scholarly journals Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052093015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Schwarze ◽  
Constantin Marschner ◽  
Wiebke Völckers ◽  
Sergio Grosu ◽  
Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Liver Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Experienced Radiologist ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Objective Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dynamic assessment of the microperfusion pattern of suspicious liver lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS compared with CT scans for assessing HCC. Methods We performed a retrospective, single-center study between 2004 and 2018 on 234 patients with suspicious liver lesions who underwent CEUS and CT examinations. All patients underwent native B-mode, color Doppler and CEUS after providing informed consent. Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level 3). Results CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 72% for analyzing HCC compared with CT as the diagnostic gold standard. Conclusions CEUS has an excellent safety profile and shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared with corresponding results from CT scans.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transcatheter Arterial Chemo-Embolization: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Jeng Tai ◽  
Ming-Te Huang ◽  
Chih-Hsiung Wu ◽  
Chen-Jei Tai ◽  
Yeu-Ching Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
The Mean

Background & Aims: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) are used to assess the response of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization. Our aim was to perform a systematic review to compare CEUS and CECT for therapeutic response assessment to transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Method: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception until January 1, 2016. Participants: patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Intervention: transarterial chemoembolization and CECT vs CEUS. Results. Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review. The total number of patients was 858 and the mean patient age ranged from 42 to 73 years. The mean tumor size ranged from 1.0 cm to 4.3 cm. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS ranged from 46% to 100% and 65% to 100%, respectively, and that of CECT ranged from 34% to 87% and 92% to 100%, respectively. The accuracy of CEUS ranged from 72.6% to 100% and that of CECT from 61% to 94%. Marked heterogeneity was present among the studies. Conclusion: CEUS is comparable with CECT for the therapeutic response assessment after transarterial chemoembolization. Abbreviations: CECT: Contrast-enhanced CT; CEUS: Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound; CT: Computed Tomography; HCC: Hepatocellular Carcinoma; MDCT: Multidetector row CT; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; mRECIST: modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; NPV: Negative Predictive Value; PPV: Positive Predictive Value; QUADAS-2: Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies; RFA: Radiofrequency Ablation; TACE: Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.

scholarly journals Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Evaluation of Bosniak III Complex Renal Cystic Lesions—A 10-Year Specialized European Single-Center Experience with Histopathological Validation

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 692
Author(s):  
Vincent Schwarze ◽  
Johannes Rübenthaler ◽  
Saša Čečatka ◽  
Constantin Marschner ◽  
Matthias Frank Froelich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Blood Pool ◽  
Histopathological Analysis ◽  
Cystic Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Renal Lesions ◽  
Experienced Radiologist ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Background and objectives: The aim of the present retrospective single-center study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing Bosniak III complex renal cystic lesions with histopathological validation. Materials and Methods: 49 patients with CEUS-categorized Bosniak III renal cystic lesions were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent native B-mode, Color Doppler, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) between 2010–2020. Eight and five patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively. Twenty-nine underwent (partial) nephrectomy allowing for histopathological analysis. The applied contrast agent for CEUS was a second-generation blood pool agent. Ultrasonography examinations were performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist with more than 15 years of experience (EFSUMB Level 3). Results: CEUS examinations were successfully performed in all included patients without registering any adverse effects. The malignancy rate of CEUS-categorized Bosniak III renal lesions accounted for 66%. Initially, cystic complexity was visualized in native B-mode. In none of the renal lesions hypervascularization was detected in Color Doppler. CEUS allowed for detection of contrast enhancement patterns in all included Bosniak III renal lesions. Delayed wash-out could be detected in 6/29 renal lesions. In two cases of histopathologically confirmed clear-cell RCC, appropriate up-grading from Bosniak IIF to III was achieved by CEUS. Conclusions: CEUS depicts a promising imaging modality for the precise diagnostic workup and stratification of renal cystic lesions according to the Bosniak classification system, thereby helping guidance of adequate clinical management in the future.

scholarly journals Contrast-enhanced ultrasound algorithm (ACR CEUS LI-RADSv 2017)– a valuable tool for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria Ghiuchici ◽  
Mirela Dănilă ◽  
Alina Popescu ◽  
Roxana Șirli ◽  
Tudor Moga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Noninvasive Diagnosis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Malignant Lesions

Aims: to evaluate the accuracy of LR-5 category from the latest Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound algorithm (ACR CEUS LI-RADSv 2017) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in a real-life cohort of high-risk patients. Material and methods: We retrospectively re-analysed the CEUS studies of 464 focal liver lesions (FLL) in 382 patients at high-risk for HCC (liver cirrhosis of any aetiology, chronic B or C hepatitis with severe fibrosis) using the ACR CEUS LI-RADSv 2017 algorithm. CEUS LI-RADS categories used for the diagnosis of HCC were: CEUS LR-5 (definitely HCC) and CEUS LR-TIV (HCC with macrovascular invasion). Contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced MRI, or histology were used as diagnostic reference methods to evaluate the CEUS LI-RADS classification of the 464 lesions. Results: According to the reference method, the 464 lesions were classified as follows: 359 HCCs, 68 non-HCC-non-malignant lesions and 37 non-HCC malignant lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of LR-5 category for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was 76.9%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 71.9%, 94.3 %, 97.7% and 49.5%, respectively. Conclusions: LR-5 category from ACR CEUS LI-RADSv 2017 algorithm, has good sensitivity, excellent specificity, and PPV for the diagnosis of HCC. The HCC rate increases from LR-3 to LR-5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document