scholarly journals Long-Term Impact of Residual Symptoms in Treatment-Resistant Depression

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 549-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abebaw Fekadu ◽  
Sarah C Wooderson ◽  
Lena J Rane ◽  
Kalypso Markopoulou ◽  
Lucia Poon ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junus M. van der Wal ◽  
Isidoor O. Bergfeld ◽  
Anja Lok ◽  
Mariska Mantione ◽  
Martijn Figee ◽  
...  

ObjectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) reduces depressive symptoms in approximately 40%–60% of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but data on long-term efficacy and safety are scarce. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of DBS targeted at the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) in 25 patients with TRD during a 1-year, open-label, maintenance period, which followed a 1-year optimisation period.MethodsDepression severity was measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and self-reported Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). Primary outcomes were response rate (≥50% HAM-D-17 score reduction) after the maintenance phase, approximately 2 years after DBS surgery, and changes in depression scores and occurrence of adverse events during the maintenance phase.ResultsOf 25 operated patients, 21 entered and 18 completed the maintenance phase. After the maintenance phase, eight patients were classified as responder (observed response rate: 44.4%; intention-to-treat: 32.0%). During the maintenance phase, HAM-D-17 and MADRS scores did not change, but the mean IDS-SR score decreased from 38.8 (95% CI 31.2 to 46.5) to 35.0 (95% CI 26.1 to 43.8) (p=0.008). Non-responders after optimisation did not improve during the maintenance phase. Four non-DBS-related serious adverse events occurred, including one suicide attempt.ConclusionsvALIC DBS for TRD showed continued efficacy 2 years after surgery, with symptoms remaining stable after optimisation as rated by clinicians and with patient ratings improving. This supports DBS as a viable treatment option for patients with TRD.Trial registration numberNTR2118.


Neurocase ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Borckardt ◽  
Berry Anderson ◽  
F. Andrew Kozel ◽  
Ziad Nahas ◽  
A. Richard Smith ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 176 (11) ◽  
pp. 949-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Crowell ◽  
Patricio Riva-Posse ◽  
Paul E. Holtzheimer ◽  
Steven J. Garlow ◽  
Mary E. Kelley ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Martinez ◽  
Holly A. Zboyan

AbstractThis is the first case report of a patient who received long-term (69-month) adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and reached VNS battery end-of-service (EOS).The patient is a 41-year-old female with depression who entered a study of adjunctive VNS therapy for TRD. Her Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores dropped from a mean of 33.5 (pre-implantation baseline period) to 16 at the end of the 12-week acute-phase treatment period, and then fluctuated from <7 (normal range) to scores in the moderately depressed range (∼20) during long-term follow-up. Three and one-half years after VNS implantation, the patient's HAM-D scores began to increase from a score of 18 to a peak score of 27 ∼ 16 months later (5-years post-implantation). The patient subsequently reported that she could no longer feel stimulation from the device and device interrogation 2 weeks later indicated battery EOS. The patient was hospitalized due to worsened depression, the pulse generator was replaced, and medication adjusted. HAM-D scores through the subsequent 9 months of followup returned to a pattern of fluctuations within the range noted during the long-term follow-up period prior to VNS battery EOS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document