year follow-up; and were analyzed using mixed method model. RESULTS: A total of 888 patients were recruited at baseline; 471 were in the intervention and 417 were in the control group. There was no significant demographic difference between the two groups at baseline except for ethnicity. At 1-year, 455 (96.6%) and 406 (97.3%) patients in the intervention and control groups completed the study, respectively. There were significant improvements in the absolute change in the proportion of PCPs’ adherence to T2DM CPG in the intervention group compared to the control group at 1-year follow-up in several indicators of care. These included the recording of BMI (0.6% vs. −1.8%, p<0.001); performing foot examination (2.4% vs. 0.6%, p<0.001); performing funduscopy/fundus photography (1.5% vs. 0.3%, p<0.001); monitoring renal profile (0.9% vs. −0.6%, p=0.001); measuring urine protein (1.2% vs. 0.6%, p<0.001), and giving lifestyle modification and self-management advice (1.2% vs. −0.3%, p<0.001) in the intervention versus control groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The EMPOWER-PAR intervention has been proven to be effective in improving the PCPs’ adherence to T2DM CPG in several indicators of care. Findings from this study provided objective evidence of the effectiveness of multifaceted intervention based on the CCM in the Malaysian public primary care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01545401. Date of registration: 1st March 2012.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza davoudi ◽  
Zahra allame ◽  
Aliakbar Foroughi ◽  
Amir Abbas taheri

Abstract Purpose: This study has investigated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of DBT for Marijuana cessation and craving reduction as a pilot RCT.Methods: Sixty-one participants were randomly assigned to one of the DBT or psycho-education as active control-group with two-month follow-up. Patients completed measures at pre-interventions, post-interventions, and a two-month follow-up.Results: feasibility in DBT is significantly higher than the control group. In the DBT group 29/30 (96% retention) and in control group 24/31 (77% retention) completed all sessions (χ2= 4.95, p = 0.02). Moreover, 29/30 (96%) in the DBT group and 20/31 (64.5%) in the control group completed the two-month follow-up (χ2= 9.97, p = 0.002). For the acceptability of the intervention, results showed 16.57 (agree) in DBT and 9.6 (neither agree nor disagree) in control groups for p < 0.05. For appropriateness, results showed 17.03 (completely agree) in DBT and 10.7 (neither agree nor disagree) in control-groups for p < 0.05. for craving, results confirmed that there is no significant difference between groups (F = 3.52, p > 0.05); however, in “emotionality,” subscale DBT showed a significant reduction rather than the control group (F = 19.94, p < 0.05). For cessation rates, DBT was compared with the control group at the posttest (46% vs. 16%) and follow-up (40% vs. 9.5%), and results proved higher effectiveness in the DBT group for p < 0.05. Furthermore, among those who have lapsed, participation in the DBT group had fewer days than consume for p <0.05.Conclusions: DBT shows feasibility, acceptability, and promise in improving cessation rate in Marijuana use disorder and warrants further investigations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Mauro Mancuso ◽  
Serena Di Tondo ◽  
Enza Costantini ◽  
Alessio Damora ◽  
Patrizio Sale ◽  
...  

Due to the complexity of the interventions for upper limb recovery, at the moment there is a lack of evidence regarding innovative and effective rehabilitative interventions. Action Observation Training (AOT) constitutes a promising rehabilitative method to improve upper limb motor recovery in stroke patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of AOT, both in upper limb recovery and in functional outcomes when compared to patients treated with task oriented training (TOT). Both treatments were added to traditional rehabilitative treatment. Thirty-two acute stroke patients at 15.6 days (±8.3) from onset, with moderate to severe upper limb impairment at baseline following their first-ever stroke, were enrolled and randomized into two groups: 16 in the experimental group (EG) and 16 in the control group (CG). The EG underwent 30 min sessions of AOT, and the CG underwent 30 min sessions of TOT. All participants received 20 sessions of treatment for four consecutive weeks (five days/week). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Box and Block Test (BBT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were administered at baseline (T0) and at the end of treatment (T1). No statistical differences were found at T0 for inclusion criteria between the CG and EG, whereas both groups improved significantly at T1. After the treatment period, the rehabilitative gain was greater in the EG compared to the CG for FMA-UE and FIM (all p < 0.05). Our results suggest that AOT can contribute to increased motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with moderate to severe upper limb impairment in the early phase after stroke. The improvements presented in this article, together with the lack of adverse events, confirm that the use of AOT should be broadened out to larger pools of subacute stroke patients.


10.2196/18047 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. e18047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Lindqvist ◽  
Jakob Mechler ◽  
Per Carlbring ◽  
Peter Lilliengren ◽  
Fredrik Falkenström ◽  
...  

Background Adolescent depression is one of the largest health issues in the world and there is a pressing need for effective and accessible treatments. Objective This trial examines whether affect-focused internet-based psychodynamic therapy (IPDT) with therapist support is more effective than an internet-based supportive control condition on reducing depression in adolescents. Methods The trial included 76 adolescents (61/76, 80% female; mean age 16.6 years), self-referred via an open access website and fulfilling criteria for major depressive disorder. Adolescents were randomized to 8 weeks of IPDT (38/76, 50%) or supportive control (38/76, 50%). The primary outcome was self-reported depressive symptoms, measured with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology for Adolescents (QIDS-A17-SR). Secondary outcomes were anxiety severity, emotion regulation, self-compassion, and an additional depression measure. Assessments were made at baseline, postassessment, and at 6 months follow-up, in addition to weekly assessments of the primary outcome measure as well as emotion regulation during treatment. Results IPDT was significantly more effective than the control condition in reducing depression (d=0.82, P=.01), the result of which was corroborated by the second depression measure (d=0.80, P<.001). IPDT was also significantly more effective in reducing anxiety (d=0.78, P<.001) and increasing emotion regulation (d=0.97, P<.001) and self-compassion (d=0.65, P=.003). Significantly more patients in the IPDT group compared to the control group met criteria for response (56% vs 21%, respectively) and remission (35% vs 8%, respectively). Results on depression and anxiety symptoms were stable at 6 months follow-up. On average, participants completed 5.8 (SD 2.4) of the 8 modules. Conclusions IPDT may be an effective intervention to reduce adolescent depression. Further research is needed, including comparisons with other treatments. Trial Registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 16206254; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16206254


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document