Reliability and Accuracy of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. S14-S16 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Carcoforo ◽  
G Soliani ◽  
L Bergossi ◽  
E Basaglia ◽  
AR Virgili ◽  
...  

Aims and Background The aims of this study were 1) to investigate whether sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy could become the method of choice for the early detection of metastatic disease in patients with malignant melanoma and 2) to identify those patients with lymph node metastases who could benefit from regional lymphadenectomy. Methods and Study Design Our study started in March 1998 and involved 110 patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma stage I or II (AJCC) in whom the primary lesion had been surgically removed no more than 90 days previously. On the day of lymph node dissection patients were given an intradermal injection of colloid particles of human serum albumin labeled with technetium-99m and an injection of isosulfan blue. The surgical procedure was usually performed with local anesthesia but in some cases locoregional or general anesthesia was preferred. Contralateral and ipsilateral lymphatic areas were scanned with a hand-held gamma camera (Scintiprobe MR 100) to measure the background and identify the hot point indicating the location of the sentinel node to direct the incision. Results The combined use of lymphoscintigraphy, isosulfan blue and gamma probe allowed us to identify sentinel nodes in 108 of 110 patients (98.18%) while the SLN was blue in only 90 cases (81.81%). The SLN was positive for metastases in 13 of the 108 patients (12.03%) and regional and distal lymphadenectomy was performed in all of them. The distribution of positive SLNs by primary lesion thickness was as follows: 0.76-1.5 mm: one positive SLN/44 patients (2.27%); 1.51-4 mm: six positive SLNs/51 patients (11.7%); >4 mm: six positive SLNs/15 patients (40%). Only four of 12 patients with ulcerated cutaneous melanoma had positive SLNs. The patients in our study underwent follow-up visits every four months. The median follow-up was 481 days (range, 97-1271 days). Conclusions In patients with primary cutaneous melanoma the histological status of the SLN accurately reflects the presence or absence of metastatic disease in the relevant regional lymph node basin. Complete lymph node dissection should only be performed in patients with positive SLNs. Patients with lesions >4 mm are likely to develop recurrences and to die of systemic disease, so in these patients the usefulness of SLN biopsy is questionable. In conclusion, sentinel node mapping is a rational approach for the selection of patients who might benefit from early lymph node dissection of the affected basin.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Tanaka ◽  
Hiroki Mori ◽  
Mutsumi Okazaki ◽  
Aya Nishizawa ◽  
Hiroo Yokozeki

We present a patient with malignant melanoma on his heel. Wide local excision was performed, along with sentinel lymph node biopsy of the inguinal and popliteal lesions. The primary site was clear of tumor at all margins; the inguinal nodes were negative, but the popliteal node was positive for metastatic melanoma. Only radical popliteal lymph node dissection was performed. The patient went on to receive adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. There was no recurrence or complication until the long-term followup. Popliteal drainage from below the knee is uncommon, and the rate of popliteal-positive and inguinal-negative cases is estimated to be less than 1% of all melanomas. There is no established evidence about how to treat lymph nodes in these cases. Because we considered popliteal nodes as a regional, not interval, lymph node basin, only popliteal lymph node dissection was performed, and good postoperative course was achieved. The first site of drainage is the sentinel node, and the popliteal node can be a sentinel node. The inguinal node is not a sentinel node in all lower extremity melanomas. This case illustrates the importance of individual detailed investigation of lymphatic drainage patterns from foot to inguinal and popliteal nodes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederico Teixeira ◽  
Vitor Moutinho ◽  
Eduardo Akaishi ◽  
Gabriella Mendes ◽  
Andre Perina ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4028-4028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Young Woo Kim ◽  
Jae Seok Min ◽  
Hong Man Yoon ◽  
Ji Yeong An ◽  
...  

4028 Background: The benefits and hazards of laparoscopic sentinel node oriented stomach-preserving surgery, compared to those of laparoscopic standard gastrectomy with lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer (EGC), are unknown. The SENORITA trial investigated the clinical impact of laparoscopic sentinel node oriented stomach-preserving surgery in EGC. Methods: Other than those with absolute indication for endoscopic resection, eligible patients had EGC confined to the mucosa and submucosa, with diameter ≤ 3cm, regardless of histology on preoperative evaluation. Patients were randomized for laparoscopic standard gastrectomy or laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery. Patients were stratified based on depth (mucosa vs. submucosa) and size (≤ 2cm vs. 2 < ≤ 3cm) of the EGC and by participating institution. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (3yDFS). The expected 3yDFS was 97% and non-inferior margin was 5%. 580 patients and 24 events were needed to show non-inferiority with 80% power. One interim analysis was planned after 12 events (50%) occurred. Using the O’Brien-Fleming error spending function, the two-sided nominal significance level for the interim analysis would be 0.0054. Results: From March 2013 to May 2016 462 patients were randomized; analysis was performed in 421 after a dropout of 41 patients. Laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery was possible in 75.6% by study protocol. Interim analysis was conducted based on 12 events (median follow-up: 15.89 months). The 3yDFS in the laparoscopic standard gastrectomy arm was 96%; the 3yDFS in the laparoscopic stomach-preserving surgery arm was 93%, (99.46% CI: -3.18%, 9.18%). The postoperative complication rates were 15.0% and 12.9%, respectively (p = 0.542). Conclusions: In this interim analysis, laparoscopic sentinel node oriented stomach-preserving surgery did not show non-inferiority for 3yDFS. The follow-up time was not mature enough to evaluate non-inferiority. Further follow-up will elucidate the role of laparoscopic sentinel node oriented stomach-preserving surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document