scholarly journals Delayed recanalization in acute ischemic stroke patients: Late is better than never?

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 2536-2538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinwei Pang ◽  
John H Zhang ◽  
Yong Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Brain Tissue ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Narrow Therapeutic Window ◽  
Better Than

Successful recanalization of the occluded vessel as early as possible has been widely accepted as the key principle of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment. Unfortunately, for many years, the vast majority of AIS patients were prevented from receiving effective recanalization therapy because of a narrow therapeutic window. Recently, a series of inspiring clinical trials have indicated that more patients may benefit from delayed recanalization during an expanded therapeutic window, even up to 24 h after symptom onset. However, could potentially salvageable brain tissue (penumbra) in patients who do not receive medication within 24 h still possible to be saved?

scholarly journals Acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset or in extended time windows: an individualized approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642110211
Author(s):  
Georgios Magoufis ◽  
Apostolos Safouris ◽  
Guy Raphaeli ◽  
Odysseas Kargiotis ◽  
Klearchos Psychogios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
Late Presenters

Recent randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have revolutionized acute ischemic stroke care by extending the use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies in time windows that have been originally considered futile or even unsafe. Both systemic and endovascular reperfusion therapies have been shown to improve outcome in patients with wake-up strokes or symptom onset beyond 4.5 h for intravenous thrombolysis and beyond 6 h for endovascular treatment; however, they require advanced neuroimaging to select stroke patients safely. Experts have proposed simpler imaging algorithms but high-quality data on safety and efficacy are currently missing. RCTs used diverse imaging and clinical inclusion criteria for patient selection during the dawn of this novel stroke treatment paradigm. After taking into consideration the dismal prognosis of nonrecanalized ischemic stroke patients and the substantial clinical benefit of reperfusion therapies in selected late presenters, we propose rescue reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients not fulfilling all clinical and imaging inclusion criteria as an option in a subgroup of patients with clinical and radiological profiles suggesting low risk for complications, notably hemorrhagic transformation as well as local or remote parenchymal hemorrhage. Incorporating new data to treatment algorithms may seem perplexing to stroke physicians, since treatment and imaging capabilities of each stroke center may dictate diverse treatment pathways. This narrative review will summarize current data that will assist clinicians in the selection of those late presenters that will most likely benefit from acute reperfusion therapies. Different treatment algorithms are provided according to available neuroimaging and endovascular treatment capabilities.

scholarly journals Emergency Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass to Revascularize Salvageable Brain Tissue in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. e476-e485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Karl Burkhardt ◽  
Sebastian Winklhofer ◽  
Jorn Fierstra ◽  
Susanne Wegener ◽  
Giuseppe Esposito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Brain Tissue ◽  
Stroke Patients

Abstract T P188: Equivalency in Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment Rates Between Primary Stroke Centers and Non-Primary Stroke Centers Through the Use of Telestroke

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Archit Bhatt ◽  
Elizabeth Barban ◽  
Leslie Corless ◽  
Tamela Stuchiner ◽  
Amit Kansara
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Patient Arrival ◽  
History Of

Background: Research has shown that subjects evaluated at (Primary Stroke Centers) PSCs are more likely to receive rt–PA than those evaluated at non–PSCs. It is unknown if telestroke evaluation affects rt-PA rates at non-PSCs. We hypothesized that with a robust telestroke system rt-TPA rates among PSCs and non-PSCs are not significantly different. Methods and Results: Data were obtained from the Providence Stroke Registry from January 2010 to December 2012. We identified ischemic stroke patients (n=3307) who received care in Oregon and Southwest Washington, which include 2 PSCs and 14 non-PSCs. Intravenous rt–PA was administered to 7.3% (n=242) of ischemic patients overall, 8.4% (n=79) at non–PSCs and 6.9% (n=163) at PSCs (p=.135). Stroke neurologists evaluated 5.2 % (n=172) of all ischemic stroke patients (n=3307) were evaluated via telestroke robot. Our analysis included AIS (Acute Ischemic Stroke) patients, those presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. We identified 1070 AIS discharges from 16 hospitals of which 77.9 % (n=833) were at PSCs and 22.1 % (n=237) non-PSCs. For acute ischemic stroke patients (AIS) patients, those presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, 22.1% (n=237) received rt-PA; 21.5% (n=74) presented at non–PSCs and 23.7% (n=163) presented at PSCs. Among AIS, bivariate analysis showed significant differences in treatment rates by race, age, NIHSS at admit, previous stroke or TIA, PVD, use of robot, smoking and time from patient arrival to CT completed. Using multiple logistic regression adjusting for these variables, treatment was significantly related to admit NIHSS (AOR=1.67, p<.001), history of stroke (AOR=.323, p<.001), TIA (AOR=.303, p=.01) and PVD (AOR=.176, p=.02), time to CT (.971, p<.001), and use of robot (7.76, p<.001). PSC designation was not significantly related to treatment (p=.06). Conclusions: Through the use of a robust telestroke system, there are no significant differences in the TPA treatment rates between non-PSC and PSC facilities. Telestroke systems can ensure stroke patients access to acute stroke care at non-PSC hospitals.

Abstract TP52: Endovascular Therapy in Patients Over 80 Years of Age With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janhavi M Modak ◽  
Syed Daniyal Asad ◽  
Jussie Lima ◽  
Amre Nouh ◽  
Ilene Staff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Extended Time ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Outcomes ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke treatment has undergone a paradigm shift, with patients being treated in the extended time window (6-24 hours post symptom onset). The purpose of this study is to assess outcomes in stroke patients above 80 years of age undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in the extended time window. Methods: Acute ischemic stroke patients presenting to Hartford Hospital between January 2017 to June 2019 were considered for the study. Stroke outcomes in patients above 80 years of age with anterior circulation ischemic strokes presenting in the extended time window (Group A, n=30) were compared to a younger cohort of patients below 80 years (Group B, n=31). Patients over 80 years treated in the traditional time window (within 6 hours of symptom onset) served as a second set of controls (Group C, n=40). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of 0.05 Results: For angiographic results, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of good outcomes (TICI 2b-3) among patients of Group A, when compared to Groups B or C (p>0.05). For the endovascular procedures, no significant differences were noted in the total fluoroscopy time (Median Group A 44.05, Group B 38.1, Group C 35.25 min), total intra-procedure time (Median Group A 144, Group B 143, Group C 126 min) or total radiation exposure (Median Group A 8308, Group B 8960, Group C 8318 uGy-m 2 ). For stroke outcomes, a good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin score of 0-2 at discharge. Significantly better outcomes were noted in the younger patients in Group B - 35.4%, when compared to 13.3% in Group A (p=0.03). Comparative outcomes differed in the elderly patients above 80 years, Group A -13.3% vs Group C - 25%, although not statistically significant (p=0.23). There was a significant difference in mortality in patients of Group A - 40% as compared to 12% in the younger cohort, Group B (p= 0.01). Conclusions: In the extended time window, patients above 80 years of age were noted to have a higher mortality, morbidity compared to the younger cohort of patients. No significant differences were noted in the stroke outcomes in patients above 80 years of age when comparing the traditional and the extended time window for stroke treatment.

Abstract 3275: Early Neurological Improvement After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke Predicts Long-Term Functional Outcome

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard L Yeo ◽  
Liang Shen ◽  
Ben Wakerley ◽  
Aftab Ahmad ◽  
Kay W Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Neurological Improvement ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background: Intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-TPA) remains the only approved therapeutic agent for arterial recanalization in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Wide variations in the rates and timing of neurological recovery are observed in thrombolyzed patients. While all IV-TPA treated patients are routinely evaluated for neurological recovery at 24-hours, considerable improvement occurs in some cases within 2-hours of treatment initiation. We evaluated whether early neurological improvement at 2-hours after IV-TPA bolus (ENI-2) can predict functional outcomes in thrombolyzed AIS patients at 3-months. Methods: Data for consecutive stroke patients treated with IV-TPA within 4.5 hours of symptom-onset during 2007-2010 were prospectively entered in the thrombolyzed registry maintained at our tertiary care center. Data were collected for demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, stroke subtypes and blood pressure levels before IV-TPA bolus. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were obtained before IV-TPA bolus and at 2-hours. ENI-2 was defined as a reduction in NIHSS score by more than 10-points from baseline score or an absolute score of 4-points or less at 2-hours after IV-TPA bolus. Functional outcomes at 3-months were determined by modified Rankin scale (mRS). Data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0. Results: Of the 2238 AIS patients admitted during the study period, 240 (11%) received IV-TPA within 4.5-hours of symptom-onset. Median age was 65yrs (range 19-92), 63% males, median NIHSS 17points (range 3-35) and median onset-to-treatment time 149 minutes. Overall, 122 (50.8%) patients achieved favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 3-months. Factors associated with favorable outcome at 3-months on univariable analysis were younger age, female gender, presence of atrial fibrillation, baseline NIHSS, onset-to-treatment time (OTT) and ENI-2. However, multivariable analysis demonstrated NIHSS at onset (OR per 1-point increase 0.907, 95%CI 0.848-0.969) and ENI-2 (OR 4.926 95%CI 1.66-15.15) as independent predictors of favorable outcome at 3-months. Conclusion: Early Neurological improvement at 2-hours after IV-TPA bolus is a strong predictor of the functional outcome at 3-months in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Abstract WMP24: Reperfusion Into Severely Damaged Brain Tissue is Associated With Impending Parenchymal Hemorrhage in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Songlin Yu ◽  
Samantha J Ma ◽  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
Lirong Yan ◽  
Fabien Scalzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Brain Tissue ◽  
Stroke Patients

Acute Kidney Injury in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in Clinical Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan I. Qureshi ◽  
Hunain Aslam ◽  
Werdah Zafar ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Iryna Lobanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Stroke Patients

scholarly journals Mandatory Neuroendovascular Evolution: Meeting the New Demands

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
Mohammad El-Ghanem ◽  
Francisco E. Gomez ◽  
Prateeka Koul ◽  
Rolla Nuoman ◽  
Justin G. Santarelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Endovascular Intervention ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Hub And Spoke ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Traditionally, patients undergoing acute ischemic strokes were candidates for mechanical thrombectomy if they were within the 6-h window from onset of symptoms. This timeframe would exclude many patient populations, such as wake-up strokes. However, the most recent clinical trials, DAWN and DEFUSE3, have expanded the window of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients to within 24 h from symptom onset. This expanded window increases the number of potential candidates for endovascular intervention for emergent large vessel occlusions and raises the question of how to efficiently screen and triage this increase of patients. Summary: Abbreviated pre-hospital stroke scales can be used to guide EMS personnel in quickly deciding if a patient is undergoing a stroke. Telestroke networks connect remote hospitals to stroke specialists to improve the transportation time of the patient to a comprehensive stroke center for the appropriate level of care. Mobile stroke units, mobile interventional units, and helistroke reverse the traditional hub-and-spoke model by bringing imaging, tPA, and expertise to the patient. Smartphone applications and social media aid in educating patients and the public regarding acute and long-term stroke care. Key Messages: The DAWN and DEFUSE3 trials have expanded the treatment window for certain acute ischemic stroke patients with mechanical thrombectomy and subsequently have increased the number of potential candidates for endovascular intervention. This expansion brings patient screening and triaging to greater importance, as reducing the time from symptom onset to decision-to-treat and groin puncture can better stroke patient outcomes. Several strategies have been employed to address this issue by reducing the time of symptom onset to decision-to-treat time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document