Meniscal Extrusion Does Not Progress During the Midterm Follow-up Period After Lateral Meniscal Transplantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 900-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam-Ki Kim ◽  
Seong-Il Bin ◽  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Chang-Rack Lee ◽  
Jae-Hyan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Meniscal Extrusion ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Absolute

Background: Meniscal extrusion is related to degeneration of the native knee joint. However, the clinical effect of the phenomenon after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has not been clearly identified. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in meniscal extrusion in both the coronal and sagittal planes after lateral MAT through the midterm follow-up period. We hypothesized that meniscal extrusion does not progress during the midterm follow-up period. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 46 patients with a mean follow-up of 51.1 ± 7.1 months were included in the study. The patients underwent lateral MAT using the keyhole technique. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 6-week, 1-year, and midterm (3- to 5-year) follow-up. In the coronal plane, the absolute value of meniscal subluxation and the relative percentage of extrusion (RPE) were measured. In the sagittal plane, meniscal subluxation was measured as the absolute and relative anterior cartilage meniscal distance (ACMD) and posterior cartilage meniscal distance (PCMD). The joint-space width (JSW) on weightbearing radiographs with 2 different knee positions was measured preoperatively and at 1-year and midterm follow-up. The Lysholm score was assessed at the same time points. Results: In the coronal plane, the mean absolute meniscal extrusion at 6-week, 1-year, and final follow-up was 2.90 ± 0.94, 2.85 ± 0.97, and 2.83 ± 0.89 mm, respectively, and the mean RPE was 27.0% ± 9.4%, 27.1% ± 10.1%, and 27.8% ± 9.7%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute and relative coronal extrusion among the 3 time periods ( P > .05). The percentage of patients with meniscal extrusion (≥3 mm) was 37.0% at 6-week follow-up and 34.8% at 1-year and final follow-up. In the sagittal plane, the mean absolute ACMD was 2.59 ± 1.75, 2.58 ± 1.85, and 2.37 ± 1.60 mm, respectively, and the mean relative ACMD was 20.7% ± 13.1%, 20.6% ± 13.8%, and 19.0% ± 12.2%, respectively, at the 3 follow-up time points. The mean absolute PCMD was −1.23 ± 3.34, −1.28 ± 3.08, and −1.42 ± 2.77 mm, respectively, and the mean relative PCMD was −10.3% ± 25.9%, −11.0% ± 24.6%, and −12.2% ± 23.2%, respectively, at the same time points. Sagittal extrusion was not significantly different between the time points ( P > .05). The mean JSW at 2 days preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and midterm follow-up was 5.40 ± 1.07, 5.44 ± 1.04, and 5.43 ± 0.98 mm, respectively, on anterior-posterior radiographs with full extension, and it was 4.90 ± 0.94, 4.94 ± 0.98, and 4.89 ± 0.96 mm, respectively, on posterior-anterior radiographs with 45° of flexion. The mean JSW values were not significantly different between the 3 different time points ( P > .05). The mean preoperative Lysholm score was 58. 9 ± 8.3; the score increased to 90.4 ± 9.7 at 1 year postoperatively and 90.5 ± 10.1 at final follow-up, which is a significant improvement compared with the preoperative status ( P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference between the scores at the 2 postoperative time points ( P > .05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that extrusion of the meniscal allograft did not significantly progress either in the coronal or sagittal plane after lateral MAT during the midterm follow-up period.

scholarly journals Progression of Allograft Extrusion in Both the Coronal and Sagittal Planes at Midterm Follow-up After Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplant

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596712097235
Author(s):  
Hanwook Kim ◽  
Seong-Il Bin ◽  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Bum-Sik Lee ◽  
Dong-Wook Sohn
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Relative Percentage ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Axial Alignment ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Absolute

Background: Although many studies have examined allograft extrusion after medial meniscal allograft transplant (MMAT), it is unclear whether allograft extrusion progresses at midterm follow-up. Hypothesis: After MMAT, allograft extrusion would not progress during the midterm follow-up period. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 30 patients who underwent MMAT between December 1996 and March 2016 were enrolled. Allograft extrusion was measured on magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 3 to 7 years postoperatively. In the coronal plane, the absolute allograft extrusion and relative percentage of extrusion were measured. In the sagittal plane, the absolute and relative anterior cartilage meniscal distance and posterior cartilage meniscal distance were measured. The joint-space width (JSW) on radiographic Rosenberg view was measured at 3 time points. The axial alignment was measured preoperatively and at the midterm follow-up. Results: In the coronal plane, there were no significant differences in absolute and relative coronal extrusions between 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively; however, the values were significantly increased at midterm follow-up compared with both of the earlier follow-up periods. Similarly, in the sagittal plane, the mean absolute and relative anterior and posterior cartilage meniscal distances were not significantly different between 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively but showed significant increases at midterm follow-up compared with both of the earlier follow-up periods. The mean preoperative axial alignment showed a positive correlation with the delta value of relative percentage of extrusion in the coronal plane ( r = 0.378; P = .036). The mean JSW was 4.42 ± 0.88 mm preoperatively, 4.30 ± 0.83 mm at 1-year follow-up, and 3.96 ± 1.06 mm at the midterm follow-up. No significant difference was found between the preoperative and postoperative 1-year values, but the mean JSW was significantly decreased at midterm follow-up compared with both of the other time points ( P = .001 for both). Conclusion: Allograft extrusion did not progress until 1 year after MMAT; however, by midterm follow-up, extrusion had progressed in both the coronal and the sagittal planes. Preoperative axial alignment showed a positive correlation with allograft extrusion in the coronal plane.

Absolute Meniscal Extrusion After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Does Not Progress During Long-term Follow-up: Average of 10.3 Years’ Follow-up Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 326-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Min Lee ◽  
Seong-Il Bin ◽  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Bum-Sik Lee ◽  
Jun-Gu Park
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Meniscal Extrusion ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Width Reduction ◽  
Time Point

Background: Long-term outcomes after lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) are not completely understood. Purpose/Hypothesis: We investigated changes in meniscal extrusion in the coronal and sagittal planes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after lateral MAT through long-term follow-up. We hypothesized that meniscal extrusion would progress during follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients subjected to lateral MAT were followed up by MRI evaluation in both planes at 1, 4 to 6, and >8 years after MAT. Meniscal extrusion and entire meniscal widths in the coronal plane and anterior (ACMD) and posterior (PCMD) cartilage meniscal distances in the sagittal plane were measured, and values were compared at each time point. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm score. Results: A total of 27 lateral MATs were included with a mean MRI follow-up period of 10.3 years (range, 8.1-15.3 years). The mean absolute meniscal extrusion (coronal plane) was not significantly different at each time point. However, the relative value differed (0.27 ± 0.04 at 1 year; 0.33 ± 0.06 at >8 years after MAT) owing to entire meniscal width reduction. There was no difference in the mean absolute value of the ACMD in the sagittal plane. However, relative values differed (0.21 ± 0.01 at 1 year; 0.27 ± 0.06 at >8 years) owing to entire meniscal width reduction. Absolute and relative values of the PCMD remained unaffected at each time point. The Lysholm score increased after surgery but did not differ postoperatively. Conclusion: During the long-term follow-up of extrusion after lateral MAT using MRI, absolute extrusion remained unchanged across all planes. Relative extrusion in the coronal plane and of the ACMD in the sagittal plane significantly increased, with no differences in the PCMD on follow-up. Clinical outcomes after surgery improved compared with those before surgery and were maintained throughout the long-term follow-up period.

Does Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Using the Keyhole Technique Restore the Anatomic Location of the Native Lateral Meniscus?

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1744-1752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam-Ki Kim ◽  
Seong-Il Bin ◽  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Chang-Rack Lee
Keyword(s):  
Relative Position ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Absolute Position ◽  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Absolute

Background: It is important to restore the normal anatomy of the native meniscus in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) for successful surgical results. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomic positions of the anterior horn (AH) and posterior horn (PH) between the preoperative lateral meniscus and postoperative meniscal allograft after lateral MAT using the keyhole technique. We hypothesized that the keyhole technique could restore the preoperative anatomy of the native lateral meniscus. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between December 2012 and December 2014, a total of 70 patients underwent lateral MAT using the keyhole technique. The anatomic positions of both horns of the native lateral meniscus and the meniscal allograft were measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Preoperative MRI was performed 1 day before lateral MAT, while postoperative MRI was performed 2 days after lateral MAT. A percentage reference method was used to measure the location of both horns. Results: For the AH, the mean delta value of the absolute position was 0.7 ± 1.8 mm (95% CI, 0.3-1.1 mm) in the coronal plane and 0.5 ± 1.6 mm (95% CI, 0.2-0.9 mm) in the sagittal plane, and the mean delta value of the relative position was 1.0% ± 2.3% (95% CI, 0.5%-1.6%) in the coronal plane and 1.1% ± 3.3% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.8%) in the sagittal plane. For the PH, the mean delta value of the absolute position was 2.4 ± 2.6 mm (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.1 mm) in the coronal plane and −0.1 ± 2.1 mm (95% CI, −0.6 to 0.4 mm) in the sagittal plane, and the mean delta value of the relative position was 3.3% ± 3.5% (95% CI, 2.5% to 4.2%) in the coronal plane and −0.3% ± 4.4% (95% CI, –1.3% to 0.8%) in the sagittal plane. Therefore, the AH moved by a mean of 0.7 mm laterally and 0.5 mm anteriorly (absolute values) and 1.0% laterally and 1.1% anteriorly (relative values) compared with the preoperative position. The PH moved by a mean of 2.4 mm laterally and 0.1 mm posteriorly (absolute values) and 3.3% laterally and 0.3% posteriorly (relative values) compared with the preoperative position. For the AH, the proportion of patients with an absolute delta value of ≥5 mm was 4.3% in the coronal plane and 2.9% in the sagittal plane. For the PH, the proportion of patients with an absolute delta value of ≥5 mm was 18.6% in the coronal plane and 4.3% in the sagittal plane. Conclusion: When comparing the position of the horns preoperatively and postoperatively, both horns showed mean relative postoperative positional changes of <5% of relative values and <5 mm of absolute values in both the coronal and sagittal planes. The keyhole technique in lateral MAT can reconstruct the lateral meniscus close to its native anatomic position by avoiding displacement of >5 mm in both the coronal and sagittal planes.

DOES NAVIGATION TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 1350007
Author(s):  
P. Motwani ◽  
A. Jariwala ◽  
N. Valentine
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Replacement ◽  
Tibial Component ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Computer Navigation ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Tibial Component Alignment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Background: Computer Navigation in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) has completed more than a decade since its inception. From that time, numerous studies have been done to see its effect on the variables of surgery and its outcome. Some studies have shown that it is definitely beneficial while others have negated its superiority over conventional techniques. This is an early outcome study on the results of navigation TKR in terms of alignment and clinical outcome at three years post-operatively. Methods: In the present study, 128 patients who had undergone navigation TKR (128 TKR) between January 2006 and November 2009 were included. The navigation system used was orthoPilot®. Patients were assessed post-operatively at one and three year using knee society score (KSS) and knee function score (KFS). All patients completed one year follow-up and 55 patients completed three year follow-up. From 128 patients, 40 navigated TKR patients operated between November 2007 and 2009 and were compared with 40 patients operated by conventional TKR operated between July 2007 and December 2008. Results: The mean KSS at 1 year post-operatively was 85.60 and at 3 years was 85.87. The mean KFS at 1 year post-operatively was 69.30 and at 3 years was 68.00. There was no statistically significant difference between navigation TKR and conventional TKR in terms of anatomical femoro-tibial alignment, femoral component alignment in coronal and sagittal plane and tibial component alignment in coronal plane. However, there was statistically significant difference between tibial component alignment in sagittal plane (p = 0.000) between both the groups. Conclusion: Computer navigation TKR affords a possibility to place both the femoral and tibial component very precisely without the risk of any greater axis deviation from ideal value. It helps in reducing the outliers in alignment of the limb and that of component and that improves the overall implant survival for a long time post-operatively.

Safety of trastuzumab in HER2-positive primary breast cancer in Japan: Initial safety report for the large-scale cohort study (JBCRG C-01).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 613-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohito Yamamoto ◽  
Hiroyasu Yamashiro ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Shoichiro Ohtani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

613 Background: The global randomized trials with trastuzumab (H) shows increased cardiotoxicity in patients (pts) with HER2 positive early breast cancer (BC). Safety in Japanese has not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the safety, especially focused on cardiotoxicity, of H adjuvant (adj) therapy in an observational study in Japan (UMIN000002737). Methods: Pts with histopathologically confirmed HER2 positive invasive BC were registered. Women with stage I-IIIC disease who received H as neo-adj and/or adj therapy were eligible. Mean LVEF at 3, 6, 9 and 18 months (M) was evaluated. The time points represent examination on day 60-120, 150-210, 240-330 and 455-635, respectively. Results: A total of 2024 pts were registered from 56 institutes between July 2009 and June 2011. Data of 1875 pts were collected and finalized by September 2012, and 1800 of them were analyzed for safety. The median follow-up was 35 M. The mean age was 54.5 years. Elderly pts ≥60 years were 32.7%. Treatments after surgery were: concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and H in 20.1%, sequential CT and H in 43.5% and H monotherapy in 35.9%. Adverse events (AEs) associated with H were reported in 350 pts (19.4%) and grade (G) 3/4 AEs in 12 pts (0.7%). G 3/4 cardiotoxicity was reported in 7 pts (dysfunction, 4pts; angina, 1 pt; myocardial infarction, 1 pt and heart failure, 1 pt). The mean LVEF at the baseline was 69.4%. Mean LVEF at 3, 6, 9 and 18M were 66.9%, 66.3%, 65.3% and 66.3%, respectively. Compared to the baseline, LVEF decreased with significant difference at all time points (p<0.0001). LVEF decrease ≥10% occurred in 177 pts (during H treatment,130 and after H treatment, 47). Follow-up data were available in 66 pts: 34 pts recovered to the baseline. Mean time to recover was 262 days. The univariate analysis showed using anthracycline (odds ratio 2.312, p=0.003) was the only risk factor for cardiotoxicity. However, elderly, radiation concurrent/sequential treatment with CT and H had no impact. Conclusions: From our study, we found the AE profiles of H were consistent with previously known AEs. We found using anthracycline was the risk factor for cardiotoxicity at the moment. We should carefully follow pts and watch long-term safety. Clinical trial information: 000002737.

scholarly journals Posterior hemivertebra resection and monosegmental fusion in the treatment of congenital scoliosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
X Zhu ◽  
X Wei ◽  
J Chen ◽  
C Li ◽  
M Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Congenital Scoliosis ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Hemivertebra Resection ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Whole Spine

INTRODUCTION Posterior hemivertebra resection combined with multisegmental or bisegmental fusion has been applied successfully for congenital scoliosis. However, there are several immature bones and their growth can be influenced by long segmental fusion in congenital patients. Posterior hemivertebra resection and monosegmental fusion was therefore suggested for treatment of congenital scoliosis caused by hemivertebra. METHODS Between June 2001 and June 2010, 60 congenital scoliosis patients (aged 2–18 years) who underwent posterior hemivertebra resection and monosegmental fusion were enrolled in our study. A standing anteroposterior x-ray of the whole spine was obtained preoperatively, postoperatively and at the last follow-up appointment to analyse the Cobb angle in the coronal and sagittal planes as well as the trunk shift. RESULTS The mean preoperative coronal plane Cobb angle was 41.6°. This was corrected to 5.1° postoperatively and 5.3° at the last follow-up visit (correction 87.3%). The compensatory cranial curve was improved from 18.1° preoperatively to 7.1° postoperatively and 6.5° at the last follow-up visit while the compensatory caudal curve was improved from 21.5° to 6.1° after surgery and 5.6° at the last follow-up visit. The mean sagittal plane Cobb angle was 23.3° before surgery, 7.3° after surgery and 6.8° at the last follow-up visit (correction 70.1%). The trunk shift of 18.5mm was improved to 15.2mm. CONCLUSIONS Posterior hemivertebra resection and monosegmental fusion seems to be an effective approach for treatment of congenital scoliosis caused by hemivertebra, allowing for excellent correction in both the frontal and sagittal planes.

scholarly journals Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: results at 6-year Mean Follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0019
Author(s):  
Matías Costa-Paz ◽  
Carlos Yacuzzi ◽  
Franco Luis De-Cicco ◽  
Juan Ignacio Theaux ◽  
Juan Pablo Zicaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Meniscal Extrusion ◽  
Average Percentage ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and imaging results in a series of patients who underwent a meniscal allograft transplant (MAT). Methods A retrospective study was performed. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and physical examinations were reviewed to measure clinical outcomes after MAT. Osteoarthritic changes were assessed by Plain radiography according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification and meniscal extrusion by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Surgical technique and related procedures were analyzed. Complications were registered. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results Surgeries were performed in 41 patients, 36 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five were male and 11 women. The mean age was 35 years old (SD 8). The mean follow-up was 71 months (range 24 to 184). The mean time between meniscectomy and meniscal transplant was 12.8 years (SD 6,7). Twenty-three were lateral menisci. The following related procedures were performed: Seven ACL reconstructions, 3 ACL revisions, 19 mosaicplasties and 3 osteotomies. The mean preoperative results of IKDC and Lysholm scores were 30.3 (SD 15.5) and 43.8 (SD 16.8) respectively and postoperative results were 78.8 (SD 21.1) and 61.1 (SD 15) respectively. There were no significative radiographic changes at the end of the follow-up. Mean KL preoperative was 2 (IQR 1) and last follow up was 2 (IQR 1) p= 0.053. Preoperative KL grade 1: 33%, grade 2: 50% and grade 3: 17% and last follow up KL grade 1: 22%, grade 2 56% and grade 3 22%. The average percentage of extruded meniscus was 53% in 22 patients evaluated with MR (range 19% to 100%). Five presented arthrofibrosis that required mobilization under anesthesia and partial meniscectomy of the MAT was required in 6 patients. Two transplants failed. Conclusion Although 53% of meniscal extrusion was observed in the MR, we found no correlation with clinical outcomes. MAT achieved good clinical results without osteoarthritic changes after a mean of 6-years follow-up, with 5% of failure. MAT appears to be a safe and effective treatment, which should be considered as a suitable option in the clinical practice.

scholarly journals Evaluation and Experience in the Treatment of Coronal Plane Elbow Fractures via the Anterior Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiyu Jia ◽  
Xiangxiang Li ◽  
Jing Zhan ◽  
Dongsheng Chen ◽  
Kai Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Single Fracture ◽  
Elbow Fracture ◽  
Nerve Paralysis ◽  
Elbow Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The existing approaches to treating elbow fractures include anterior, external, internal, and posterior approaches. Of these, the anterior approach is often not chosen by surgeons to avoid damaging important nerves and blood vessels. In fact, the anterior approach has unique advantages. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes in 38 patients with coronal plane elbow fractures treated through the anterior approach.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 38 cases of coronal plane elbow fractures treated through an anterior approach at our institution between March 2015 and July 2019. The length of the surgical incision, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. The range of flexion, extension, and rotation of the affected elbow and the healthy elbow were collected at follow-up. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Function Score (MEPS).Results: All 38 patients were followed up. At the final follow-up, solid osseous union was confirmed for all coronal plane elbow fractures. The mean elbow flexion arc was 129.26 ± 6.9 degrees, and the extension arc was 8.87 ± 6.13 degrees. The mean pronation arc was 83.45 ± 2.9 degrees, and the supination arc was 80.05 ± 2.92 degrees. The mean MEPS was 90.0±7.53 points, with 18 excellent cases and 20 good cases. There was no significant difference in elbow extension, flexion, and pronation between 31 cases of single fracture and the healthy elbow (P > 0.05); the arc of supination was slightly worse than that of the healthy elbow (P < 0.05). The VAS pain scores of the patients before the operation, three months after the operation, and during follow-up were compared. The pain of the patients was significantly reduced after treatment (P < 0.05). Two patients experienced transient postoperative median nerve paralysis, from which they recovered within three months. One patient had mild heterotopic ossification and was not treated because it did not affect the function of the elbow joint. All patients returned to work and were satisfied with the treatment.Conclusion: The anterior approach has the benefits of simplicity, safety, minimal invasion, excellent exposure, and satisfactory prognosis for coronal plane elbow fracture.

scholarly journals Analysis of the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongqi Zhang ◽  
Guanteng Yang ◽  
Chaofeng Guo ◽  
Jinyang Liu ◽  
minxing tang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Contribution Rate ◽  
Major Curve ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scoliosis Correction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Absolute Contribution

Abstract Introduction: Strong halo-femoral traction has been widely used in the field of severe rigid scoliosis correction. The objective of this study was to analyze the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis and discuss its meaning.Material and methods: A retrospective review was performed for patients with severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis who were treated with halo-femoral traction in our center from December 2008 to December 2015. All cases underwent halo-femoral traction for 2 to 4 weeks before a one-stage posterior operation, and the absolute and relative contribution rates of each orthopedic factor (bending, fulcrum, traction, surgery) were analyzed.Results: A total of 38 patients were included (15 male and 23 female), with a mean age of 16.4± 3.73 years (10-22 years) and follow-up of 55.05 ± 6.63 mos. (range 40-68 mos.). The etiology was congenital in 17 patients, neuromuscular in 14 patients, neurofibromatosis-1 in 3 patients and Marfan syndrome in 2 patients. Congenital high scapular disease with scoliosis was found in 2 patients. The mean coronal Cobb angle of the major curve was 97.99°±11.47° (range 78°–124°), with a mean flexibility of 15.68% ±6.65%. The absolute contribution rate (ACR) of bending was 27.26% ±10.16%, the ACR of the fulcrum was 10.91% ±2.50%, the ACR of traction was 32.32% ±11.41%, and the ACR of surgery was 29.50% ±9.70%. A significant difference in correction was noted between the ACRs of traction and the fulcrum (P < 0.05).Discussion: Strong halo-femoral traction plays a relatively significant role in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis while decreasing the risk of operation, and it is a safe and effective method for the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis.

scholarly journals Analysis of the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongqi Zhang ◽  
Guanteng Yang ◽  
Chaofeng Guo ◽  
Jinyang Liu ◽  
Mingxing Tang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Contribution Rate ◽  
Major Curve ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scoliosis Correction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Absolute Contribution

Abstract Introduction Strong halo-femoral traction has been widely used in the field of severe rigid scoliosis correction. The objective of this study was to analyze the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis and discuss its meaning. Material and methods A retrospective review was performed for patients with severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis who were treated with halo-femoral traction in our center from December 2008 to December 2015. All cases underwent halo-femoral traction for 2 to 4 weeks before a one-stage posterior operation, and the absolute and relative contribution rates of each orthopedic factor (bending, fulcrum, traction, surgery) were analyzed. Results A total of 38 patients were included (15 males and 23 females), with a mean age of 16.4 ± 3.73 years (10–22 years) and follow-up of 55.05 ± 6.63 months (range 40–68 months). The etiology was congenital in 17 patients, neuromuscular in 14 patients, neurofibromatosis-1 in 3 patients, and Marfan syndrome in 2 patients. Congenital high scapular disease with scoliosis was found in 2 patients. The mean coronal Cobb angle of the major curve was 97.99° ± 11.47° (range 78°–124°), with a mean flexibility of 15.68% ± 6.65%. The absolute contribution rate (ACR) of bending was 27.26% ± 10.16%, the ACR of the fulcrum was 10.91% ± 2.50%, the ACR of traction was 32.32% ± 11.41%, and the ACR of surgery was 29.50% ± 9.70%. A significant difference in correction was noted between the ACRs of traction and the fulcrum (P < 0.05). Discussion Strong halo-femoral traction plays a relatively significant role in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis while decreasing the risk of operation, and it is a safe and effective method for the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document