scholarly journals A systematic review of treatment for patients with burning mouth syndrome

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 033310242110361
Author(s):  
Huann Lan Tan ◽  
Jared G Smith ◽  
Jan Hoffmann ◽  
Tara Renton

Background Burning mouth syndrome is a chronic idiopathic intractable intraoral dysaesthesia that remains a challenge to clinicians due to its poorly understood pathogenesis and inconsistent response to various treatments. Aim This review aimed to study the short- (≤3 months) and long-term (>3 months) effectiveness and sustainable benefit of different burning mouth syndrome treatment strategies and the associated side effects. Materials and methods Randomised controlled trials of burning mouth syndrome treatment compared with placebo or other interventions with a minimum follow up of 2 months were searched from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database (published to July 2020). Results Twenty-two studies were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and analysed. Nine categories of burning mouth syndrome treatment were identified: Anticonvulsant and antidepressant agents, phytomedicine and alpha lipoic acid supplements, low-level laser therapy, saliva substitute, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and cognitive behaviour therapy. Cognitive behaviour therapy, topical capsaicin and clonazepam, and laser therapy demonstrated favourable outcome in both short- and long-term assessment. Phytomedicines reported a short-term benefit in pain score reduction. The pooled effect of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) pain score improvement was low, but its positive effects increased in long term assessment. Conclusion A more significant volume in terms of sample size, multi-centres, and multi-arm comparison of therapeutic agents with placebo and longitudinal follow-up studies is recommended to establish a standardised burning mouth syndrome treatment protocol. Further studies are required to assess the analgesic benefits of topical clonazepam and capsaicin, alternative medicines with neurodegenerative prevention capability and psychology support in treating burning mouth syndrome and reducing systemic adverse drug reactions. Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): Protocol ID - CRD42020160892.

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthonie Janse ◽  
Stephanie Nikolaus ◽  
Jan F. Wiborg ◽  
Marianne Heins ◽  
Jos W.M. van der Meer ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Kenardy ◽  
Susan Robinson ◽  
Rian Dob

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 612-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
M F M Gielissen ◽  
C A H H V M Verhagen ◽  
G Bleijenberg

2001 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 298-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valdo Ricca ◽  
Edoardo Mannucci ◽  
Barbara Mezzani ◽  
Sandra Moretti ◽  
Milena Di Bernardo ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. DURHAM ◽  
J. A. CHAMBERS ◽  
R. R. MACDONALD ◽  
K. G. POWER ◽  
K. MAJOR

Background. Generalized anxiety disorder is a common condition of excessive worry and tension which tends to run a chronic course associated with significant psychiatric and medical problems. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has been shown to be of clinical value in about 50% of cases with treatment gains maintained over follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 12 months. The potential value of CBT over the longer term has not been subject to rigorous investigation.Method. Results are reported of 8–14 year follow-up of two randomized controlled trials of cognitive-behaviour therapy for generalized anxiety disorder employing structured interview with an assessor blind to initial treatment condition. Comparison groups included medication and placebo in one study based in primary care, and analytical psychotherapy in the other based in secondary care. Follow-up samples (30% and 55% of trial entrants) were broadly representative of the original cohorts.Results. Overall, 50% of participants were markedly improved of whom 30–40% were recovered (i.e. free of symptoms). Outcome was significantly worse for the study based in secondary care in which the clinical presentation of participants was more complex and severe. For a minority (30–40%), mainly from the secondary care study, outcome was poor. Treatment with CBT was associated with significantly lower overall severity of symptomatology and less interim treatment, in comparison with non-CBT conditions, but there was no evidence that CBT influenced diagnostic status, probability of recovery or patient perceptions of overall improvement.Conclusions. Both CBT and the complexity and severity of presenting problems appear to influence the long-term outcome of GAD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document