Developing a Preceptorship Programme for Newly Qualified Occupational Therapists: Action Research

2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 330-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Morley

This action research study used three focus groups and one interview to explore the experiences of five recently qualified occupational therapists, four supervisors and five occupational therapy managers. The participants were asked to identify the perceived development needs of new practitioners and the mechanisms that supported or hindered these being met. The findings showed that the recently qualified occupational therapists experienced satisfaction at making a difference in their first posts. However, for some, their first post had fallen short of their expectations because they faced challenges when moving from student to practitioner, sometimes with limited support. The participants identified development needs that they felt were common to other new practitioners and also the factors that constrained or enabled the meeting of these needs. These findings informed the second phase of the action research study to design a preceptorship programme that was compliant with the revised National Health Service employment contract (Department of Health 2005) and would improve the transitional experience of occupational therapists. This paper presents the focus group results and the rationale for the preceptorship programme, which was launched as a pilot evaluation study with occupational therapy staff from over 20 organisations in Autumn 2005.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 1527-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Majid Vafaei ◽  
Zahra Sadat Manzari ◽  
Abbas Heydari ◽  
Razieh Froutan ◽  
Leila Amiri Farahani

BACKGROUND: Standardization of documentation has enabled the use of medical records as a primary tool for evaluating health care functions and obtaining appropriate credit points for medical centres. However, previous studies have shown that the quality of medical records in emergency departments is unsatisfactory.AIM: The aim of this study was improving the nursing care documentation in an emergency department, in Iran.MATERIAL AND METHODS: This collaborative action research study was carried out in two phases to improve nursing care documentation in cooperation with individuals involved in the process, from February 2015 to December 2017 in an affiliated academic hospital in Iran. The first phase featured virtual training, an educational workshop, and improvements to the hospital information system. The second phase involved the recruitment of human resources, the implementation of continuous codified training, the establishment of an appropriate reward and penalty system, and the review of patient education forms.RESULTS: The interventions improved nursing documentation quality score of 73.20%, which was the highest accreditation ranking provided by Iran’s Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2017. In other words, this study caused a 32% improvement in the quality of nursing care documentation in the hospital.CONCLUSION: The appropriate practices for improving nursing care documentation are employee participation, managerial accountability, nurses’ adherence to documentation standards, improved leadership style, and continuous monitoring and control.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hartney ◽  
Ellen Melis ◽  
Deanne Taylor ◽  
Graham Dickson ◽  
Bill Tholl ◽  
...  

Purpose This first phase of a three-phase action research project aims to define leadership practices that should be used during and after the pandemic to re-imagine and rebuild the health and social care system. Specifically, the objectives were to determine what effective leadership practices Canadian health leaders have used through the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, to explore how these differ from pre-crisis practices; and to identify what leadership practices might be leveraged to create the desired health and care systems of the future. Design/methodology/approach The authors used an action research methodology. In the first phase, reported here, the authors conducted one-on-one, virtual interviews with 18 health leaders from across Canada and across leadership roles. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. Findings Five key practices emerged from the data, within the core dimension of disrupting entrenched structures and leadership practices. These were, namely, responding to more complex emotions in self and others. Future practice identified to create more psychologically supportive workplaces. Agile and adaptive leadership. Future practice should allow leaders to move systemic change forward more quickly. Integrating diverse perspectives, within and across organizations, leveling hierarchies through bringing together a variety of perspectives in the decision-making process and engaging people more broadly in the co-creation of strategies. Applying existing leadership capabilities and experience. Future practice should develop and expand mentorship to support early career leadership. Communication was increased to build credibility and trust in response to changing and often contradictory emerging evidence and messaging. Future practice should increase communication. Research limitations/implications The project was limited to health leaders in Canada and did not represent all provinces/territories. Participants were recruited through the leadership networks, while diverse, were not demographically representative. All interviews were conducted in English; in the second phase of the study, the authors will recruit a larger and more diverse sample and conduct interviews in both English and French. As the interviews took place during the early stages of the pandemic, it may be that health leaders’ views of what may be required to re-define future health systems may change as the crisis shifts over time. Practical implications The sponsoring organization of this research – the Canadian Health Leadership Network and each of its individual member partners – will mobilize knowledge from this research, and subsequent phases, to inform processes for leadership development and, succession planning across, the Canadian health system, particularly those attributes unique to a context of crisis management but also necessary in post-crisis recovery. Social implications This research has shown that there is an immediate need to develop innovative and influential leadership action – commensurate with its findings – to supporting the evolution of the Canadian health system, the emotional well-being of the health-care workforce, the mental health of the population and challenges inherent in structural inequities across health and health care that discriminate against certain populations. Originality/value An interdisciplinary group of health researchers and decision-makers from across Canada who came together rapidly to examine leadership practices during COVID-19’s first wave using action research study design.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (CSCW1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Nolte ◽  
Linda Bailey Hayden ◽  
James D. Herbsleb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document