scholarly journals Epidural Pethidine or Fentanyl during Caesarean Section: A Double-Blind Comparison

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Paech
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Epidural Fentanyl ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Bolus Dose ◽  
Clinical Advantage ◽  
Blind Comparison

The onset, quality and duration of analgesia and side-effects of a single bolus dose of either epidural pethidine 50 mg or fentanyl 100 mcg, administered immediately post-delivery, were compared in a randomised, double-blind study of fifty-five women undergoing epidural caesarean section. The onset of effect was more rapid with fentanyl, a significantly larger number of women achieving complete pain relief fifteen minutes post-administration (P<0.05). The quality of analgesia was good in both groups and the quality and duration of effective analgesia not significantly different. The incidence and severity of side-effects were low, with no significant difference between groups. One patient in the pethidine group experienced early onset respiratory depression; however, she did not require active treatment. Epidural fentanyl 100 mcg appears to offer a small clinical advantage over pethidine 50 mg for intraoperative use during caesarean section.

Sulphadiazine/Trimethoprim Once Daily in Maxillary Sinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison with Sulphamethoxazole/Trimethoprim B.I.D.

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Federspil ◽  
Peter Bamberg
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Favourable Result ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Cure Rates

In a randomized double-blind study fifty-four patients suffering from acute maxillary sinusitis were treated for 10 days with daily doses of sulphadiazine/trimethopim (1 g) and sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.92 g), respectively. The efficacy was evaluated clinically at two follow-up visits. X-ray investigations were performed at admission and after the therapy. Of thirty-nine patients finally evaluated, thirty-seven showed a favourable result. After 6–8 days of therapy there was significant difference in cure rates in favour of sulphadiazine/trimethoprim (p < 0.05) while the outcome as evaluated after treatment was similar for both drugs.

A 6-months, randomised, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in osteoarthritis patients naïve to potent opioids

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Breivik ◽  
Tone Marte Ljosaa ◽  
Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen ◽  
Jan Persson ◽  
Hannu Aro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Local Skin

AbstractObjectivePatients with osteoarthritis (OA) pain often have insufficient pain relief from non-opioid analgesics. The aim of this trial was to study efficacy and tolerability of a low dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal delivery system, added to a NSAID or coxib regimen, in opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe OA pain.MethodsA 6 months randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study at 19 centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, in which OA patients (>40 years) with at least moderate radiographic OA changes and at least moderate pain in a hip and/or knee while on a NSAID or a coxib were randomised to a 7-day buprenorphine patch (n = 100) or an identical placebo patch (n = 99). The initial patch delivered buprenorphine 5 μg/h. This was titrated to 10 or 20 μg/h, as needed. Rescue analgesic was paracetamol 0.5–4 g daily. Statistical analysis of outcome data was mainly with a general linear model, with treatment as factor, the primary joint of osteoarthritis, baseline scores, and season as covariates.ResultsMost patients had OA-radiographic grade II (moderate) or grade III (severe), only 8 in each group had very severe OA (grade IV). The median buprenorphine dose was 10 μg/h. 31 buprenorphine-treated patients and 2 placebo-treated patients withdrew because of side effects. Lack of effect caused 12 placebo-treated and 7 buprenorphine-treated patients to withdraw. The differences in effects between treatments: Daytime pain on movement, recorded every evening on a 0–10 numeric rating scale decreased significantly more (P = 0.029) in the buprenorphine group. Patients’ Global Impression of Change at the end of the double blind period was significantly improved in the buprenorphine group (P = 0.017). The chosen primary effect outcome measure, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index for Pain (P = 0.061), and secondary outcome measures, the WOMAC OA score for functional abilities (P = 0.055), and the WOMAC total score (P = 0.059) indicated more effects from buprenorphine than placebo, but these differences were not statistically significant. In a post-hoc, subgroup analysis with the 16 patients with radiographic grad IV (very severe) excluded, WOMAC OA Index for Pain was significantly (P = 0.039) reduced by buprenorphine, compared with placebo. WOMAC OA score for stiffness and the amount of rescue medication taken did not differ. Sleep disturbance, quality of sleep, and quality of life improved in both groups. Side effects: Typical opioid side effects caused withdrawal at a median of 11 days before completing the 168 days double blind trial in 1/3 of the buprenorphine group. Mostly mild local skin reactions occurred equally often (1/3) in both groups.ConclusionsAlthough the 24 hours WOMAC OsteoArthritis Index of pain was not statistically significantly superior to placebo, day-time movement-related pain and patients’ global impression of improvement at the end of the 6-months double blind treatment period were significantly better in patients treated with buprenorphine compared with placebo. Opioid side effects caused 1/3 of the buprenorphine-patients to withdraw before the end of the 6-months double blind study period.ImplicationsA low dose 7-days buprenorphine patch at 5–20 μg/h is a possible means of pain relief in about 2/3 of elderly osteoarthritis patients, in whom pain is opioid-sensitive, surgery is not possible, NSAIDs and coxibs are not recommended, and paracetamol in tolerable doses is not effective enough. Vigilant focus on and management of opioid side effects are essential.

Daflon 500 mg: Symptoms and Edema

Angiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. S25-S32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert-Adrien Ramelet
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Significant Difference

Patients suffering from any class of the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification of chronic venous disease (CVD) may be symptomatic (C0s-C6s). Leg heaviness, discomfort, itching, cramps, pain, paresthesia, and edema (C3) are the most frequent manifestations of CVD and a major reason for medical consultation. Daflon 500 mg (micronized purified flavonoid fraction [MPFF]) is an effective treatment for symptoms and edema in CVD as demonstrated in several randomized controlled studies. A 2-month, double-blind study in 40 patients established the superiority of Daflon 500 mg over placebo with regard to symptoms and objective signs. This was confirmed in another double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2 months’ treatment, 160 patients), and in the Reflux assEssment and quaLity of lIfe improvEment with micronized Flavonoids (RELIEF) study. The latter included 5,052 patients in 23 countries, using a visual analog scale for evaluating pain, leg heaviness, cramps, and a sensation of swelling. All symptoms showed significant and progressive improvement. The quality-of-life results (scores on the ChronIc Venous Insufficiency quality of life Questionnaire [CIVIQ]) paralleled those of symptoms. The decrease in the ankle and calf circumferences was significantly greater (p<0.001) in the group of patients treated with Daflon 500 mg in two studies, and correlated well with the improvement in the sensation of swelling (p<0.001). This was confirmed with more sophisticated measurement techniques as in the RELIEF study or in a trial assessing edema with an optoelectronic volumeter in 20 patients. A further double-blind, randomized, controlled study established a statistically significant difference in favor of Daflon 500 mg in comparison with diosmin, both on symptoms and edema. The therapeutic efficacy of Daflon 500 mg on CVD symptoms and edema has been demonstrated in double-blind, randomized, controlled studies. Further studies using a new approach may define the most precise and validated methodology for application in future research in phlebology.

Double-Blind Comparison of Maternal Analgesia and Neonatal Neurobehaviour following Intravenous Butorphanol and Meperidine

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hodgkinson ◽  
Robert W Huff ◽  
Robert H Hayashi ◽  
Farkhanda J Husain
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Foetal Heart Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cervical Dilation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison

Butorphanol (1 mg and 2 mg) and meperidine (40 mg and 80 mg), given intravenously, were evaluated for analgesic efficacy and safety in a double-blind randomized study employing 200 consenting pre-partum patients in moderate to severe pain during the late first stage of labour. Both drugs provided adequate relief of pain to the mothers. There was no significant difference in the rate of cervical dilation, the foetal heart rate, the Apgar score, pain relief or neonatal neurobehavioural scores between those receiving butorphanol and those receiving meperidine. Twenty-two mothers who received butorphanol and eleven who received meperidine nursed their infants with no adverse effects observed. Side-effects were generally infrequent in this study; however, more side-effects were reported by the patients and observed by the investigator in the meperidine-treated cases (13%) than in the cases treated with butorphanol (2%).

A Double-Blind Out-Patient Trial of Indalpine vs Mianserin

1985 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Naylor ◽  
B. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Antidepressant Effect ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference

SummaryIndalpine 150 mg per day and mianserin 60 mg per day were compared in a double-blind study of 65 depressed out-patients: 52 patients completed the 4-week trial. At the end of four weeks there was no significant difference in antidepressant effect between the two drugs; but in the first two weeks, improvement in the mianserin-treated group was significantly greater than that in the indalpine group. The mianserin-treated group reported more side-effects of sedation (eg. drowsiness, clumsiness, heaviness of limbs etc.) and one patient on indalpine developed a mild leucopenia.

scholarly journals Postoperative Epidural Fentanyl Infusion—is the Addition of 0.1% Bupivacaine of Benefit?

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Paech ◽  
M. D. Westmore
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Epidural Fentanyl ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Limb Weakness ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Thoracic Epidural ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sparing Effect ◽  
Fentanyl Infusion

A randomised, double-blind controlled clinical trial was conducted in 90 women scheduled for major abdominal gynaecological oncology surgery to determine the effect of adding 0.1% plain bupivacaine to a thoracic epidural fentanyl infusion. Following combined epidural and general anaesthesia, patients were randomised to receive epidural fentanyl 10 μg/ml, with (group FB) or without (group F) bupivacaine. After an initial 50 μg bolus of fentanyl, infusion rate was adjusted according to need between 2 and 10 ml/hr for 48 hours. The two groups (n = 40) were similar with regard to age, weight and preoperative status. Analgesia both at rest and with movement were significantly better in group FB (P < 0.0001) during the first 24 hours postoperatively, the greatest difference occurring in the 4 to 16 hour period. There was no significant difference between groups from 24 to 48 hours postoperatively. Fentanyl utilisation was significantly lower in group FB (median 41 versus 53 μg/hr, P <0.001), although clinically the fentanyl dose-sparing effect of bupivacaine was small and did not reduce opioid-induced side-effects. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to side-effects or lower limb weakness, although fewer patients in group FB could be mobilised on the morning of the first postoperative day (P <0.01). Nevertherless, all study patients were ambulant by the same afternoon. We concluded that, in this patient population, the addition of 0.1% bupivacaine to a thoracic epidural fentanyl infusion was beneficial in the early postoperative period.

Double-Blind Study of Dothiepin versus Placebo in the Treatment of Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome

1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Caruso ◽  
P. C. Sarzi Puttini ◽  
L. Boccassini ◽  
S. Santandrea ◽  
M. Locati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Fibromyalgia Syndrome ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Variables ◽  
Primary Fibromyalgia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome

A double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of dothiepin with that of placebo in the treatment of primary fibromyalgia syndrome was carried out. Dothiepin was shown to improve significantly the condition of patients with primary fibromyalgia syndrome and there was a significant difference between dothiepin and placebo in all the clinical variables measured. Only mild and transient side-effects were reported. Further controlled studies are required to define the effects of dothiepin on fibromyalgia.

scholarly journals The Influence of Adrenaline on Postoperative Analgesia after Subarachnoid Morphine

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Paech
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Gynaecological Surgery ◽  
Normal Saline Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
To Receive

A randomised, double-blind study was conducted to investigate the postoperative effects of subarachnoid morphine, with or without adrenaline, after major gynaecological surgery. Seventy-five women having spinal anaesthesia combined with either sedation or general anaesthesia were randomised to receive subarachnoid morphine 0.25 mg with (group MA) or without (group M) adrenaline 200 ūg; or normal saline (group C). Groups M (n=22) and MA (n=25) differed significantly from control (n=23) with respect to the quality and duration of postoperative analgesia (P<0.0002) and to a higher incidence of pruritus (P<0.02). Groups were similar with respect to the incidence of other postoperative side-effects and respiratory data, although the latter showed a trend to less hypoxaemia in the control group. There was no significant difference in any outcome between groups MA and M. It was concluded that, under the study conditions in a post-gynaecological surgery population, the addition of adrenaline to subarachnoid morphine was of no benefit.

scholarly journals Analgesic Effect of Intraarticular Tramadol with Morphine after Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Hussain Faisal ◽  
Arjun Lamichhane ◽  
Deepak Mahara
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Work Load ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Morphine Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Post-operative improved pain control of patients has made arthroscopy as a day care procedure, reducing patient’s expenses and hospital staffs work load. Various analgesic drugs have been administered into the joint following Arthroscopy. Intra-articular injection of morphine has been practiced in many centres all over the world. We aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-articular tramadol and morphine. Tramadol is an opioid drug with similar analgesic properties like morphine. Tramadol unlike morphine is readily available over the counter not being abused and has more favourable side effects. Methods: It was a prospectively randomized double-blind study in which sixty patients having elective arthroscopic surgery of the knee were randomized into two groups. Group A (Tramadol Group) received intra-articular tramadol 50mg and Group B (Morphine Group) received morphine 5mg in equivalent volumes. Post-operative pain using Visual Analogue Score (VAS) between 0 and 10, (0 no pain to 10 worst pain) requirement of first analgesic, and incidence of side effects were recorded postoperatively at intervals of 3,4,5,6 and 24 hours. Results: The assessment of VAS score among the two groups in 3,4,5,6 and 24 hours of IA injection showed a p value of 0.349, 0.807, 0.676, 0.271 and 0.163 respectively, suggesting non significant difference in two groups. There was statistically significant result (p=0.005) for request of first analgesia (Ibuprofen 400mg+ Paracetalmol 500mg) at 6 hours of IA injection with tramadol group, requiring less analgesics. There are no other clinically important differences between the groups, including preoperative duration of symptoms, postoperative pain scores and side effects irrespective of the diagnosis and the procedure performed. Conclusion: 50 mg IA tramadol provides analgesia equivalent to 5 mg IA morphine. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/noaj.v3i1.9320 Nepal Orthopedic Association Journal 2013 Vol.3(1): 14-18

Efficacy of different infusion rates of oxytocin for maintaining uterine tone during elective caesarean section: A randomised double blind trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2098448
Author(s):  
Medha Mohta ◽  
Rohit B Chowdhury ◽  
Asha Tyagi ◽  
Rachna Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Postpartum Haemorrhage ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oxytocin Infusion

Most research in this field has focused on finding oxytocin doses for initiating uterine contractions. Only limited data are available regarding the optimal rate of oxytocin infusion to maintain adequate uterine tone. This randomised, double blind study included 120 healthy term pregnant patients with uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Following an initial 1 IU bolus, the patients received oxytocin infusion at 1.25 IU/hour (group 1.25), 2.5 IU/hour (group 2.5) or 5.0 IU/hour (group 5) for four hours. Uterine tone was assessed as adequate or inadequate at various intervals. If found inadequate, additional uterotonics were administered. Estimated blood loss was mean (standard deviation) 499 (172) ml, 454 (117) ml and 402 (151) ml in groups 1.25, 2.5 and 5, respectively ( P value groups 1.25 versus 5 = 0.012). Oxytocin infusion at 5 IU/hour resulted in a significantly lower incidence of minor postpartum haemorrhage, defined as blood loss greater than 500 ml, than 1.25 IU/hour ( P = 0.009). No patient had major/severe haemorrhage (>1000 ml blood loss). No significant difference was seen in haemoglobin levels ( P = 0.677) and uterine tone. Fifteen, six and nine patients, respectively, required additional oxytocin ( P = 0.151). The incidence of tachycardia ( P = 0.726), hypotension ( P = 0.321) and nausea/vomiting ( P = 0.161) was comparable. To conclude, 5 IU/hour was more effective than 1.25 IU/hour in reducing total blood loss and the incidence of minor postpartum haemorrhage. Thus 5 IU/hour appears to be an optimal oxytocin infusion rate following 1 IU slow intravenous oxytocin injection for the maintenance of adequate uterine contraction in patients undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document